From: Ravikiran G Thirumalai <kiran@scalex86.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Glauber de Oliveira Costa <gcosta@redhat.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>,
shai@scalex86.org
Subject: Re: [patch 1/4] x86: vSMP: Fix is_vsmp_box()
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2008 10:59:27 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080321175927.GC6085@localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080321091139.GD20420@elte.hu>
On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 10:11:39AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
>* Ravikiran G Thirumalai <kiran@scalex86.org> wrote:
>
>> >> /* Check if we are running on a ScaleMP vSMP box */
>> >> - if (read_pci_config(0, 0x1f, 0, PCI_VENDOR_ID) ==
>> >> - (PCI_VENDOR_ID_SCALEMP || (PCI_DEVICE_ID_SCALEMP_VSMP_CTL << 16)))
>> >> + if ((read_pci_config_16(0, 0x1f, 0, PCI_VENDOR_ID) ==
>> >> + PCI_VENDOR_ID_SCALEMP) &&
>> >> + (read_pci_config_16(0, 0x1f, 0, PCI_DEVICE_ID) ==
>> >> + PCI_DEVICE_ID_SCALEMP_VSMP_CTL))
>> >> vsmp = 1;
>> >>
>> >> return vsmp;
>> >
>> >why read two times
>> >
>>
>> Well, the pci cfg space read happens just _once_ during the boot, as
>> the result is cached in a static flag. The above code is better
>> readable. So readability is better than micro-optimization here.
>
>i think the patch below results in even more readable and a bit smaller
>
>code got a bit smaller:
>
>arch/x86/kernel/vsmp_64.o:
>
> text data bss dec hex filename
> 205 4 0 209 d1 vsmp_64.o.before
> 181 4 0 185 b9 vsmp_64.o.after
Wow! good to know that avoiding one call shaved so many bytes.
Agreed, the below patch is better.
Thanks,
Kiran
>
>Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
>---
> arch/x86/kernel/vsmp_64.c | 6 ++----
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
>Index: linux-x86.q/arch/x86/kernel/vsmp_64.c
>===================================================================
>--- linux-x86.q.orig/arch/x86/kernel/vsmp_64.c
>+++ linux-x86.q/arch/x86/kernel/vsmp_64.c
>@@ -120,10 +120,8 @@ int is_vsmp_box(void)
> return vsmp;
>
> /* Check if we are running on a ScaleMP vSMP box */
>- if ((read_pci_config_16(0, 0x1f, 0, PCI_VENDOR_ID) ==
>- PCI_VENDOR_ID_SCALEMP) &&
>- (read_pci_config_16(0, 0x1f, 0, PCI_DEVICE_ID) ==
>- PCI_DEVICE_ID_SCALEMP_VSMP_CTL))
>+ if (read_pci_config(0, 0x1f, 0, PCI_VENDOR_ID) ==
>+ (PCI_VENDOR_ID_SCALEMP | (PCI_DEVICE_ID_SCALEMP_VSMP_CTL << 16)))
> vsmp = 1;
>
> return vsmp;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-03-21 18:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-03-20 7:37 [patch 0/4] x86: vSMP updates Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2008-03-20 7:39 ` [patch 1/4] x86: vSMP: Fix is_vsmp_box() Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2008-03-20 7:44 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-03-20 18:40 ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2008-03-21 9:11 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-03-21 9:17 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-03-21 17:59 ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai [this message]
2008-03-20 7:41 ` [patch 2/4] x86: Fix build breakage when PCI is define and PARAVIRT is not Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2008-03-21 4:30 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-03-21 6:28 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-03-21 18:54 ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2008-03-22 2:19 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-03-20 7:43 ` [patch 3/4] x86: vSMP: Use pvops only if platform has the capability to support it Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2008-03-20 7:45 ` [patch 4/4] x86: apic_is_clustered_box to indicate unsynched TSC's on multiboard vSMP systems Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2008-03-20 7:53 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-03-20 19:02 ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2008-03-21 9:15 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-03-21 18:52 ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2008-03-21 18:58 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-03-22 18:59 ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2008-03-22 20:02 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-03-24 21:48 ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2008-03-25 15:50 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-03-21 8:54 ` [patch 0/4] x86: vSMP updates Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080321175927.GC6085@localdomain \
--to=kiran@scalex86.org \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=gcosta@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=shai@scalex86.org \
--cc=yhlu.kernel@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox