From: Rajiv Andrade <srajiv@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Andy Isaacson <adi@vmware.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tpmdd-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
adi@hexapodia.org, dds@google.com,
Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Shahbaz Khan <shaz.linux@gmail.com>,
seiji.munetoh@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] tpm_tis: convert from pnp_driver to acpi_driver
Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2009 10:45:19 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1246455920.9140.28.camel@blackbox> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090701110136.576a1d14@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
On Wed, 2009-07-01 at 11:01 +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Jun 2009 18:04:14 -0700
> Andy Isaacson <adi@vmware.com> wrote:
>
> > Not all TIS-compatible TPM chips have a _HID method in their ACPI entry,
> > and the TPM spec says that the _CID method should be used to enumerate
> > the TPM chip.
>
> There are a number of systems with TPMs (older laptops) that don't work
> very well if you enable ACPI.
>
> This is therefore a regression - NAK
>
> Probably the best thing to do is to provide both ACPI and PnP
> registration according to what is configured into the kernel. (And I
> guess spot duplicates although the resource should be busy anyway)
> --
David sent this earlier when I said that PNP didn't work with this chip:
<quote>
The problem here is acpi pnp but the fix is really simple. The current
pnpacpi/core.c routine that looks for isapnp devices enumerated in acpi
enforces that the acpi hid be a valid isapnp id (the formats are
slightly different). But that's broken: it shoudl be enforcing that
either the acpi hid or any acpi cids be valid isapnp ids. It's a
one-line change to do this, see patch 2.
commit 7a553b4e7439ad0733da7da8663d32aa4865aa9e
Author: David Smith <dds@google.com>
Date: Tue Apr 28 18:52:02 2009 +0900
Update ACPI PNP to support devices with EISA PNP CIDs but non-PNP HIDs
Signed-off-by: David Smith <dds@google.com>
diff --git a/drivers/pnp/pnpacpi/core.c b/drivers/pnp/pnpacpi/core.c
index 9496494..8bfddfb 100644
--- a/drivers/pnp/pnpacpi/core.c
+++ b/drivers/pnp/pnpacpi/core.c
@@ -159,8 +159,8 @@ static int __init pnpacpi_add_device(struct acpi_device *device)
* driver should not be loaded.
*/
status = acpi_get_handle(device->handle, "_CRS", &temp);
- if (ACPI_FAILURE(status) || !ispnpidacpi(acpi_device_hid(device)) ||
- is_exclusive_device(device) || (!device->status.present))
+ if (ACPI_FAILURE(status) || is_exclusive_device(device) ||
+ (!device->status.present))
return 0;
dev = pnp_alloc_dev(&pnpacpi_protocol, num, acpi_device_hid(device));
</quote>
If so, we can just base our DATA_EXPECT bypass on the EISA PNP CID:
>From 47516ff6b63b81d1e806148dc5e3052a001e45d0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Rajiv Andrade <srajiv@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 09:59:55 -0300
Subject: [PATCH] TPM: DATA_EXPECT bit check bypass
Since the iTPM doesn't set the DATA_EXPECT bit when it should, we bypass
this bit check in case we're running the code over this specific TPM.
Signed-off-by: Rajiv Andrade <srajiv@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
drivers/char/tpm/tpm.h | 1 +
drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis.c | 11 ++++++++++-
2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.h b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.h
index 8e00b4d..ed4ecf0 100644
--- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.h
+++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.h
@@ -109,6 +109,7 @@ struct tpm_chip {
struct list_head list;
void (*release) (struct device *);
+ bool is_itpm;
};
#define to_tpm_chip(n) container_of(n, struct tpm_chip, vendor)
diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis.c
index aec1931..74a60d7 100644
--- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis.c
+++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis.c
@@ -27,6 +27,7 @@
#include "tpm.h"
#define TPM_HEADER_SIZE 10
+#define ITPM_ID "INTC0102"
enum tis_access {
TPM_ACCESS_VALID = 0x80,
@@ -293,7 +294,9 @@ static int tpm_tis_send(struct tpm_chip *chip, u8 *buf, size_t len)
wait_for_stat(chip, TPM_STS_VALID, chip->vendor.timeout_c,
&chip->vendor.int_queue);
status = tpm_tis_status(chip);
- if ((status & TPM_STS_DATA_EXPECT) == 0) {
+ /* iTPM never sets the DATA_EXPECT bit */
+ if (((status & TPM_STS_DATA_EXPECT) == 0) &&
+ (!chip->is_itpm)) {
rc = -EIO;
goto out_err;
}
@@ -582,6 +585,12 @@ static int tpm_tis_init(struct device *dev, resource_size_t start,
tpm_get_timeouts(chip);
tpm_continue_selftest(chip);
+ for (i=0; i < 8; i++)
+ if (ITPM_ID[i] != to_pnp_dev(dev)->id->id[i])
+ break;
+ if (i == 8)
+ chip->is_itpm = 1;
+
return 0;
out_err:
if (chip->vendor.iobase)
--
1.6.3.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-07-01 13:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-07-01 1:04 [PATCH 0/6] tpm_tis: various cleanups, and support for Intel iTPM Andy Isaacson
2009-07-01 1:04 ` [PATCH 1/6] tpm_tis: various cleanups Andy Isaacson
2009-09-10 19:56 ` Rajiv Andrade
2009-07-01 1:04 ` [PATCH 2/6] tpm_tis: add MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE to enable autoload Andy Isaacson
2009-09-10 19:56 ` Rajiv Andrade
2009-07-01 1:04 ` [PATCH 3/6] tpm_tis: set timeouts before calling request_locality Andy Isaacson
2009-07-01 1:04 ` [PATCH 4/6] tpm_tis: print complete vendor information Andy Isaacson
2009-09-10 19:57 ` Rajiv Andrade
2009-07-01 1:04 ` [PATCH 5/6] tpm_tis: convert from pnp_driver to acpi_driver Andy Isaacson
2009-07-01 10:01 ` Alan Cox
2009-07-01 13:45 ` Rajiv Andrade [this message]
2009-07-16 17:26 ` Rajiv Andrade
2009-07-16 17:43 ` [PATCH] TPM: DATA_EXPECT bit check bypass Rajiv Andrade
2009-07-16 20:08 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2009-07-16 20:50 ` Rajiv Andrade
2009-07-16 21:20 ` Rajiv Andrade
2009-07-20 23:28 ` Andy Isaacson
2009-07-24 17:12 ` Rajiv Andrade
2009-07-20 18:27 ` [PATCH 5/6] tpm_tis: convert from pnp_driver to acpi_driver Andy Isaacson
2009-09-10 19:08 ` Rajiv Andrade
2009-09-10 19:54 ` [PATCH] tpm_tis: TPM_STS_DATA_EXPECT workaround Rajiv Andrade
2009-09-10 19:58 ` Daniel Walker
2009-09-10 20:06 ` Rajiv Andrade
2009-09-10 20:09 ` Rajiv Andrade
2009-09-11 23:34 ` Seiji Munetoh
2009-09-24 18:43 ` Rajiv Andrade
2009-10-28 2:45 ` David Smith
2009-10-31 14:24 ` Eric Paris
2009-11-01 22:09 ` James Morris
2009-09-10 20:27 ` Andy Isaacson
2009-07-01 1:04 ` [PATCH 6/6] tpm_tis: add workarounds for iTPM Andy Isaacson
2009-07-03 18:18 ` [tpmdd-devel] " Marcin Obara
2009-07-03 19:33 ` Andy Isaacson
2009-07-03 20:10 ` Marcin Obara
2009-07-03 20:20 ` Andy Isaacson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1246455920.9140.28.camel@blackbox \
--to=srajiv@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=adi@hexapodia.org \
--cc=adi@vmware.com \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=dds@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=seiji.munetoh@gmail.com \
--cc=shaz.linux@gmail.com \
--cc=tpmdd-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox