public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Modules are missed while compiling the same version of kernel
@ 2005-11-12  3:27 Neo Jia
  2005-11-12  7:09 ` Neo Jia
  2005-11-12 14:34 ` Jesper Juhl
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Neo Jia @ 2005-11-12  3:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel

hi,

Today, I am going to recompile the kernel by adding the support of 
RTLinux. The current kernel version is 2..6.9-1.677smp (my processor is 
P4 with HT)  from Fedora Core 3. The target new kernel is also the 2.6.9 
from www.kernel.org after patching by RTLinux. Everything goes smoothly 
while building the kernel. But when I check the modules generated by 
this build, there are a lot of them missed comparing the number of I 
have from the original Fedora Core 3.

Could you give me any hint about this?

Thanks,
Neo

-- 
I would remember that if researchers were not ambitions
probably today we haven't the technology we are using!


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: Modules are missed while compiling the same version of kernel
  2005-11-12  3:27 Modules are missed while compiling the same version of kernel Neo Jia
@ 2005-11-12  7:09 ` Neo Jia
  2005-11-12 14:34 ` Jesper Juhl
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Neo Jia @ 2005-11-12  7:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel

hi,

I am not sure I describe the problem clearly or I am sending to the 
correct mailing list. But I think this problem might be just a How-to 
level question for your, kernel gurus.

Your help will be appreciated!

Thanks,
Neo

Neo Jia wrote:

> hi,
>
> Today, I am going to recompile the kernel by adding the support of 
> RTLinux. The current kernel version is 2..6.9-1.677smp (my processor 
> is P4 with HT)  from Fedora Core 3. The target new kernel is also the 
> 2.6.9 from www.kernel.org after patching by RTLinux. Everything goes 
> smoothly while building the kernel. But when I check the modules 
> generated by this build, there are a lot of them missed comparing the 
> number of I have from the original Fedora Core 3.
>
> Could you give me any hint about this?
>
> Thanks,
> Neo
>

-- 
I would remember that if researchers were not ambitions
probably today we haven't the technology we are using!


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: Modules are missed while compiling the same version of kernel
  2005-11-12  3:27 Modules are missed while compiling the same version of kernel Neo Jia
  2005-11-12  7:09 ` Neo Jia
@ 2005-11-12 14:34 ` Jesper Juhl
  2005-11-12 19:09   ` Lee Revell
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Jesper Juhl @ 2005-11-12 14:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Neo Jia; +Cc: linux-kernel

On 11/12/05, Neo Jia <cjia@cse.unl.edu> wrote:
> hi,
>
> Today, I am going to recompile the kernel by adding the support of
> RTLinux. The current kernel version is 2..6.9-1.677smp (my processor is
> P4 with HT)  from Fedora Core 3. The target new kernel is also the 2.6.9
> from www.kernel.org after patching by RTLinux.

Fedora adds their own patches to the kernel, so your kernel source
from Fedora Core 3 and the one from kernel.org are not equivalent.


>Everything goes smoothly
> while building the kernel. But when I check the modules generated by
> this build, there are a lot of them missed comparing the number of I
> have from the original Fedora Core 3.
>
Did you copy in your original .config and run "make oldconfig" so the
two kernels are configured as closely as possible?

Have you chompared the .config from the old and new kernel to see if
you have the same amount of modules enabled?

Could it be that the Fedora kernels patches add or remove drivers
compared to what's in mainline (I don't use Fedora so I don't know
exactely what patches they add) ?

You are adding the -rt patchset, the changes in there could also
account for some of the difference although I must admit I don't know
exactely what changes the -rt patchset makes - I've never really
looked at it.


> Could you give me any hint about this?

You are using two different versions of the kernel source and have not
told us if they are even configured identically. Frankly I'd be
surprised if they did not have their differences.


--
Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@gmail.com>
Don't top-post  http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/top-post.html
Plain text mails only, please      http://www.expita.com/nomime.html

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: Modules are missed while compiling the same version of kernel
  2005-11-12 14:34 ` Jesper Juhl
@ 2005-11-12 19:09   ` Lee Revell
  2005-11-14  0:35     ` Jesper Juhl
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Lee Revell @ 2005-11-12 19:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jesper Juhl; +Cc: Neo Jia, linux-kernel

On Sat, 2005-11-12 at 15:34 +0100, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> You are adding the -rt patchset, the changes in there could also
> account for some of the difference although I must admit I don't know
> exactely what changes the -rt patchset makes - I've never really
> looked at it. 

Actually he's talking about RTLinux, which is a commercial product.  He
needs to contact his support rep.  Or depending on the nature of his RT
constraints, consider the -rt kernel.

Lee


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: Modules are missed while compiling the same version of kernel
  2005-11-12 19:09   ` Lee Revell
@ 2005-11-14  0:35     ` Jesper Juhl
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Jesper Juhl @ 2005-11-14  0:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Lee Revell; +Cc: Neo Jia, linux-kernel

On 11/12/05, Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com> wrote:
> On Sat, 2005-11-12 at 15:34 +0100, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> > You are adding the -rt patchset, the changes in there could also
> > account for some of the difference although I must admit I don't know
> > exactely what changes the -rt patchset makes - I've never really
> > looked at it.
>
> Actually he's talking about RTLinux, which is a commercial product.  He
> needs to contact his support rep.  Or depending on the nature of his RT
> constraints, consider the -rt kernel.
>
Ohh, whoopsie, I thought he was talking about Ingo's -rt patches.
Thank you for clearing that up.

--
Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@gmail.com>
Don't top-post  http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/top-post.html
Plain text mails only, please      http://www.expita.com/nomime.html

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2005-11-14  0:35 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-11-12  3:27 Modules are missed while compiling the same version of kernel Neo Jia
2005-11-12  7:09 ` Neo Jia
2005-11-12 14:34 ` Jesper Juhl
2005-11-12 19:09   ` Lee Revell
2005-11-14  0:35     ` Jesper Juhl

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox