From: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: goemon@anime.net (Dan Hollis)
Cc: meissner@spectacle-pond.org (Michael Meissner),
ookhoi@dds.nl (Ookhoi),
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: The advantage of modules?
Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2001 22:14:25 +0000 (GMT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200101082214.WAA00962@raistlin.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0101081414020.19299-100000@anime.net> from "Dan Hollis" at Jan 08, 2001 02:16:05 PM
Dan Hollis writes:
> On Mon, 8 Jan 2001, Russell King wrote:
> > I don't believe that is what it's trying to say. There have been instances
> > in the past where unplugging a SCSI device from a powered on SCSI bus can
> > result in blown terminator power fuses and the like. Whether this still
> > applies today, I don't know (are active terminators better or worse than
> > passive when it comes to this type of thing?)
>
> The term SCSI is depreciated as purely a physical layer. We talk SCSI over
> many different physical layers (1394, usb, ata). Of course many of these
> support hot plug natively.
And can you please explain how I can attach this USB Zip drive to this
50-wire SCSI bus please? Or would you prefer me to call it a bus?
Something with 4 wheels maybe? Maybe we should depreciate the term "bus"
as well just to remove that confusion. ;)
Seriously though, you can't depreciate a term for referring to a type of
bus without providing some other term to describe said bus.
_____
|_____| ------------------------------------------------- ---+---+-
| | Russell King rmk@arm.linux.org.uk --- ---
| | | | http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/personal/aboutme.html / / |
| +-+-+ --- -+-
/ | THE developer of ARM Linux |+| /|\
/ | | | --- |
+-+-+ ------------------------------------------------- /\\\ |
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-01-08 22:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-01-06 4:50 The advantage of modules? Evan Thompson
2001-01-06 5:31 ` Drew Bertola
2001-01-06 10:02 ` J . A . Magallon
2001-01-08 16:49 ` Michael Meissner
2001-01-08 16:47 ` Michael Meissner
2001-01-08 18:26 ` Ookhoi
2001-01-08 19:05 ` Michael Meissner
2001-01-08 21:50 ` Russell King
2001-01-08 22:16 ` Dan Hollis
2001-01-08 22:14 ` Russell King [this message]
2001-01-08 22:40 ` Dan Hollis
2001-01-08 23:06 ` Richard B. Johnson
2001-01-08 23:49 ` Alan Cox
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200101082214.WAA00962@raistlin.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=rmk@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=goemon@anime.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=meissner@spectacle-pond.org \
--cc=ookhoi@dds.nl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox