From: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
To: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, malware-list@lists.printk.net,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk,
arjan@infradead.org, hch@infradead.org, a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v3 7/8] fsnotify: add in inode fsnotify markings
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 18:43:06 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1227915786.3393.21.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081128054241.GJ28946@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
On Fri, 2008-11-28 at 05:42 +0000, Al Viro wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 12:21:28PM -0500, Eric Paris wrote:
>
> > +void fsnotify_mark_get(struct fsnotify_mark_entry *entry)
> > +{
> > + spin_lock(&entry->lock);
> > + entry->refcnt++;
> > + spin_unlock(&entry->lock);
> > +}
>
> > +void fsnotify_mark_put(struct fsnotify_mark_entry *entry)
> > +{
> > + spin_lock(&entry->lock);
> > + entry->refcnt--;
> > + /* if (!refcnt && killme) we are off both lists and nothing else can find us. */
> > + if ((!entry->refcnt) && (entry->killme)) {
> > + spin_unlock(&entry->lock);
> > + fsnotify_mark_kill(entry);
> > + return;
> > + }
> > + spin_unlock(&entry->lock);
> > +}
>
> Uh-huh... And what happens if fsnotify_mark_get() comes in the middle
> of final fsnotify_mark_put()? You spin on entry->lock, gain it just before
> fsnotify_mark_kill() which proceeds to kfree entry under you just as you
> increment its refcnt...
fsnotify_mark_get() can only find this object through either the
entry->i_list or entry->g_list. When we drop our ref to 0 and hold the
spinlock we know that no other task would have been able to find us on
those lists (everything that searches the i_list holds the
i_fsnotify_lock and that lock was dropped since we cleared ourselves
from that list and the same is true for the lock on the g_list side)
So if kill_me is set and the refcnt == 0 we are not on either list and
no other task could find this to try to call mark_get(). I'll review
it to make sure, but the design is that we are safe since nothing else
can find us to increment the ref cnt.
>
> > +void fsnotify_clear_mark_group(struct fsnotify_group *group)
> > +{
> > + struct fsnotify_mark_entry *entry;
> > + struct inode *inode;
> > +
> > + mutex_lock(&group->mark_mutex);
> > + while (!list_empty(&group->mark_entries)) {
> > + entry = list_first_entry(&group->mark_entries, struct fsnotify_mark_entry, g_list);
> > +
> > + /* make sure the entry survives until it is off both lists */
> > + fsnotify_mark_get(entry);
> > +
> > + /* remove from g_list */
> > + list_del_init(&entry->g_list);
> > + mutex_unlock(&group->mark_mutex);
> > +
> > + inode = entry->inode;
> > +
> > + spin_lock(&entry->lock);
> > + entry->killme = 1;
> > + spin_unlock(&entry->lock);
> >
> > + /* remove from i_list */
> > + spin_lock(&inode->i_fsnotify_lock);
>
> ... and just what would keep the inode from being freed under you here?
I'll review.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-11-28 23:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-11-25 17:20 [PATCH -v3 0/8] file notification: fsnotify a unified file notification backend Eric Paris
2008-11-25 17:20 ` [PATCH -v3 1/8] filesystem notification: create fs/notify to contain all fs notification Eric Paris
2008-11-28 5:24 ` Al Viro
2008-11-25 17:21 ` [PATCH -v3 2/8] fsnotify: pass a file instead of an inode to open, read, and write Eric Paris
2008-11-25 17:21 ` [PATCH -v3 3/8] fsnotify: sys_execve and sys_uselib do not call into fsnotify Eric Paris
2008-11-28 10:16 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-11-25 17:21 ` [PATCH -v3 4/8] fsnotify: use the new open-exec hook for inotify and dnotify Eric Paris
2008-11-25 17:21 ` [PATCH -v3 5/8] fsnotify: unified filesystem notification backend Eric Paris
2008-11-27 16:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-11-27 16:17 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-11-27 16:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-11-28 23:22 ` Eric Paris
2008-11-28 23:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-11-27 16:21 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-11-28 4:54 ` Al Viro
2008-11-28 23:32 ` Eric Paris
2008-11-25 17:21 ` [PATCH -v3 6/8] fsnotify: add group priorities Eric Paris
2008-11-27 16:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-12-01 15:20 ` Eric Paris
2008-12-01 15:37 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-11-25 17:21 ` [PATCH -v3 7/8] fsnotify: add in inode fsnotify markings Eric Paris
2008-11-27 16:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-11-28 5:42 ` Al Viro
2008-11-28 23:43 ` Eric Paris [this message]
2008-11-25 17:21 ` [PATCH -v3 8/8] dnotify: reimplement dnotify using fsnotify Eric Paris
2008-11-28 5:14 ` Al Viro
2008-11-28 23:37 ` Eric Paris
2008-11-28 6:25 ` Al Viro
2008-11-28 23:44 ` Eric Paris
2008-11-26 0:14 ` [PATCH -v3 0/8] file notification: fsnotify a unified file notification backend Andrew Morton
2008-11-26 2:00 ` Eric Paris
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1227915786.3393.21.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=eparis@redhat.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=malware-list@lists.printk.net \
--cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox