public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] sched: remove noop in next_prio()
@ 2011-05-21 14:19 Hillf Danton
  2011-05-24  8:17 ` Yong Zhang
                   ` (2 more replies)
  0 siblings, 3 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Hillf Danton @ 2011-05-21 14:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: LKML
  Cc: Ingo Molnar, Peter Zijlstra, Steven Rostedt, Mike Galbraith,
	Yong Zhang

When computing the next priority for a given run-queue, the check for
RT priority of the task determined by the pick_next_highest_task_rt()
function could be removed, since only RT task is returned by the
function.

Signed-off-by: Hillf Danton <dhillf@gmail.com>
---

--- a/kernel/sched_rt.c	2011-04-27 11:48:50.000000000 +0800
+++ b/kernel/sched_rt.c	2011-05-21 22:10:34.000000000 +0800
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ static inline int next_prio(struct rq *r
 {
 	struct task_struct *next = pick_next_highest_task_rt(rq, rq->cpu);

-	if (next && rt_prio(next->prio))
+	if (next)
 		return next->prio;
 	else
 		return MAX_RT_PRIO;

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] sched: remove noop in next_prio()
  2011-05-21 14:19 [PATCH] sched: remove noop in next_prio() Hillf Danton
@ 2011-05-24  8:17 ` Yong Zhang
  2011-05-24 11:53   ` Mike Galbraith
  2011-05-24 13:09 ` Steven Rostedt
  2011-08-14 15:59 ` [tip:sched/core] sched: Remove " tip-bot for Hillf Danton
  2 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Yong Zhang @ 2011-05-24  8:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Hillf Danton
  Cc: LKML, Ingo Molnar, Peter Zijlstra, Steven Rostedt, Mike Galbraith

On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 10:19 PM, Hillf Danton <dhillf@gmail.com> wrote:
> When computing the next priority for a given run-queue, the check for
> RT priority of the task determined by the pick_next_highest_task_rt()
> function could be removed, since only RT task is returned by the
> function.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hillf Danton <dhillf@gmail.com>

Yup, it's true.

Reviewed-by: Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@gmail.com>

> ---
>
> --- a/kernel/sched_rt.c 2011-04-27 11:48:50.000000000 +0800
> +++ b/kernel/sched_rt.c 2011-05-21 22:10:34.000000000 +0800
> @@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ static inline int next_prio(struct rq *r
>  {
>        struct task_struct *next = pick_next_highest_task_rt(rq, rq->cpu);
>
> -       if (next && rt_prio(next->prio))
> +       if (next)
>                return next->prio;
>        else
>                return MAX_RT_PRIO;
>



-- 
Only stand for myself

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] sched: remove noop in next_prio()
  2011-05-24  8:17 ` Yong Zhang
@ 2011-05-24 11:53   ` Mike Galbraith
  2011-05-24 14:20     ` Hillf Danton
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Mike Galbraith @ 2011-05-24 11:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Yong Zhang
  Cc: Hillf Danton, LKML, Ingo Molnar, Peter Zijlstra, Steven Rostedt

On Tue, 2011-05-24 at 16:17 +0800, Yong Zhang wrote:
> On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 10:19 PM, Hillf Danton <dhillf@gmail.com> wrote:
> > When computing the next priority for a given run-queue, the check for
> > RT priority of the task determined by the pick_next_highest_task_rt()
> > function could be removed, since only RT task is returned by the
> > function.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Hillf Danton <dhillf@gmail.com>
> 
> Yup, it's true.

(could whack the else while there)

> Reviewed-by: Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@gmail.com>
> 
> > ---
> >
> > --- a/kernel/sched_rt.c 2011-04-27 11:48:50.000000000 +0800
> > +++ b/kernel/sched_rt.c 2011-05-21 22:10:34.000000000 +0800
> > @@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ static inline int next_prio(struct rq *r
> >  {
> >        struct task_struct *next = pick_next_highest_task_rt(rq, rq->cpu);
> >
> > -       if (next && rt_prio(next->prio))
> > +       if (next)
> >                return next->prio;
> >        else
> >                return MAX_RT_PRIO;
> >
> 
> 
> 



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] sched: remove noop in next_prio()
  2011-05-21 14:19 [PATCH] sched: remove noop in next_prio() Hillf Danton
  2011-05-24  8:17 ` Yong Zhang
@ 2011-05-24 13:09 ` Steven Rostedt
  2011-08-14 15:59 ` [tip:sched/core] sched: Remove " tip-bot for Hillf Danton
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Steven Rostedt @ 2011-05-24 13:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Hillf Danton
  Cc: LKML, Ingo Molnar, Peter Zijlstra, Mike Galbraith, Yong Zhang

On Sat, 2011-05-21 at 22:19 +0800, Hillf Danton wrote:
> When computing the next priority for a given run-queue, the check for
> RT priority of the task determined by the pick_next_highest_task_rt()
> function could be removed, since only RT task is returned by the
> function.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Hillf Danton <dhillf@gmail.com>
> ---

Acked-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>

-- Steve



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] sched: remove noop in next_prio()
  2011-05-24 14:20     ` Hillf Danton
@ 2011-05-24 14:16       ` Jesper Juhl
  2011-05-24 14:26         ` Hillf Danton
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Jesper Juhl @ 2011-05-24 14:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Hillf Danton
  Cc: Mike Galbraith, Yong Zhang, LKML, Ingo Molnar, Peter Zijlstra,
	Steven Rostedt

On Tue, 24 May 2011, Hillf Danton wrote:

> On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 7:53 PM, Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2011-05-24 at 16:17 +0800, Yong Zhang wrote:
> >> On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 10:19 PM, Hillf Danton <dhillf@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > When computing the next priority for a given run-queue, the check for
> >> > RT priority of the task determined by the pick_next_highest_task_rt()
> >> > function could be removed, since only RT task is returned by the
> >> > function.
> >> >
> >> > Signed-off-by: Hillf Danton <dhillf@gmail.com>
> >>
> >> Yup, it's true.
> >
> > (could whack the else while there)
> >
> 
> Where is it, Mike?
> 


-       if (next && rt_prio(next->prio))
+       if (next)
               return next->prio;
-       else
-              return MAX_RT_PRIO;
+       return MAX_RT_PRIO;



-- 
Jesper Juhl <jj@chaosbits.net>       http://www.chaosbits.net/
Don't top-post http://www.catb.org/jargon/html/T/top-post.html
Plain text mails only, please.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] sched: remove noop in next_prio()
  2011-05-24 11:53   ` Mike Galbraith
@ 2011-05-24 14:20     ` Hillf Danton
  2011-05-24 14:16       ` Jesper Juhl
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Hillf Danton @ 2011-05-24 14:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Mike Galbraith
  Cc: Yong Zhang, LKML, Ingo Molnar, Peter Zijlstra, Steven Rostedt

On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 7:53 PM, Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-05-24 at 16:17 +0800, Yong Zhang wrote:
>> On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 10:19 PM, Hillf Danton <dhillf@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > When computing the next priority for a given run-queue, the check for
>> > RT priority of the task determined by the pick_next_highest_task_rt()
>> > function could be removed, since only RT task is returned by the
>> > function.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Hillf Danton <dhillf@gmail.com>
>>
>> Yup, it's true.
>
> (could whack the else while there)
>

Where is it, Mike?

thanks
           Hillf

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] sched: remove noop in next_prio()
  2011-05-24 14:16       ` Jesper Juhl
@ 2011-05-24 14:26         ` Hillf Danton
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Hillf Danton @ 2011-05-24 14:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jesper Juhl
  Cc: Mike Galbraith, Yong Zhang, LKML, Ingo Molnar, Peter Zijlstra,
	Steven Rostedt

On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 10:16 PM, Jesper Juhl <jj@chaosbits.net> wrote:
> On Tue, 24 May 2011, Hillf Danton wrote:
>
>> On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 7:53 PM, Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> wrote:
>> > On Tue, 2011-05-24 at 16:17 +0800, Yong Zhang wrote:
>> >> On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 10:19 PM, Hillf Danton <dhillf@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> > When computing the next priority for a given run-queue, the check for
>> >> > RT priority of the task determined by the pick_next_highest_task_rt()
>> >> > function could be removed, since only RT task is returned by the
>> >> > function.
>> >> >
>> >> > Signed-off-by: Hillf Danton <dhillf@gmail.com>
>> >>
>> >> Yup, it's true.
>> >
>> > (could whack the else while there)
>> >
>>
>> Where is it, Mike?
>>
>
>
> -       if (next && rt_prio(next->prio))
> +       if (next)
>               return next->prio;
> -       else
> -              return MAX_RT_PRIO;
> +       return MAX_RT_PRIO;
>
>
>
> --
> Jesper Juhl <jj@chaosbits.net>       http://www.chaosbits.net/
> Don't top-post http://www.catb.org/jargon/html/T/top-post.html
> Plain text mails only, please.
>
>

Very cool, thank you:)

Hillf

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [tip:sched/core] sched: Remove noop in next_prio()
  2011-05-21 14:19 [PATCH] sched: remove noop in next_prio() Hillf Danton
  2011-05-24  8:17 ` Yong Zhang
  2011-05-24 13:09 ` Steven Rostedt
@ 2011-08-14 15:59 ` tip-bot for Hillf Danton
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: tip-bot for Hillf Danton @ 2011-08-14 15:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-tip-commits
  Cc: linux-kernel, hpa, mingo, a.p.zijlstra, dhillf, rostedt, tglx,
	yong.zhang0, mingo

Commit-ID:  67d955383ab2ef8866c494c14156a4f3d29e441c
Gitweb:     http://git.kernel.org/tip/67d955383ab2ef8866c494c14156a4f3d29e441c
Author:     Hillf Danton <dhillf@gmail.com>
AuthorDate: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 21:55:18 -0400
Committer:  Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
CommitDate: Sun, 14 Aug 2011 12:00:45 +0200

sched: Remove noop in next_prio()

When computing the next priority for a given run-queue, the check for
RT priority of the task determined by the pick_next_highest_task_rt()
function could be removed, since only RT tasks are returned by the
function.

Reviewed-by: Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Hillf Danton <dhillf@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/BANLkTimxmWiof9s5AvS3v_0X+sMiE=0x5g@mail.gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
---
 kernel/sched_rt.c |    2 +-
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched_rt.c b/kernel/sched_rt.c
index 97540f0..e2698c0 100644
--- a/kernel/sched_rt.c
+++ b/kernel/sched_rt.c
@@ -704,7 +704,7 @@ static inline int next_prio(struct rq *rq)
 {
 	struct task_struct *next = pick_next_highest_task_rt(rq, rq->cpu);
 
-	if (next && rt_prio(next->prio))
+	if (next)
 		return next->prio;
 	else
 		return MAX_RT_PRIO;

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2011-08-14 15:59 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-05-21 14:19 [PATCH] sched: remove noop in next_prio() Hillf Danton
2011-05-24  8:17 ` Yong Zhang
2011-05-24 11:53   ` Mike Galbraith
2011-05-24 14:20     ` Hillf Danton
2011-05-24 14:16       ` Jesper Juhl
2011-05-24 14:26         ` Hillf Danton
2011-05-24 13:09 ` Steven Rostedt
2011-08-14 15:59 ` [tip:sched/core] sched: Remove " tip-bot for Hillf Danton

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox