From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: suresh.b.siddha@intel.com
Cc: akpm@osdl.org, hugh@veritas.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
asit.k.mallick@intel.com
Subject: Re: [patch] mm: fix a race condition under SMC + COW
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 15:54:42 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060927.155442.71092068.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060927151507.A12423@unix-os.sc.intel.com>
From: "Siddha, Suresh B" <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 15:15:07 -0700
> From: "Siddha, Suresh B" <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
>
> Failing context is a multi threaded process context and the failing
> sequence is as follows.
>
> One thread T0 doing self modifying code on page X on processor P0 and
> another thread T1 doing COW (breaking the COW setup as part of just happened
> fork() in another thread T2) on the same page X on processor P1. T0 doing SMC
> can endup modifying the new page Y (allocated by the T1 doing COW on P1) but
> because of different I/D TLB's, P0 ITLB will not see the new mapping till
> the flush TLB IPI from P1 is received. During this interval, if T0 executes
> the code created by SMC it can result in an app error (as ITLB still points to
> old page X and endup executing the content in page X rather than using
> the content in page Y).
>
> Fix this issue by first clearing the PTE and flushing it, before updating it
> with new entry.
>
> Signed-off-by: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
You can't really do a set_pte_at() in this code path because
there isn't a subsequent flush_tlb_*().
This is needed because some architectures queue up all set_pte_at()
calls until the next flush_tlb_*() in order to batch TLB flushes.
PowerPC and Sparc64 both do this.
The pte_establish() in the existing code works fine because it takes
care of the set_pte_at() and flush_tlb_*() work internally when
necessary on a given platform.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-09-27 22:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-09-27 22:15 [patch] mm: fix a race condition under SMC + COW Siddha, Suresh B
2006-09-27 22:54 ` David Miller [this message]
2006-09-28 0:23 ` Siddha, Suresh B
2006-09-28 1:55 ` David Miller
2006-09-28 19:39 ` Hugh Dickins
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060927.155442.71092068.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=asit.k.mallick@intel.com \
--cc=hugh@veritas.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox