public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: goemon@anime.net (Dan Hollis)
Cc: meissner@spectacle-pond.org (Michael Meissner),
	ookhoi@dds.nl (Ookhoi),
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: The advantage of modules?
Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2001 22:14:25 +0000 (GMT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200101082214.WAA00962@raistlin.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0101081414020.19299-100000@anime.net> from "Dan Hollis" at Jan 08, 2001 02:16:05 PM

Dan Hollis writes:
> On Mon, 8 Jan 2001, Russell King wrote:
> > I don't believe that is what it's trying to say.  There have been instances
> > in the past where unplugging a SCSI device from a powered on SCSI bus can
> > result in blown terminator power fuses and the like.  Whether this still
> > applies today, I don't know (are active terminators better or worse than
> > passive when it comes to this type of thing?)
> 
> The term SCSI is depreciated as purely a physical layer. We talk SCSI over
> many different physical layers (1394, usb, ata). Of course many of these
> support hot plug natively.

And can you please explain how I can attach this USB Zip drive to this
50-wire SCSI bus please?  Or would you prefer me to call it a bus?
Something with 4 wheels maybe?  Maybe we should depreciate the term "bus"
as well just to remove that confusion. ;)

Seriously though, you can't depreciate a term for referring to a type of
bus without providing some other term to describe said bus.
   _____
  |_____| ------------------------------------------------- ---+---+-
  |   |         Russell King        rmk@arm.linux.org.uk      --- ---
  | | | | http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/personal/aboutme.html   /  /  |
  | +-+-+                                                     --- -+-
  /   |               THE developer of ARM Linux              |+| /|\
 /  | | |                                                     ---  |
    +-+-+ -------------------------------------------------  /\\\  |
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

  reply	other threads:[~2001-01-08 22:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-01-06  4:50 The advantage of modules? Evan Thompson
2001-01-06  5:31 ` Drew Bertola
2001-01-06 10:02   ` J . A . Magallon
2001-01-08 16:49     ` Michael Meissner
2001-01-08 16:47 ` Michael Meissner
2001-01-08 18:26   ` Ookhoi
2001-01-08 19:05     ` Michael Meissner
2001-01-08 21:50       ` Russell King
2001-01-08 22:16         ` Dan Hollis
2001-01-08 22:14           ` Russell King [this message]
2001-01-08 22:40             ` Dan Hollis
2001-01-08 23:06               ` Richard B. Johnson
2001-01-08 23:49                 ` Alan Cox

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200101082214.WAA00962@raistlin.arm.linux.org.uk \
    --to=rmk@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=goemon@anime.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=meissner@spectacle-pond.org \
    --cc=ookhoi@dds.nl \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox