From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Avi Kivity <avi@qumranet.com>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [patch] x86: make delay_tsc() preemptible again
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2007 11:50:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071116105056.GC5453@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1195205942.3059.1.camel@twins>
* Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
> > + prev_cpu = smp_processor_id();
> > rep_nop();
> > + preempt_enable();
>
> Why not have the rep_nop() here between the enable, and disable ?
yes, indeed - fixed.
> > + /*
> > + * If we preempted we skip this small amount of time:
> ^ migrated, perhaps?
yeah, fixed.
updated patch below.
Ingo
---------------->
Subject: x86: make delay_tsc() preemptible again
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
make delay_tsc() preemptible again.
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
---
arch/x86/lib/delay_32.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----
arch/x86/lib/delay_64.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++------
2 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
Index: linux/arch/x86/lib/delay_32.c
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/arch/x86/lib/delay_32.c
+++ linux/arch/x86/lib/delay_32.c
@@ -38,17 +38,34 @@ static void delay_loop(unsigned long loo
:"0" (loops));
}
-/* TSC based delay: */
+/*
+ * TSC based delay:
+ *
+ * We are careful about preemption as TSC's are per-CPU.
+ */
static void delay_tsc(unsigned long loops)
{
- unsigned long bclock, now;
+ unsigned long prev, now;
+ long left = loops;
+ int prev_cpu, cpu;
- preempt_disable(); /* TSC's are per-cpu */
- rdtscl(bclock);
+ preempt_disable();
+ rdtscl(prev);
do {
+ prev_cpu = smp_processor_id();
+ preempt_enable();
rep_nop();
+ preempt_disable();
+ cpu = smp_processor_id();
rdtscl(now);
- } while ((now-bclock) < loops);
+ /*
+ * If we migrated we skip this small amount of time:
+ */
+ if (prev_cpu != cpu)
+ prev = now;
+ left -= now - prev;
+ prev = now;
+ } while (left > 0);
preempt_enable();
}
Index: linux/arch/x86/lib/delay_64.c
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/arch/x86/lib/delay_64.c
+++ linux/arch/x86/lib/delay_64.c
@@ -26,17 +26,34 @@ int read_current_timer(unsigned long *ti
return 0;
}
+/*
+ * TSC based delay:
+ *
+ * We are careful about preemption as TSC's are per-CPU.
+ */
void __delay(unsigned long loops)
{
- unsigned bclock, now;
+ unsigned long prev, now;
+ long left = loops;
+ int prev_cpu, cpu;
- preempt_disable(); /* TSC's are pre-cpu */
- rdtscl(bclock);
+ preempt_disable();
+ rdtscl(prev);
do {
- rep_nop();
+ prev_cpu = smp_processor_id();
+ preempt_enable();
+ rep_nop();
+ preempt_disable();
+ cpu = smp_processor_id();
rdtscl(now);
- }
- while ((now-bclock) < loops);
+ /*
+ * If we migrated we skip this small amount of time:
+ */
+ if (prev_cpu != cpu)
+ prev = now;
+ left -= now - prev;
+ prev = now;
+ } while (left > 0);
preempt_enable();
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(__delay);
prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-11-16 10:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <200711150400.lAF40lIr020160@hera.kernel.org>
2007-11-16 3:41 ` x86: disable preemption in delay_tsc() Arjan van de Ven
2007-11-16 3:52 ` Andrew Morton
2007-11-16 6:13 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-11-16 7:08 ` Andrew Morton
2007-11-16 7:17 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-11-16 7:26 ` Andrew Morton
2007-11-16 8:08 ` Avi Kivity
2007-11-16 8:36 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-11-16 8:47 ` [patch] x86: make delay_tsc() preemptible again Ingo Molnar
2007-11-16 9:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-11-16 10:50 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20071116105056.GC5453@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=avi@qumranet.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox