From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com,
hpa@zytor.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.24-rc5 x86 architecture no longer Oopses...
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2007 02:42:11 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071221024211.f4207136.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071221102727.GB22452@elte.hu>
On Fri, 21 Dec 2007 11:27:27 +0100 Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:
> > local_read_flags().
> >
> > > that should have been raw_local_irq_save(flags)!
> >
> > So raw_local_save_flags() and raw_local_irq_save() have different semantics.
> >
> > omigawd, what have we done?
>
> i really tried to get this fixed years ago - but did not think of
> local_read_flags as a solution. The patch below fixes this.
>
> (if it's too burdensome to carry right now then i can regenerate this
> patch in 30 seconds in the 2.6.25 merge window - but please remind me
> then. Perhaps put in a patch into your queue that adds a comment to
> remind me :-) )
I'd suggest that we add a local_read_flags() along with local_save_flags().
Then I can merge the parts of the patch which don't get destroyed by ongoing
churn and then we can come in and clean up the stragglers later.
box:/usr/src/25> grep -l local_save_flags patches/*.patch
patches/git-perfmon.patch
patches/git-sh.patch
patches/git-x86.patch
patches/i386-use-raw_smp_processor_id-in-die.patch
patches/mn10300-add-the-mn10300-am33-architecture-to-the-kernel.patch
patches/origin.patch
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-12-21 10:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-12-20 22:40 Linux 2.6.24-rc5 x86 architecture no longer Oopses Trond Myklebust
2007-12-20 22:54 ` Andrew Morton
2007-12-20 22:56 ` Andrew Morton
2007-12-20 23:06 ` Trond Myklebust
2007-12-21 0:55 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-12-21 10:19 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-12-20 23:04 ` Trond Myklebust
2007-12-20 23:47 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-12-21 0:02 ` Andrew Morton
2007-12-21 0:05 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-12-21 0:19 ` Andrew Morton
2007-12-21 0:30 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-12-21 0:40 ` Andrew Morton
2007-12-21 0:44 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-12-21 10:27 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-12-21 10:42 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2007-12-21 11:12 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-12-21 11:34 ` Andrew Morton
2007-12-21 12:31 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20071221024211.f4207136.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox