From: Nigel Cunningham <nigel@nigel.suspend2.net>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: nigel@suspend2.net, Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>,
pm list <linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>,
Oliver Neukum <oliver@neukum.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH -mm] PM: Do not sync from within the freezer during suspend to RAM
Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2007 21:37:57 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200707052137.58164.nigel@nigel.suspend2.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200707051328.50845.rjw@sisk.pl>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2006 bytes --]
Hi.
On Thursday 05 July 2007 21:28:49 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thursday, 5 July 2007 00:52, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> > On Thursday 05 July 2007 08:49:42 Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > On Thu 2007-07-05 08:48:15, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> > > > On Thursday 05 July 2007 00:58:58 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > > The syncing of filesystems from within the freezer in not needed for
> > suspend
> > > > to
> > > > > RAM. Change freeze_processes() so that it doesn't execute
sys_sync()
> > and
> > > > > introduce the "syncing" version of it to be called from the
hibernation
> > code
> > > > > paths.
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
> > > > > ---
> > > > > include/linux/freezer.h | 14 ++++++++++++--
> > > > > kernel/power/disk.c | 2 +-
> > > > > kernel/power/main.c | 6 ++++++
> > > > > kernel/power/process.c | 8 +++++---
> > > > > kernel/power/user.c | 2 +-
> > > > > 5 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > Looks ok, except that I wonder if you want the following fragment. It
> > looks to
> > > > me (looking at rc6) like with this code, you'll currently call
sys_sync
> > twice
> > > > when suspending to ram. Maybe I'm misreading it. Also, shouldn't it be
> > done
> > > > after taking the mutex?
> > >
> > > sys_sync() should be okay to call, mutex or not.
> >
> > Yeah. That wasn't my point, sorry. Calling sys_sync is pointless if you're
> > going to fail to take the mutex. It makes more sense to know you've got it
> > before you start doing things related to actually suspending.
>
> Well, that's a valid point, I'll move it under the mutex.
Okee doke.
> And why do you think it will be called twice?
Hmm. Looking again now, I can't see why I thought that. Maybe I just hadn't
had enough caffeine today at that stage :)
Nigel
--
See http://www.tuxonice.net for Howtos, FAQs, mailing
lists, wiki and bugzilla info.
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-07-05 11:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-07-04 14:58 [RFC][PATCH -mm] PM: Do not sync from within the freezer during suspend to RAM Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-07-04 22:48 ` Nigel Cunningham
2007-07-04 22:49 ` Pavel Machek
2007-07-04 22:52 ` Nigel Cunningham
2007-07-05 11:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-07-05 11:37 ` Nigel Cunningham [this message]
2007-07-05 20:31 ` [RFC][PATCH -mm] PM: Do not sync filesystems from within the freezer Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-07-05 22:00 ` Pavel Machek
2007-07-06 7:02 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-07-06 7:07 ` Nigel Cunningham
2007-07-06 7:13 ` Miklos Szeredi
2007-07-06 7:19 ` Nigel Cunningham
2007-07-06 7:36 ` Miklos Szeredi
2007-07-07 11:48 ` possible solution for problem 2 (was Re: [RFC][PATCH -mm] PM: Do not sync filesystems from within the freezer) Pavel Machek
2007-07-06 8:59 ` [RFC][PATCH -mm] PM: Do not sync filesystems from within the freezer Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-07-06 9:05 ` Miklos Szeredi
2007-07-06 9:13 ` Nigel Cunningham
2007-07-06 9:31 ` Miklos Szeredi
2007-07-06 10:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200707052137.58164.nigel@nigel.suspend2.net \
--to=nigel@nigel.suspend2.net \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=mjg59@srcf.ucam.org \
--cc=nigel@suspend2.net \
--cc=oliver@neukum.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox