public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@linux-mips.org>
Cc: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de>, Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
	linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>,
	Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>,
	Tom Long Nguyen <tom.l.nguyen@intel.com>,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net>,
	Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: PCI MSI breaks when booting with nosmp
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 11:32:18 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200804231132.19874.jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200804231123.46506.jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>

On Wednesday, April 23, 2008 11:23 am Jesse Barnes wrote:
> On Wednesday, April 23, 2008 11:13 am Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
> > On Wed, 23 Apr 2008, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > > Yeah I think the patch is reasonable, would be good to get feedback
> > > from Thomas/Andi/Ingo though...
> >
> >  FWIW, the original idea behind "nosmp" or "maxcpus=0" (just as an
> > implementation detail) vs "maxcpus=1" was that the two formers would
> > disable the APIC circuitry altogether (including resisting from switching
> > from the PIC compatibility mode on systems supporting it), while the
> > latter would still boot UP, but with interrupts routed through the APICs.
> > Essentially SMP implied all the MP circuitry/provisions in this context,
> > the APICs being an inherent part of which.  Therefore I think the
> > original idea of implying "pci=nomsi" with "nosmp" certainly looks more
> > in the spirit of the original setup to me.
> >
> >  However we have "nolapic" these days as well and with this new proposal
> > this option could effectively take over the old meaning of "nosmp" (you
> > cannot do SMP without the local APIC, so "nolapic nosmp" is redundant).
> > I am not entirely convinced it is the right way though...
>
> Yeah, I'm not particularly attached to either meaning.  It looks like we'll
> setup the local apic on 32 bit if the NMI vector is a local apic one, so in
> that case at least the behavior will be the same.
>
> Anyway, we have two options:
>   1) make nosmp/maxcpus=1 imply nolapic (and therefore disable MSI too)
>   2) make nosmp enable the lapic (so MSI will work)

Err, nosmp/maxcpus=0...

  reply	other threads:[~2008-04-23 18:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-04-17 19:40 PCI MSI breaks when booting with nosmp Jean Delvare
2008-04-17 20:08 ` Jesse Barnes
2008-04-17 20:25   ` Jean Delvare
2008-04-21 17:43     ` Jesse Barnes
2008-04-21 18:45       ` Andi Kleen
2008-04-21 19:06         ` Jesse Barnes
2008-04-21 19:35           ` Jesse Barnes
2008-04-21 19:41           ` Andi Kleen
2008-04-21 19:43         ` Pavel Machek
2008-04-21 19:44           ` Andi Kleen
2008-04-22 21:25             ` Pavel Machek
2008-04-22 23:07               ` Jesse Barnes
2008-04-21 20:20         ` Jean Delvare
2008-04-21 20:40           ` Jesse Barnes
2008-04-21 20:46           ` Andi Kleen
2008-04-21 20:48             ` Jean Delvare
2008-04-21 21:09               ` Andi Kleen
2008-04-21 21:14                 ` Jesse Barnes
2008-04-22 13:27                   ` Jean Delvare
2008-04-22 15:50                     ` Jesse Barnes
2008-04-23 14:38                   ` Jean Delvare
2008-04-23 15:12                     ` Jesse Barnes
2008-04-23 18:13                       ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2008-04-23 18:23                         ` Jesse Barnes
2008-04-23 18:32                           ` Jesse Barnes [this message]
2008-04-23 18:32                           ` Jean Delvare
2008-04-23 18:38                           ` Maciej W. Rozycki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200804231132.19874.jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
    --to=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
    --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=htejun@gmail.com \
    --cc=jdelvare@suse.de \
    --cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz \
    --cc=macro@linux-mips.org \
    --cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
    --cc=rdunlap@xenotime.net \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tom.l.nguyen@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox