From: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
To: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
Qipeng Zha <qipeng.zha@intel.com>,
Huiquan Zhong <huiquan.zhong@intel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] pwm: lpss: Add support for multiple PWMs
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2015 16:53:05 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1445349187-114759-1-git-send-email-mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> (raw)
New Intel SoCs such as Broxton will have four PWMs per PCI (or ACPI)
device. Each PWM has 1k of register space allocated from the parent device.
Add support for this.
Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
---
drivers/pwm/pwm-lpss.c | 48 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
drivers/pwm/pwm-lpss.h | 1 +
2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-lpss.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-lpss.c
index e9798253a16f..e7392bdfdd18 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-lpss.c
+++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-lpss.c
@@ -29,6 +29,9 @@
#define PWM_LIMIT (0x8000 + PWM_DIVISION_CORRECTION)
#define NSECS_PER_SEC 1000000000UL
+/* Size of each PWM register space if multiple */
+#define PWM_SIZE 0x400
+
struct pwm_lpss_chip {
struct pwm_chip chip;
void __iomem *regs;
@@ -37,13 +40,15 @@ struct pwm_lpss_chip {
/* BayTrail */
const struct pwm_lpss_boardinfo pwm_lpss_byt_info = {
- .clk_rate = 25000000
+ .clk_rate = 25000000,
+ .npwm = 1,
};
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pwm_lpss_byt_info);
/* Braswell */
const struct pwm_lpss_boardinfo pwm_lpss_bsw_info = {
- .clk_rate = 19200000
+ .clk_rate = 19200000,
+ .npwm = 1,
};
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pwm_lpss_bsw_info);
@@ -52,6 +57,20 @@ static inline struct pwm_lpss_chip *to_lpwm(struct pwm_chip *chip)
return container_of(chip, struct pwm_lpss_chip, chip);
}
+static inline u32 pwm_lpss_read(const struct pwm_device *pwm)
+{
+ struct pwm_lpss_chip *lpwm = to_lpwm(pwm->chip);
+
+ return readl(lpwm->regs + pwm->hwpwm * PWM_SIZE + PWM);
+}
+
+static inline void pwm_lpss_write(const struct pwm_device *pwm, u32 value)
+{
+ struct pwm_lpss_chip *lpwm = to_lpwm(pwm->chip);
+
+ writel(value, lpwm->regs + pwm->hwpwm * PWM_SIZE + PWM);
+}
+
static int pwm_lpss_config(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
int duty_ns, int period_ns)
{
@@ -79,38 +98,30 @@ static int pwm_lpss_config(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
duty_ns = 1;
on_time_div = 255 - (255 * duty_ns / period_ns);
- ctrl = readl(lpwm->regs + PWM);
+ ctrl = pwm_lpss_read(pwm);
ctrl &= ~(PWM_BASE_UNIT_MASK | PWM_ON_TIME_DIV_MASK);
ctrl |= (u16) base_unit << PWM_BASE_UNIT_SHIFT;
ctrl |= on_time_div;
/* request PWM to update on next cycle */
ctrl |= PWM_SW_UPDATE;
- writel(ctrl, lpwm->regs + PWM);
+ pwm_lpss_write(pwm, ctrl);
return 0;
}
static int pwm_lpss_enable(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm)
{
- struct pwm_lpss_chip *lpwm = to_lpwm(chip);
- u32 ctrl;
-
- ctrl = readl(lpwm->regs + PWM);
- writel(ctrl | PWM_ENABLE, lpwm->regs + PWM);
-
+ pwm_lpss_write(pwm, pwm_lpss_read(pwm) | PWM_ENABLE);
return 0;
}
static void pwm_lpss_disable(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm)
{
- struct pwm_lpss_chip *lpwm = to_lpwm(chip);
- u32 ctrl;
-
- ctrl = readl(lpwm->regs + PWM);
- writel(ctrl & ~PWM_ENABLE, lpwm->regs + PWM);
+ pwm_lpss_write(pwm, pwm_lpss_read(pwm) & ~PWM_ENABLE);
}
static const struct pwm_ops pwm_lpss_ops = {
+ .free = pwm_lpss_disable,
.config = pwm_lpss_config,
.enable = pwm_lpss_enable,
.disable = pwm_lpss_disable,
@@ -135,7 +146,7 @@ struct pwm_lpss_chip *pwm_lpss_probe(struct device *dev, struct resource *r,
lpwm->chip.dev = dev;
lpwm->chip.ops = &pwm_lpss_ops;
lpwm->chip.base = -1;
- lpwm->chip.npwm = 1;
+ lpwm->chip.npwm = info->npwm;
ret = pwmchip_add(&lpwm->chip);
if (ret) {
@@ -149,11 +160,6 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pwm_lpss_probe);
int pwm_lpss_remove(struct pwm_lpss_chip *lpwm)
{
- u32 ctrl;
-
- ctrl = readl(lpwm->regs + PWM);
- writel(ctrl & ~PWM_ENABLE, lpwm->regs + PWM);
-
return pwmchip_remove(&lpwm->chip);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pwm_lpss_remove);
diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-lpss.h b/drivers/pwm/pwm-lpss.h
index aa041bb1b67d..ef2419f47c57 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-lpss.h
+++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-lpss.h
@@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ struct pwm_lpss_chip;
struct pwm_lpss_boardinfo {
unsigned long clk_rate;
+ size_t npwm;
};
extern const struct pwm_lpss_boardinfo pwm_lpss_byt_info;
--
2.6.1
next reply other threads:[~2015-10-20 13:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-20 13:53 Mika Westerberg [this message]
2015-10-20 13:53 ` [PATCH 2/3] pwm: lpss: Support all four PWMs on Intel Broxton Mika Westerberg
2015-10-20 13:53 ` [PATCH 3/3] pwm: lpss: Add more Intel Broxton IDs Mika Westerberg
2015-11-06 9:15 ` [PATCH 1/3] pwm: lpss: Add support for multiple PWMs Mika Westerberg
2015-11-06 13:29 ` Thierry Reding
2015-11-06 13:36 ` Mika Westerberg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1445349187-114759-1-git-send-email-mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--to=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=huiquan.zhong@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=qipeng.zha@intel.com \
--cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox