From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
To: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] firmware/dmi_scan: Fix most checkpatch errors and warnings
Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2013 09:19:54 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1373386794.14604.14.camel@joe-AO722> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1373384574.4391.9.camel@chaos.site>
On Tue, 2013-07-09 at 17:42 +0200, Jean Delvare wrote:
> Fix all errors and trivial warnings reported by checkpatch for file
> drivers/firmware/dmi_scan.c.
trivia:
> +++ linux-3.11-rc0/drivers/firmware/dmi_scan.c 2013-07-09 16:08:13.979592957 +0200
> @@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ static char * __init dmi_string(const st
> if (str != NULL)
> strcpy(str, bp);
> else
> - printk(KERN_ERR "dmi_string: cannot allocate %Zu bytes.\n", len);
> + pr_err("dmi_string: cannot allocate %Zu bytes.\n", len);
If the function name is used in every printk, it might
be better to add
#define pr_fmt(fmt) "%s: " fmt, __func__
before any #include
If not, then I suggest removing the embedded function names
and writing these as
pr_err("%s: etc...", __func__, etc...);
This eliminates any possible function name mismatch.
> @@ -217,7 +220,7 @@ static void __init dmi_save_one_device(i
>
> dev = dmi_alloc(sizeof(*dev) + strlen(name) + 1);
> if (!dev) {
> - printk(KERN_ERR "dmi_save_one_device: out of memory.\n");
> + pr_err("dmi_save_one_device: out of memory.\n");
OOM messages generally aren't useful.
dmi_alloc is either a trivial front-end to kmalloc,
and kmalloc already does a dump_stack() when OOM, or
for x86, dmi_alloc uses extend_brk which BUGs when
unsuccessful.
x86/ia64 do have a slight mismatch in dmi_alloc as
x86 does a memset(0), and ia64 just does kmalloc.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-09 16:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-09 15:40 [PATCH 0/3] firmware/dmi_scan: Cleanups Jean Delvare
2013-07-09 15:41 ` [PATCH 1/3] firmware/dmi_scan: Drop obsolete comment Jean Delvare
2013-07-09 15:42 ` [PATCH 2/3] firmware/dmi_scan: Fix most checkpatch errors and warnings Jean Delvare
2013-07-09 16:19 ` Joe Perches [this message]
2013-07-09 17:13 ` ia64: dmi.h: Make dmi_alloc use kzalloc Joe Perches
2013-07-09 20:43 ` Tony Luck
2013-07-10 12:28 ` [PATCH 2/3] firmware/dmi_scan: Fix most checkpatch errors and warnings Jean Delvare
2013-07-10 14:59 ` Joe Perches
2013-07-09 15:43 ` [PATCH 3/3] firmware/dmi_scan: Constify strings Jean Delvare
2013-07-09 15:58 ` Joe Perches
2013-07-09 16:23 ` Jean Delvare
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1373386794.14604.14.camel@joe-AO722 \
--to=joe@perches.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ben@decadent.org.uk \
--cc=jdelvare@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox