public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	Bill Huey <billh@gnuppy.monkey.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jason Baron <jbaron@redhat.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] lockdep: lock contention tracking
Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 12:58:03 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070521105803.GA17096@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070521095547.GA10697@infradead.org>


* Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> wrote:

> On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 11:36:39AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > you got the history wrong i think: the first version of lockdep was 
> > released to lkml a year ago (May 2006), while the first time you 
> > mentioned your lock contention patch was November 2006 and you released 
> > it to lkml in December 2006 - so it was _you_ who was "replicating the 
> > same work", not lockdep :-) And this was pointed out to you very early 
> > on, many months ago.
> 
> And lockmeter, the very first patch of this sort is from the 90s, but 
> got mostly ignored here on lkml, of course :)

i certainly did not ignore lockmeter - i periodically tried it and even 
considered adding it to -rt. But it was always pretty problematic from 
an impact POV:

  23 files changed, 2659 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

and nobody pushed strong enough to get it included. But ... Peter's 
patch could perhaps be extended to cover similar stats as lockmeter, 
ontop of the existing lockdep instrumentation. Peter, can you see any 
particular roadblocks with that?

	Ingo

  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-05-21 10:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-05-20 10:30 [PATCH] lockdep: lock contention tracking Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-20 18:05 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-05-21  6:04 ` Bill Huey
2007-05-21  6:08   ` Ingo Molnar
2007-05-21  6:41     ` Bill Huey
2007-05-21  7:50       ` Ingo Molnar
2007-05-21  9:18         ` Bill Huey
2007-05-21  9:36           ` Ingo Molnar
2007-05-21  9:55             ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-05-21 10:21               ` Bill Huey
2007-05-21 10:58               ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2007-05-21 19:17                 ` Bill Huey
2007-05-21 10:19             ` Bill Huey
2007-05-21 10:28               ` Bill Huey
2007-05-21 12:46               ` Ingo Molnar
2007-05-21 19:09                 ` Bill Huey
2007-05-21 20:58 ` Jason Baron

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070521105803.GA17096@elte.hu \
    --to=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=billh@gnuppy.monkey.org \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=jbaron@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox