* [PATCH] sched: remove noop in next_prio()
@ 2011-05-21 14:19 Hillf Danton
2011-05-24 8:17 ` Yong Zhang
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Hillf Danton @ 2011-05-21 14:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: LKML
Cc: Ingo Molnar, Peter Zijlstra, Steven Rostedt, Mike Galbraith,
Yong Zhang
When computing the next priority for a given run-queue, the check for
RT priority of the task determined by the pick_next_highest_task_rt()
function could be removed, since only RT task is returned by the
function.
Signed-off-by: Hillf Danton <dhillf@gmail.com>
---
--- a/kernel/sched_rt.c 2011-04-27 11:48:50.000000000 +0800
+++ b/kernel/sched_rt.c 2011-05-21 22:10:34.000000000 +0800
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ static inline int next_prio(struct rq *r
{
struct task_struct *next = pick_next_highest_task_rt(rq, rq->cpu);
- if (next && rt_prio(next->prio))
+ if (next)
return next->prio;
else
return MAX_RT_PRIO;
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] sched: remove noop in next_prio()
2011-05-21 14:19 [PATCH] sched: remove noop in next_prio() Hillf Danton
@ 2011-05-24 8:17 ` Yong Zhang
2011-05-24 11:53 ` Mike Galbraith
2011-05-24 13:09 ` Steven Rostedt
2011-08-14 15:59 ` [tip:sched/core] sched: Remove " tip-bot for Hillf Danton
2 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Yong Zhang @ 2011-05-24 8:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Hillf Danton
Cc: LKML, Ingo Molnar, Peter Zijlstra, Steven Rostedt, Mike Galbraith
On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 10:19 PM, Hillf Danton <dhillf@gmail.com> wrote:
> When computing the next priority for a given run-queue, the check for
> RT priority of the task determined by the pick_next_highest_task_rt()
> function could be removed, since only RT task is returned by the
> function.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hillf Danton <dhillf@gmail.com>
Yup, it's true.
Reviewed-by: Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@gmail.com>
> ---
>
> --- a/kernel/sched_rt.c 2011-04-27 11:48:50.000000000 +0800
> +++ b/kernel/sched_rt.c 2011-05-21 22:10:34.000000000 +0800
> @@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ static inline int next_prio(struct rq *r
> {
> struct task_struct *next = pick_next_highest_task_rt(rq, rq->cpu);
>
> - if (next && rt_prio(next->prio))
> + if (next)
> return next->prio;
> else
> return MAX_RT_PRIO;
>
--
Only stand for myself
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] sched: remove noop in next_prio()
2011-05-24 8:17 ` Yong Zhang
@ 2011-05-24 11:53 ` Mike Galbraith
2011-05-24 14:20 ` Hillf Danton
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Mike Galbraith @ 2011-05-24 11:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Yong Zhang
Cc: Hillf Danton, LKML, Ingo Molnar, Peter Zijlstra, Steven Rostedt
On Tue, 2011-05-24 at 16:17 +0800, Yong Zhang wrote:
> On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 10:19 PM, Hillf Danton <dhillf@gmail.com> wrote:
> > When computing the next priority for a given run-queue, the check for
> > RT priority of the task determined by the pick_next_highest_task_rt()
> > function could be removed, since only RT task is returned by the
> > function.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Hillf Danton <dhillf@gmail.com>
>
> Yup, it's true.
(could whack the else while there)
> Reviewed-by: Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@gmail.com>
>
> > ---
> >
> > --- a/kernel/sched_rt.c 2011-04-27 11:48:50.000000000 +0800
> > +++ b/kernel/sched_rt.c 2011-05-21 22:10:34.000000000 +0800
> > @@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ static inline int next_prio(struct rq *r
> > {
> > struct task_struct *next = pick_next_highest_task_rt(rq, rq->cpu);
> >
> > - if (next && rt_prio(next->prio))
> > + if (next)
> > return next->prio;
> > else
> > return MAX_RT_PRIO;
> >
>
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] sched: remove noop in next_prio()
2011-05-21 14:19 [PATCH] sched: remove noop in next_prio() Hillf Danton
2011-05-24 8:17 ` Yong Zhang
@ 2011-05-24 13:09 ` Steven Rostedt
2011-08-14 15:59 ` [tip:sched/core] sched: Remove " tip-bot for Hillf Danton
2 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Steven Rostedt @ 2011-05-24 13:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Hillf Danton
Cc: LKML, Ingo Molnar, Peter Zijlstra, Mike Galbraith, Yong Zhang
On Sat, 2011-05-21 at 22:19 +0800, Hillf Danton wrote:
> When computing the next priority for a given run-queue, the check for
> RT priority of the task determined by the pick_next_highest_task_rt()
> function could be removed, since only RT task is returned by the
> function.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hillf Danton <dhillf@gmail.com>
> ---
Acked-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
-- Steve
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] sched: remove noop in next_prio()
2011-05-24 14:20 ` Hillf Danton
@ 2011-05-24 14:16 ` Jesper Juhl
2011-05-24 14:26 ` Hillf Danton
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Jesper Juhl @ 2011-05-24 14:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Hillf Danton
Cc: Mike Galbraith, Yong Zhang, LKML, Ingo Molnar, Peter Zijlstra,
Steven Rostedt
On Tue, 24 May 2011, Hillf Danton wrote:
> On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 7:53 PM, Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2011-05-24 at 16:17 +0800, Yong Zhang wrote:
> >> On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 10:19 PM, Hillf Danton <dhillf@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > When computing the next priority for a given run-queue, the check for
> >> > RT priority of the task determined by the pick_next_highest_task_rt()
> >> > function could be removed, since only RT task is returned by the
> >> > function.
> >> >
> >> > Signed-off-by: Hillf Danton <dhillf@gmail.com>
> >>
> >> Yup, it's true.
> >
> > (could whack the else while there)
> >
>
> Where is it, Mike?
>
- if (next && rt_prio(next->prio))
+ if (next)
return next->prio;
- else
- return MAX_RT_PRIO;
+ return MAX_RT_PRIO;
--
Jesper Juhl <jj@chaosbits.net> http://www.chaosbits.net/
Don't top-post http://www.catb.org/jargon/html/T/top-post.html
Plain text mails only, please.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] sched: remove noop in next_prio()
2011-05-24 11:53 ` Mike Galbraith
@ 2011-05-24 14:20 ` Hillf Danton
2011-05-24 14:16 ` Jesper Juhl
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Hillf Danton @ 2011-05-24 14:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mike Galbraith
Cc: Yong Zhang, LKML, Ingo Molnar, Peter Zijlstra, Steven Rostedt
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 7:53 PM, Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-05-24 at 16:17 +0800, Yong Zhang wrote:
>> On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 10:19 PM, Hillf Danton <dhillf@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > When computing the next priority for a given run-queue, the check for
>> > RT priority of the task determined by the pick_next_highest_task_rt()
>> > function could be removed, since only RT task is returned by the
>> > function.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Hillf Danton <dhillf@gmail.com>
>>
>> Yup, it's true.
>
> (could whack the else while there)
>
Where is it, Mike?
thanks
Hillf
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] sched: remove noop in next_prio()
2011-05-24 14:16 ` Jesper Juhl
@ 2011-05-24 14:26 ` Hillf Danton
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Hillf Danton @ 2011-05-24 14:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jesper Juhl
Cc: Mike Galbraith, Yong Zhang, LKML, Ingo Molnar, Peter Zijlstra,
Steven Rostedt
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 10:16 PM, Jesper Juhl <jj@chaosbits.net> wrote:
> On Tue, 24 May 2011, Hillf Danton wrote:
>
>> On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 7:53 PM, Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> wrote:
>> > On Tue, 2011-05-24 at 16:17 +0800, Yong Zhang wrote:
>> >> On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 10:19 PM, Hillf Danton <dhillf@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> > When computing the next priority for a given run-queue, the check for
>> >> > RT priority of the task determined by the pick_next_highest_task_rt()
>> >> > function could be removed, since only RT task is returned by the
>> >> > function.
>> >> >
>> >> > Signed-off-by: Hillf Danton <dhillf@gmail.com>
>> >>
>> >> Yup, it's true.
>> >
>> > (could whack the else while there)
>> >
>>
>> Where is it, Mike?
>>
>
>
> - if (next && rt_prio(next->prio))
> + if (next)
> return next->prio;
> - else
> - return MAX_RT_PRIO;
> + return MAX_RT_PRIO;
>
>
>
> --
> Jesper Juhl <jj@chaosbits.net> http://www.chaosbits.net/
> Don't top-post http://www.catb.org/jargon/html/T/top-post.html
> Plain text mails only, please.
>
>
Very cool, thank you:)
Hillf
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [tip:sched/core] sched: Remove noop in next_prio()
2011-05-21 14:19 [PATCH] sched: remove noop in next_prio() Hillf Danton
2011-05-24 8:17 ` Yong Zhang
2011-05-24 13:09 ` Steven Rostedt
@ 2011-08-14 15:59 ` tip-bot for Hillf Danton
2 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: tip-bot for Hillf Danton @ 2011-08-14 15:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-tip-commits
Cc: linux-kernel, hpa, mingo, a.p.zijlstra, dhillf, rostedt, tglx,
yong.zhang0, mingo
Commit-ID: 67d955383ab2ef8866c494c14156a4f3d29e441c
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/67d955383ab2ef8866c494c14156a4f3d29e441c
Author: Hillf Danton <dhillf@gmail.com>
AuthorDate: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 21:55:18 -0400
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
CommitDate: Sun, 14 Aug 2011 12:00:45 +0200
sched: Remove noop in next_prio()
When computing the next priority for a given run-queue, the check for
RT priority of the task determined by the pick_next_highest_task_rt()
function could be removed, since only RT tasks are returned by the
function.
Reviewed-by: Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Hillf Danton <dhillf@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/BANLkTimxmWiof9s5AvS3v_0X+sMiE=0x5g@mail.gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
---
kernel/sched_rt.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched_rt.c b/kernel/sched_rt.c
index 97540f0..e2698c0 100644
--- a/kernel/sched_rt.c
+++ b/kernel/sched_rt.c
@@ -704,7 +704,7 @@ static inline int next_prio(struct rq *rq)
{
struct task_struct *next = pick_next_highest_task_rt(rq, rq->cpu);
- if (next && rt_prio(next->prio))
+ if (next)
return next->prio;
else
return MAX_RT_PRIO;
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-08-14 15:59 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-05-21 14:19 [PATCH] sched: remove noop in next_prio() Hillf Danton
2011-05-24 8:17 ` Yong Zhang
2011-05-24 11:53 ` Mike Galbraith
2011-05-24 14:20 ` Hillf Danton
2011-05-24 14:16 ` Jesper Juhl
2011-05-24 14:26 ` Hillf Danton
2011-05-24 13:09 ` Steven Rostedt
2011-08-14 15:59 ` [tip:sched/core] sched: Remove " tip-bot for Hillf Danton
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox