From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: x86 team <x86@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Arjan van de Veen <arjan@infradead.org>,
Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
Alok N Kataria <akataria@vmware.com>,
Pan Jacob jun <jacob.jun.pan@intel.com>
Subject: [RFC patch 28/32] x86: time_32/64.c unify profile_pc
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 21:32:01 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090821205603.173685499@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20090821205008.518392436@linutronix.de
[-- Attachment #1: x86-time-unify-profiling.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 2200 bytes --]
The code is identical except for the formatting and a useless
#ifdef. Make it the same.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
---
arch/x86/kernel/time_32.c | 13 ++++++-------
arch/x86/kernel/time_64.c | 8 +++++---
2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
Index: linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/time_32.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/arch/x86/kernel/time_32.c
+++ linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/time_32.c
@@ -33,23 +33,22 @@ unsigned long profile_pc(struct pt_regs
{
unsigned long pc = instruction_pointer(regs);
-#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
if (!user_mode_vm(regs) && in_lock_functions(pc)) {
#ifdef CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER
return *(unsigned long *)(regs->bp + sizeof(long));
#else
- unsigned long *sp = (unsigned long *)®s->sp;
-
- /* Return address is either directly at stack pointer
- or above a saved flags. Eflags has bits 22-31 zero,
- kernel addresses don't. */
+ unsigned long *sp = (unsigned long *)regs->sp;
+ /*
+ * Return address is either directly at stack pointer
+ * or above a saved flags. Eflags has bits 22-31 zero,
+ * kernel addresses don't.
+ */
if (sp[0] >> 22)
return sp[0];
if (sp[1] >> 22)
return sp[1];
#endif
}
-#endif
return pc;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(profile_pc);
Index: linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/time_64.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/arch/x86/kernel/time_64.c
+++ linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/time_64.c
@@ -33,14 +33,16 @@ unsigned long profile_pc(struct pt_regs
{
unsigned long pc = instruction_pointer(regs);
- /* Assume the lock function has either no stack frame or a copy
- of flags from PUSHF
- Eflags always has bits 22 and up cleared unlike kernel addresses. */
if (!user_mode_vm(regs) && in_lock_functions(pc)) {
#ifdef CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER
return *(unsigned long *)(regs->bp + sizeof(long));
#else
unsigned long *sp = (unsigned long *)regs->sp;
+ /*
+ * Return address is either directly at stack pointer
+ * or above a saved flags. Eflags has bits 22-31 zero,
+ * kernel addresses don't.
+ */
if (sp[0] >> 22)
return sp[0];
if (sp[1] >> 22)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-21 21:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-21 21:29 [RFC patch 00/32] x86: Refactor the setup code to provide a base for embedded platforms Thomas Gleixner
2009-08-21 21:29 ` [RFC patch 01/32] x86: Add platform_setup infrastructure Thomas Gleixner
2009-08-21 21:29 ` [RFC patch 02/32] x86: Add probe_roms to platform_setup Thomas Gleixner
2009-08-21 22:23 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-08-21 22:36 ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-08-28 21:52 ` [RFC PATCH 0/7] x86/boot: Moorestown patch set based on platform_set abstraction Pan, Jacob jun
2009-08-29 16:59 ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-08-28 21:52 ` [RFC PATCH 2/7] x86: introduce a set of platform feature flags Pan, Jacob jun
2009-08-28 21:52 ` [RFC PATCH 3/7] x86: add moorestown specific platform setup code Pan, Jacob jun
2009-08-29 17:20 ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-08-28 21:53 ` [RFC PATCH 4/7] x86/apbt: Moorestown APB system timer driver Pan, Jacob jun
2009-08-28 21:53 ` [RFC PATCH 5/7] x86/apic: decouple legacy irq handling in ioapic Pan, Jacob jun
2009-08-28 21:53 ` [RFC PATCH 6/7] x86/apic: Early setup IOAPIC for APB timer Pan, Jacob jun
2009-08-28 21:53 ` [RFC PATCH 7/7] x86: add more platform_setup functions Pan, Jacob jun
2009-08-29 17:31 ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-08-21 21:29 ` [RFC patch 03/32] x86: Add request_standard_resources to platform_setup Thomas Gleixner
2009-08-21 21:29 ` [RFC patch 04/32] x86: Add reserve_ebda_region " Thomas Gleixner
2009-08-21 21:29 ` [RFC patch 05/32] x86: Move memory_setup to platform Thomas Gleixner
2009-08-21 21:29 ` [RFC patch 06/32] x86: Sanitize smp_record and move it to platform_setup Thomas Gleixner
2009-08-21 21:30 ` [RFC patch 07/32] x86: Move ioapic_ids_setup " Thomas Gleixner
2009-08-21 21:30 ` [RFC patch 08/32] x86: Move mpc_apic_id " Thomas Gleixner
2009-08-21 21:30 ` [RFC patch 09/32] x86: Move smp_read_mpc_oem " Thomas Gleixner
2009-08-21 21:30 ` [RFC patch 10/32] x86: Move mpc_oem_pci_bus " Thomas Gleixner
2009-08-21 21:30 ` [RFC patch 11/32] x86: Move oem_bus_info " Thomas Gleixner
2009-08-21 21:30 ` [RFC patch 12/32] x86: Move get/find_smp_config " Thomas Gleixner
2009-08-21 21:30 ` [RFC patch 13/32] x86: Move pre_intr_init " Thomas Gleixner
2009-08-21 21:30 ` [RFC patch 14/32] x86: Move irq_init " Thomas Gleixner
2009-08-21 21:30 ` [RFC patch 15/32] x86: Move traps_init " Thomas Gleixner
2009-08-21 21:30 ` [RFC patch 16/32] x86: Replace ARCH_SETUP by a proper platform function Thomas Gleixner
2009-08-21 22:30 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-08-21 23:42 ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-08-28 21:52 ` [PATCH 1/7] x86/boot: adding hw subarch ID for Moorestown Pan, Jacob jun
2009-08-29 16:58 ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-08-21 21:30 ` [RFC patch 17/32] x86: Move paravirt banner printout to platform Thomas Gleixner
2009-08-21 21:30 ` [RFC patch 18/32] x86: Move paravirt pagetable_setup " Thomas Gleixner
2009-08-21 21:31 ` [RFC patch 19/32] x86: Move xen_post_allocator_init into xen_pagetable_setup_done Thomas Gleixner
2009-08-21 21:31 ` [RFC patch 20/32] x86: Move percpu clockevents setup to platform Thomas Gleixner
2009-08-21 21:31 ` [RFC patch 21/32] x86: Add timer_init " Thomas Gleixner
2009-08-24 6:48 ` Andrey Panin
2009-08-21 21:31 ` [RFC patch 22/32] x86: Remove do_timer hook Thomas Gleixner
2009-08-21 21:31 ` [RFC patch 23/32] x86: Prepare unification of time_32/64.c Thomas Gleixner
2009-08-21 21:31 ` [RFC patch 24/32] x86: Simplify timer_ack magic in time_32.c Thomas Gleixner
2009-08-21 21:31 ` [RFC patch 25/32] x86: Remove mca bus ifdef from timer interrupt Thomas Gleixner
2009-08-21 21:31 ` [RFC patch 26/32] x86: Make timer setup and global variables the same in time_32/64.c Thomas Gleixner
2009-08-21 21:31 ` [RFC patch 27/32] x86: Move calibrate_cpu to tsc.c Thomas Gleixner
2009-08-21 21:32 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2009-08-21 21:32 ` [RFC patch 29/32] x86: Replace the now identical time_32/64.c by time.c Thomas Gleixner
2009-08-21 21:32 ` [RFC patch 30/32] x86: Move tsc_calibration to platform Thomas Gleixner
2009-08-21 21:32 ` [RFC patch 31/32] init: Move sched_clock_init after late_time_init Thomas Gleixner
2009-08-21 21:32 ` [RFC patch 32/32] x86: Move tsc_init to late_time_init Thomas Gleixner
2009-08-21 22:19 ` [RFC patch 00/32] x86: Refactor the setup code to provide a base for embedded platforms Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-08-22 10:57 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-08-23 9:15 ` Thomas Gleixner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090821205603.173685499@linutronix.de \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=akataria@vmware.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=jacob.jun.pan@intel.com \
--cc=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox