From: Swee Hua Law <sweehua81@gmail.com>
To: oleg.drokin@intel.com, andreas.dilger@intel.com,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Cc: elfring@users.sourceforge.net, linux.kernel@junien.fridrick.net,
Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr, sweehua81@gmail.com,
HPDD-discuss@ml01.01.org, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH V2 4/4] staging: lustre: checkpatch: argument alignment for readability
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2015 21:54:18 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1439214858-2994-5-git-send-email-sweehua81@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1439214858-2994-1-git-send-email-sweehua81@gmail.com>
Fix checkpatch problem: move last argument of the hlist..() back to same line
Signed-off-by: Swee Hua Law <sweehua81@gmail.com>
---
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/remote_perm.c | 6 ++----
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/remote_perm.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/remote_perm.c
index 49d78a3..39022ea 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/remote_perm.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/remote_perm.c
@@ -104,8 +104,7 @@ void free_rmtperm_hash(struct hlist_head *hash)
return;
for (i = 0; i < REMOTE_PERM_HASHSIZE; i++)
- hlist_for_each_entry_safe(lrp, next, hash + i,
- lrp_list)
+ hlist_for_each_entry_safe(lrp, next, hash + i, lrp_list)
free_ll_remote_perm(lrp);
OBD_SLAB_FREE(hash, ll_rmtperm_hash_cachep,
REMOTE_PERM_HASHSIZE * sizeof(*hash));
@@ -322,8 +321,7 @@ void ll_free_remote_perms(struct inode *inode)
spin_lock(&lli->lli_lock);
for (i = 0; i < REMOTE_PERM_HASHSIZE; i++) {
- hlist_for_each_entry_safe(lrp, node, next, hash + i,
- lrp_list)
+ hlist_for_each_entry_safe(lrp, node, next, hash + i, lrp_list)
free_ll_remote_perm(lrp);
}
--
2.1.4
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-10 13:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-09 15:48 [PATCH] Fix various coding style problem Swee Hua Law
2015-08-10 4:44 ` Sudip Mukherjee
2015-08-10 13:54 ` [PATCH V2 0/4] staging: lustre: split checkpatch fix for remote_perm.c into series Swee Hua Law
2015-08-10 13:54 ` [PATCH V2 1/4] staging: lustre: checkpatch: do not init global to NULL Swee Hua Law
2015-08-10 13:54 ` [PATCH V2 2/4] staging: lustre: checkpatch: symbol == NULL should be !symbol Swee Hua Law
2015-08-10 13:54 ` [PATCH V2 3/4] staging: lustre: checkpatch: move */ block comment to next line Swee Hua Law
2015-08-10 13:54 ` Swee Hua Law [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1439214858-2994-5-git-send-email-sweehua81@gmail.com \
--to=sweehua81@gmail.com \
--cc=HPDD-discuss@ml01.01.org \
--cc=Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr \
--cc=andreas.dilger@intel.com \
--cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
--cc=elfring@users.sourceforge.net \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux.kernel@junien.fridrick.net \
--cc=oleg.drokin@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox