public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "J . A . Magallon" <jamagallon@able.es>
To: drew@drewb.com
Cc: evaner@bigfoot.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: The advantage of modules?
Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2001 11:02:15 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010106110215.C4393@werewolf.able.es> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20010105225020.A1188@evaner.penguinpowered.com> <14934.44472.612519.658729@champ.drew.net>
In-Reply-To: <14934.44472.612519.658729@champ.drew.net>; from drew@drewb.com on Sat, Jan 06, 2001 at 06:31:36 +0100


On 2001.01.06 Drew Bertola wrote:
> My best reasons are...
> 
> Development: You don't have to recompile the kernel a billion times
> while working on a driver, you just recompile the module.  Also, you
> can debug, unload, fix, recompile, reload a module to add or fix
> pieces of it all (hopefully) without rebooting.
> 
> Practical usage: When I take my laptop on the road I use ppp, so I
> load it then.  Most of the time I don't need it, so I don't load it.
> 

Usage: I have seen drivers which require params to work, and you can
only give params if the driver is built as a module (ie,
modprobe xxxxxx io=0x300 irq=5, etc...) because your hard is not
properly autodetected by the module.

-- 
J.A. Magallon                                         $> cd pub
mailto:jamagallon@able.es                             $> more beer

Linux werewolf 2.4.0-ac2 #6 SMP Sat Jan 6 01:38:26 CET 2001 i686

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

  reply	other threads:[~2001-01-06 10:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-01-06  4:50 The advantage of modules? Evan Thompson
2001-01-06  5:31 ` Drew Bertola
2001-01-06 10:02   ` J . A . Magallon [this message]
2001-01-08 16:49     ` Michael Meissner
2001-01-08 16:47 ` Michael Meissner
2001-01-08 18:26   ` Ookhoi
2001-01-08 19:05     ` Michael Meissner
2001-01-08 21:50       ` Russell King
2001-01-08 22:16         ` Dan Hollis
2001-01-08 22:14           ` Russell King
2001-01-08 22:40             ` Dan Hollis
2001-01-08 23:06               ` Richard B. Johnson
2001-01-08 23:49                 ` Alan Cox

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20010106110215.C4393@werewolf.able.es \
    --to=jamagallon@able.es \
    --cc=drew@drewb.com \
    --cc=evaner@bigfoot.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox