public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
To: Ravikiran G Thirumalai <kiran@scalex86.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Glauber de Oliveira Costa <gcosta@redhat.com>,
	Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>,
	shai@scalex86.org
Subject: Re: [patch 2/4] x86: Fix build breakage when PCI is define and PARAVIRT is not
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2008 21:30:09 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <47E339D1.3080509@goop.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080320074116.GC9414@localdomain>

Ravikiran G Thirumalai wrote:
> - Fix the the build breakage when PARAVIRT is defined
>   but PCI is not
>   This fixes problem reported at:
> 	http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=120525966600698&w=2
> - Make is_vsmp_box() available even when PARAVIRT is not defined.
>   This is needed to determine if tsc's are reliable as a time source
>   even when PARAVIRT is not defined.
> - split vsmp_init to use is_vsmp_box() and set_vsmp_pv_ops()
>   set_vsmp_pv_ops will do nothing if PCI is not enabled in the config.
>   

I'm a bit confused by all the config dependencies.  I had assumed that 
VSMP depended on both PCI and PARAVIRT.  Is this not actually true?  You 
can have a VSMP system without either or both of PCI/PARAVIRT?

The structure of the code suggests that at the very least VSMP depends 
on PCI (it never makes sense to enable VSMP on a non-PCI system), and 
therefore a number of your config decisions can just be predicated on VSMP.

> Signed-off-by: Ravikiran Thirumalai <kiran@scalex86.org>
>
> Index: linux.git.trees/arch/x86/kernel/Makefile
> ===================================================================
> --- linux.git.trees.orig/arch/x86/kernel/Makefile	2008-03-19 13:39:29.000000000 -0700
> +++ linux.git.trees/arch/x86/kernel/Makefile	2008-03-19 13:46:14.400935607 -0700
> @@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_KEXEC)		+= relocate_kernel_
>  obj-$(CONFIG_CRASH_DUMP)	+= crash_dump_$(BITS).o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_X86_NUMAQ)		+= numaq_32.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_X86_SUMMIT_NUMA)	+= summit_32.o
> -obj-$(CONFIG_PARAVIRT)		+= vsmp_64.o
> +obj-y				+= vsmp_64.o
>   

Couldn't this be make obj-$(CONFIG_X86_VSMP)?

>  obj-$(CONFIG_KPROBES)		+= kprobes.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_MODULES)		+= module_$(BITS).o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_ACPI_SRAT) 	+= srat_32.o
> Index: linux.git.trees/arch/x86/kernel/setup_64.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux.git.trees.orig/arch/x86/kernel/setup_64.c	2008-03-19 13:39:29.000000000 -0700
> +++ linux.git.trees/arch/x86/kernel/setup_64.c	2008-03-19 13:57:43.951337318 -0700
> @@ -353,9 +353,7 @@ void __init setup_arch(char **cmdline_p)
>  	if (efi_enabled)
>  		efi_init();
>  
> -#ifdef	CONFIG_PARAVIRT
>  	vsmp_init();
> -#endif
>  
>  	dmi_scan_machine();
>  
> Index: linux.git.trees/arch/x86/kernel/vsmp_64.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux.git.trees.orig/arch/x86/kernel/vsmp_64.c	2008-03-19 13:39:50.000000000 -0700
> +++ linux.git.trees/arch/x86/kernel/vsmp_64.c	2008-03-19 20:53:34.267707163 -0700
> @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
>  #include <asm/io.h>
>  #include <asm/paravirt.h>
>  
> +#if defined CONFIG_PCI && defined CONFIG_PARAVIRT
>  /*
>   * Interrupt control on vSMPowered systems:
>   * ~AC is a shadow of IF.  If IF is 'on' AC should be 'off'
> @@ -72,39 +73,11 @@ static unsigned __init vsmp_patch(u8 typ
>  
>  }
>  
> -static int vsmp = -1;
> -
> -int is_vsmp_box(void)
> -{
> -	if (vsmp != -1)
> -		return vsmp;
> -
> -	vsmp = 0;
> -	if (!early_pci_allowed())
> -		return vsmp;
> -
> -	/* Check if we are running on a ScaleMP vSMP box */
> -	if ((read_pci_config_16(0, 0x1f, 0, PCI_VENDOR_ID) ==
> -	     PCI_VENDOR_ID_SCALEMP) &&
> -	    (read_pci_config_16(0, 0x1f, 0, PCI_DEVICE_ID) ==
> -	    PCI_DEVICE_ID_SCALEMP_VSMP_CTL))
> -		vsmp = 1;
> -
> -	return vsmp;
> -}
> -
> -void __init vsmp_init(void)
> +static void __init set_vsmp_pv_ops(void)
>  {
>  	void *address;
>  	unsigned int cap, ctl, cfg;
>  
> -	if (!is_vsmp_box())
> -		return;
> -
> -	if (!early_pci_allowed())
> -		return;
> -
> -	/* If we are, use the distinguished irq functions */
>  	pv_irq_ops.irq_disable = vsmp_irq_disable;
>  	pv_irq_ops.irq_enable  = vsmp_irq_enable;
>  	pv_irq_ops.save_fl  = vsmp_save_fl;
> @@ -127,5 +100,46 @@ void __init vsmp_init(void)
>  	}
>  
>  	early_iounmap(address, 8);
> +}
> +#else
> +static void __init set_vsmp_pv_ops(void)
> +{
> +}
> +#endif
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PCI
> +static int vsmp = -1;
> +
> +int is_vsmp_box(void)
> +{
> +	if (vsmp != -1)
> +		return vsmp;
> +
> +	vsmp = 0;
> +	if (!early_pci_allowed())
> +		return vsmp;
> +
> +	/* Check if we are running on a ScaleMP vSMP box */
> +	if ((read_pci_config_16(0, 0x1f, 0, PCI_VENDOR_ID) ==
> +	     PCI_VENDOR_ID_SCALEMP) &&
> +	    (read_pci_config_16(0, 0x1f, 0, PCI_DEVICE_ID) ==
> +	    PCI_DEVICE_ID_SCALEMP_VSMP_CTL))
> +		vsmp = 1;
> +
> +	return vsmp;
> +}
> +#else
> +int is_vsmp_box(void)
> +{
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +#endif
>   

Rather than doing this, I'd propose putting

#ifndef CONFIG_X86_VSMP
static inline int is_vsmp_box(void)
{
    return 0;
}
#endif

in a header, and then making the definition in vsmp_64.c unconditional 
(or rather, the whole of vsmp_64.o conditional on CONFIG_X86_VSMP).

> +
> +void __init vsmp_init(void)
> +{
> +	if (!is_vsmp_box())
> +		return;
> +
> +	set_vsmp_pv_ops();
>  	return;
>  }
>   

Similarly with this.

> Index: linux.git.trees/include/asm-x86/apic.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux.git.trees.orig/include/asm-x86/apic.h	2008-03-19 13:39:29.000000000 -0700
> +++ linux.git.trees/include/asm-x86/apic.h	2008-03-19 13:57:14.550893819 -0700
> @@ -51,19 +51,16 @@ extern unsigned boot_cpu_id;
>   */
>  #ifdef CONFIG_PARAVIRT
>  #include <asm/paravirt.h>
> -extern int is_vsmp_box(void);
>  #else
>  #define apic_write native_apic_write
>  #define apic_write_atomic native_apic_write_atomic
>  #define apic_read native_apic_read
>  #define setup_boot_clock setup_boot_APIC_clock
>  #define setup_secondary_clock setup_secondary_APIC_clock
> -static int inline is_vsmp_box(void)
> -{
> -	return 0;
> -}
>  #endif
>  
> +extern int is_vsmp_box(void);
> +
>   

This was almost right, except it should have been in a #ifdef 
CONFIG_X86_VSMP block.

    J

  reply	other threads:[~2008-03-21  4:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-03-20  7:37 [patch 0/4] x86: vSMP updates Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2008-03-20  7:39 ` [patch 1/4] x86: vSMP: Fix is_vsmp_box() Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2008-03-20  7:44   ` Yinghai Lu
2008-03-20 18:40     ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2008-03-21  9:11       ` Ingo Molnar
2008-03-21  9:17         ` Yinghai Lu
2008-03-21 17:59         ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2008-03-20  7:41 ` [patch 2/4] x86: Fix build breakage when PCI is define and PARAVIRT is not Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2008-03-21  4:30   ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge [this message]
2008-03-21  6:28     ` Yinghai Lu
2008-03-21 18:54     ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2008-03-22  2:19       ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-03-20  7:43 ` [patch 3/4] x86: vSMP: Use pvops only if platform has the capability to support it Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2008-03-20  7:45 ` [patch 4/4] x86: apic_is_clustered_box to indicate unsynched TSC's on multiboard vSMP systems Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2008-03-20  7:53   ` Yinghai Lu
2008-03-20 19:02     ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2008-03-21  9:15       ` Ingo Molnar
2008-03-21 18:52         ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2008-03-21 18:58           ` Ingo Molnar
2008-03-22 18:59             ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2008-03-22 20:02               ` Ingo Molnar
2008-03-24 21:48                 ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2008-03-25 15:50                   ` Ingo Molnar
2008-03-21  8:54 ` [patch 0/4] x86: vSMP updates Ingo Molnar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=47E339D1.3080509@goop.org \
    --to=jeremy@goop.org \
    --cc=ak@suse.de \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=gcosta@redhat.com \
    --cc=kiran@scalex86.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=shai@scalex86.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox