public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Bill Huey <billh@gnuppy.monkey.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jason Baron <jbaron@redhat.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] lockdep: lock contention tracking
Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 14:46:55 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070521124655.GA411@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070521101946.GC4593@gnuppy.monkey.org>


* Bill Huey <billh@gnuppy.monkey.org> wrote:

> > and regarding C99 style lock initializers: the -rt project has been 
> > removing a whole heap of them in the past 2.5 years, since Oct 2004 
> > or so, and regularly cleansed the upstream kernel for old-style 
> > initializers ever since then - so i'm not sure what you are 
> > referring to.
> 
> Don't worry about it. I did the same work only to realize that there 
> wasn't much left to convert over.

i dont worry about it the least, i only replied to this sentence of 
yours:

> > > I write lockstat without the knowledge that lockdep was 
> > > replicating the same work and I audited 1600 something lock points 
> > > in the kernel to convert the usage of C99 style initializers to 
> > > something more regular.

which combines into this statement of yours: "I audited 1600 something 
lock points in the kernel to convert the usage of C99 style initializers 
something more regular, only to find out that there wasn't much left to 
convert over?", correct? Which begs the question: why did you mention 
this then at all? I usually reply to points made by others in the 
assumption that there's some meaning behind them ;-)

	Ingo

  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-05-21 12:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-05-20 10:30 [PATCH] lockdep: lock contention tracking Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-20 18:05 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-05-21  6:04 ` Bill Huey
2007-05-21  6:08   ` Ingo Molnar
2007-05-21  6:41     ` Bill Huey
2007-05-21  7:50       ` Ingo Molnar
2007-05-21  9:18         ` Bill Huey
2007-05-21  9:36           ` Ingo Molnar
2007-05-21  9:55             ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-05-21 10:21               ` Bill Huey
2007-05-21 10:58               ` Ingo Molnar
2007-05-21 19:17                 ` Bill Huey
2007-05-21 10:19             ` Bill Huey
2007-05-21 10:28               ` Bill Huey
2007-05-21 12:46               ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2007-05-21 19:09                 ` Bill Huey
2007-05-21 20:58 ` Jason Baron

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070521124655.GA411@elte.hu \
    --to=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=billh@gnuppy.monkey.org \
    --cc=jbaron@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox