public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@kernel.org>
To: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip] perf_counter: Add Generalized Hardware FPU support for AMD
Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2009 18:55:46 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1246454746.3072.10.camel@ht.satnam> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <19019.22396.776453.297335@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com>

On Wed, 2009-07-01 at 22:33 +1000, Paul Mackerras wrote:
> Ingo Molnar writes:
> 
> >         19583739  vec-adds               (   2.01x scaled)
> >         20856051  vec-muls               (   2.01x scaled)
> >         20856051  vec-divs               (   2.01x scaled)
> >      25100224054  vec-idle-cycles        (   1.99x scaled)
> >         12540131  vec-busy-cycles        (   1.99x scaled)
> >         42286702  vec-ops                (   2.01x scaled)
> > 
> > Paulus: would this categorization fit PowerPC too?
> 
> Conceptually that looks nice, but unfortunately we don't have events
> that correspond to that categorization on any PowerPC with vector
> hardware (VMX/Altivec).  POWER6 seems to have the most vector events,
> and they are mostly divided up along the lines of simple / complex /
> permute / load / store operations, and whether they are integer or
> floating-point operations.
> 
> Here are the vector-related events we have on POWER6:
> 
> MRK_VMX0_LD_WRBACK	Marked VMX0 load writeback valid
> MRK_VMX1_LD_WRBACK	Marked VMX1 load writeback valid
> MRK_VMX_COMPLEX_ISSUED	Marked VMX instruction issued to complex
> MRK_VMX_FLOAT_ISSUED	Marked VMX instruction issued to float
> MRK_VMX_PERMUTE_ISSUED	Marked VMX instruction issued to permute
> MRK_VMX_SIMPLE_ISSUED	Marked VMX instruction issued to simple
> MRK_VMX_ST_ISSUED	Marked VMX store issued
> VMX0_INST_ISSUED	VMX0 instruction issued
> VMX0_LD_ISSUED		VMX0 load issued
> VMX0_LD_WRBACK		VMX0 load writeback valid
> VMX0_STALL		VMX0 stall
> VMX1_INST_ISSUED	VMX1 instruction issued
> VMX1_LD_ISSUED		VMX1 load issued
> VMX1_LD_WRBACK		VMX1 load writeback valid
> VMX1_STALL		VMX1 stall
> VMX_COMPLEX_ISSUED	VMX instruction issued to complex
> VMX_FLOAT_ISSUED	VMX instruction issued to float
> VMX_FLOAT_MULTICYCLE	VMX multi-cycle floating point instruction issued
> VMX_PERMUTE_ISSUED	VMX instruction issued to permute
> VMX_RESULT_SAT_0_1	VMX valid result with sat bit is set (0->1)
> VMX_RESULT_SAT_1	VMX valid result with sat=1
> VMX_SIMPLE_ISSUED	VMX instruction issued to simple
> VMX_ST_ISSUED		VMX store issued
> 
> I'm not sure what the exact distinction is between VMX0 and VMX1.
> I'll find out.
> 

I am just guessing for powerpc, normally different units are for
different purpose like some do addition/multiplication and others do
division.

Like in Intel Corei7/Nehalem :

UOPS_EXECUTED.PORT0:     Counts number of Uops executed
                         that were issued on port 0. Port 0
                         handles integer arithmetic, SIMD
                         and FP add Uops.
UOPS_EXECUTED.PORT1:     Counts number of Uops executed
                         that were issued on port 1. Port 1
                         handles integer arithmetic, SIMD,
                         integer shift, FP multiply and FP
                         divide Uops.

Can you provide me the link of the Hardware manual so that I can check
it out.

Thanks,
--
JSR


      parent reply	other threads:[~2009-07-01 13:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-06-29  9:33 [PATCH -tip] perf_counter: Add Generalized Hardware FPU support for AMD Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-06-30 10:11 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-30 13:20   ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-06-30 14:56     ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-06-30 22:42     ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-30 23:14       ` Alan Cox
2009-07-01 12:33       ` Paul Mackerras
2009-07-01 13:12         ` Ingo Molnar
2009-07-01 13:25         ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1246454746.3072.10.camel@ht.satnam \
    --to=jaswinder@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox