From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@kernel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip] perf_counter: Add Generalized Hardware FPU support for AMD
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 12:11:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090630101105.GF6942@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1246267985.3185.3.camel@hpdv5.satnam>
* Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@kernel.org> wrote:
> $./perf stat -e add -e multiply -e fpu-store -e fpu-empty -e fpu-busy -e x87 -e mmx-3dnow -e sse-sse2 -- ls -lR /usr/include/ > /dev/null
>
> Performance counter stats for 'ls -lR /usr/include/':
>
> 7335 add ( 2.00x scaled)
> 8012 multiply ( 1.99x scaled)
> 5229 fpu-store ( 2.00x scaled)
> 793097355 fpu-empty ( 2.00x scaled)
> 182 fpu-busy ( 2.00x scaled)
> 6 x87 ( 2.01x scaled)
> 4 mmx-3dnow ( 2.00x scaled)
> 8933 sse-sse2 ( 2.00x scaled)
>
> 0.393548820 seconds time elapsed
>
> $./perf stat -e add -e multiply -e fpu-store -e fpu-empty -e fpu-busy -e x87 -e mmx-3dnow -e sse-sse2 -- /usr/bin/rhythmbox ~jaswinder/Music/singhiskinng.mp3
>
> Performance counter stats for '/usr/bin/rhythmbox /home/jaswinder/Music/singhiskinng.mp3':
>
> 19583739 add ( 2.01x scaled)
> 20856051 multiply ( 2.01x scaled)
> 18669503 fpu-store ( 2.00x scaled)
> 25100224054 fpu-empty ( 1.99x scaled)
> 12540131 fpu-busy ( 1.99x scaled)
> 207228 x87 ( 1.99x scaled)
> 1768418 mmx-3dnow ( 2.00x scaled)
> 42286702 sse-sse2 ( 2.01x scaled)
>
> 302.698647617 seconds time elapsed
>
> $./perf stat -e add -e multiply -e fpu-store -e fpu-empty -e fpu-busy -e x87 -e mmx-3dnow -e sse-sse2 -- /usr/bin/vlc ~jaswinder/Videos/Linus_Torvalds_interview_with_Charlie_Rose_Part_1.flv
>
> Performance counter stats for '/usr/bin/vlc /home/jaswinder/Videos/Linus_Torvalds_interview_with_Charlie_Rose_Part_1.flv':
>
> 6572682335 add ( 2.00x scaled)
> 11131555181 multiply ( 2.00x scaled)
> 1317520699 fpu-store ( 2.00x scaled)
> 9089415134 fpu-empty ( 1.99x scaled)
> 2902772713 fpu-busy ( 2.00x scaled)
> 26047 x87 ( 2.00x scaled)
> 24850978532 mmx-3dnow ( 2.00x scaled)
> 262276117 sse-sse2 ( 2.01x scaled)
>
> 96.169312358 seconds time elapsed
>
> Signed-off-by: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderrajput@gmail.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_counter.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/linux/perf_counter.h | 17 +++++++++++++++
> kernel/perf_counter.c | 1 +
> tools/perf/util/parse-events.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 4 files changed, 92 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_counter.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_counter.c
> index b83474b..4417edf 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_counter.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_counter.c
> @@ -372,6 +372,12 @@ static const u64 atom_hw_cache_event_ids
> },
> };
>
> +/*
> + * Generalized hw fpu event table
> + */
> +
> +static u64 __read_mostly hw_fpu_event_ids[PERF_COUNT_HW_FPU_MAX];
ok, this looks genuinely useful, but there are some gaps. Where's
the divides? Plus things like mmx-3dnow are AMD specific, sse-sse2
is x86 specific. We definitely want this general table, but the
events should be truly general.
Also, how would this look like on Intel, roughly?
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-30 10:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-29 9:33 [PATCH -tip] perf_counter: Add Generalized Hardware FPU support for AMD Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-06-30 10:11 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2009-06-30 13:20 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-06-30 14:56 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-06-30 22:42 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-30 23:14 ` Alan Cox
2009-07-01 12:33 ` Paul Mackerras
2009-07-01 13:12 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-07-01 13:25 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090630101105.GF6942@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=jaswinder@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox