public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
To: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, malware-list@lists.printk.net,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk,
	arjan@infradead.org, hch@infradead.org, a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v3 7/8] fsnotify: add in inode fsnotify markings
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 18:43:06 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1227915786.3393.21.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081128054241.GJ28946@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>

On Fri, 2008-11-28 at 05:42 +0000, Al Viro wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 12:21:28PM -0500, Eric Paris wrote:
> 
> > +void fsnotify_mark_get(struct fsnotify_mark_entry *entry)
> > +{
> > +	spin_lock(&entry->lock);
> > +	entry->refcnt++;
> > +	spin_unlock(&entry->lock);
> > +}
> 
> > +void fsnotify_mark_put(struct fsnotify_mark_entry *entry)
> > +{
> > +	spin_lock(&entry->lock);
> > +	entry->refcnt--;
> > +	/* if (!refcnt && killme) we are off both lists and nothing else can find us. */
> > +	if ((!entry->refcnt) && (entry->killme)) {
> > +		spin_unlock(&entry->lock);
> > +		fsnotify_mark_kill(entry);
> > +		return;
> > +	}
> > +	spin_unlock(&entry->lock);
> > +}
> 
> Uh-huh...  And what happens if fsnotify_mark_get() comes in the middle
> of final fsnotify_mark_put()?  You spin on entry->lock, gain it just before
> fsnotify_mark_kill() which proceeds to kfree entry under you just as you
> increment its refcnt...

fsnotify_mark_get() can only find this object through either the
entry->i_list or entry->g_list.  When we drop our ref to 0 and hold the
spinlock we know that no other task would have been able to find us on
those lists (everything that searches the i_list holds the
i_fsnotify_lock and that lock was dropped since we cleared ourselves
from that list and the same is true for the lock on the g_list side)

So if kill_me is set and the refcnt == 0 we are not on either list and
no other task could find this to try to call mark_get().   I'll review
it to make sure, but the design is that we are safe since nothing else
can find us to increment the ref cnt.
> 
> > +void fsnotify_clear_mark_group(struct fsnotify_group *group)
> > +{
> > +	struct fsnotify_mark_entry *entry;
> > +	struct inode *inode;
> > +
> > +	mutex_lock(&group->mark_mutex);
> > +	while (!list_empty(&group->mark_entries)) {
> > +		entry = list_first_entry(&group->mark_entries, struct fsnotify_mark_entry, g_list);
> > +
> > +		/* make sure the entry survives until it is off both lists */
> > +		fsnotify_mark_get(entry);
> > +
> > +		/* remove from g_list */
> > +		list_del_init(&entry->g_list);
> > +		mutex_unlock(&group->mark_mutex);
> > +
> > +		inode = entry->inode;
> > +
> > +		spin_lock(&entry->lock);
> > +		entry->killme = 1;
> > +		spin_unlock(&entry->lock);
> > 
> > +		/* remove from i_list */
> > +		spin_lock(&inode->i_fsnotify_lock);
> 
> ... and just what would keep the inode from being freed under you here?

I'll review.


  reply	other threads:[~2008-11-28 23:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-11-25 17:20 [PATCH -v3 0/8] file notification: fsnotify a unified file notification backend Eric Paris
2008-11-25 17:20 ` [PATCH -v3 1/8] filesystem notification: create fs/notify to contain all fs notification Eric Paris
2008-11-28  5:24   ` Al Viro
2008-11-25 17:21 ` [PATCH -v3 2/8] fsnotify: pass a file instead of an inode to open, read, and write Eric Paris
2008-11-25 17:21 ` [PATCH -v3 3/8] fsnotify: sys_execve and sys_uselib do not call into fsnotify Eric Paris
2008-11-28 10:16   ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-11-25 17:21 ` [PATCH -v3 4/8] fsnotify: use the new open-exec hook for inotify and dnotify Eric Paris
2008-11-25 17:21 ` [PATCH -v3 5/8] fsnotify: unified filesystem notification backend Eric Paris
2008-11-27 16:14   ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-11-27 16:17   ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-11-27 16:20   ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-11-28 23:22     ` Eric Paris
2008-11-28 23:39       ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-11-27 16:21   ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-11-28  4:54   ` Al Viro
2008-11-28 23:32     ` Eric Paris
2008-11-25 17:21 ` [PATCH -v3 6/8] fsnotify: add group priorities Eric Paris
2008-11-27 16:25   ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-12-01 15:20     ` Eric Paris
2008-12-01 15:37       ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-11-25 17:21 ` [PATCH -v3 7/8] fsnotify: add in inode fsnotify markings Eric Paris
2008-11-27 16:29   ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-11-28  5:42   ` Al Viro
2008-11-28 23:43     ` Eric Paris [this message]
2008-11-25 17:21 ` [PATCH -v3 8/8] dnotify: reimplement dnotify using fsnotify Eric Paris
2008-11-28  5:14   ` Al Viro
2008-11-28 23:37     ` Eric Paris
2008-11-28  6:25   ` Al Viro
2008-11-28 23:44     ` Eric Paris
2008-11-26  0:14 ` [PATCH -v3 0/8] file notification: fsnotify a unified file notification backend Andrew Morton
2008-11-26  2:00   ` Eric Paris

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1227915786.3393.21.camel@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=eparis@redhat.com \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=arjan@infradead.org \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=malware-list@lists.printk.net \
    --cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox