public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, x86 team <x86@kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Arjan van de Veen <arjan@infradead.org>,
	Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
	Alok N Kataria <akataria@vmware.com>,
	Pan Jacob jun <jacob.jun.pan@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC patch 02/32] x86: Add probe_roms to platform_setup
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 15:23:09 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A8F1E4D.9080409@goop.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090821205601.878468441@linutronix.de>

On 08/21/09 14:29, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
[argh attachments]
> probe_roms is only used on 32bit. Add it to the platform_setup code
> and remove the #ifdefs.
>
> Default initializer is platform_setup_noop() which is overridden in
> the 32bit boot code.
>
>   

I realize you're aiming to make this transform have no functional
side-effects, but is there a good reason why probe_roms *couldn't* be
done in 64-bit?  It seems to me that its useful for coverage
completeness to have the 32 and 64 bit do the same thing even if its
sometimes redundant.

    J

  reply	other threads:[~2009-08-21 22:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-08-21 21:29 [RFC patch 00/32] x86: Refactor the setup code to provide a base for embedded platforms Thomas Gleixner
2009-08-21 21:29 ` [RFC patch 01/32] x86: Add platform_setup infrastructure Thomas Gleixner
2009-08-21 21:29 ` [RFC patch 02/32] x86: Add probe_roms to platform_setup Thomas Gleixner
2009-08-21 22:23   ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge [this message]
2009-08-21 22:36     ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-08-28 21:52       ` [RFC PATCH 0/7] x86/boot: Moorestown patch set based on platform_set abstraction Pan, Jacob jun
2009-08-29 16:59         ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-08-28 21:52       ` [RFC PATCH 2/7] x86: introduce a set of platform feature flags Pan, Jacob jun
2009-08-28 21:52       ` [RFC PATCH 3/7] x86: add moorestown specific platform setup code Pan, Jacob jun
2009-08-29 17:20         ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-08-28 21:53       ` [RFC PATCH 4/7] x86/apbt: Moorestown APB system timer driver Pan, Jacob jun
2009-08-28 21:53       ` [RFC PATCH 5/7] x86/apic: decouple legacy irq handling in ioapic Pan, Jacob jun
2009-08-28 21:53       ` [RFC PATCH 6/7] x86/apic: Early setup IOAPIC for APB timer Pan, Jacob jun
2009-08-28 21:53       ` [RFC PATCH 7/7] x86: add more platform_setup functions Pan, Jacob jun
2009-08-29 17:31         ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-08-21 21:29 ` [RFC patch 03/32] x86: Add request_standard_resources to platform_setup Thomas Gleixner
2009-08-21 21:29 ` [RFC patch 04/32] x86: Add reserve_ebda_region " Thomas Gleixner
2009-08-21 21:29 ` [RFC patch 05/32] x86: Move memory_setup to platform Thomas Gleixner
2009-08-21 21:29 ` [RFC patch 06/32] x86: Sanitize smp_record and move it to platform_setup Thomas Gleixner
2009-08-21 21:30 ` [RFC patch 07/32] x86: Move ioapic_ids_setup " Thomas Gleixner
2009-08-21 21:30 ` [RFC patch 08/32] x86: Move mpc_apic_id " Thomas Gleixner
2009-08-21 21:30 ` [RFC patch 09/32] x86: Move smp_read_mpc_oem " Thomas Gleixner
2009-08-21 21:30 ` [RFC patch 10/32] x86: Move mpc_oem_pci_bus " Thomas Gleixner
2009-08-21 21:30 ` [RFC patch 11/32] x86: Move oem_bus_info " Thomas Gleixner
2009-08-21 21:30 ` [RFC patch 12/32] x86: Move get/find_smp_config " Thomas Gleixner
2009-08-21 21:30 ` [RFC patch 13/32] x86: Move pre_intr_init " Thomas Gleixner
2009-08-21 21:30 ` [RFC patch 14/32] x86: Move irq_init " Thomas Gleixner
2009-08-21 21:30 ` [RFC patch 15/32] x86: Move traps_init " Thomas Gleixner
2009-08-21 21:30 ` [RFC patch 16/32] x86: Replace ARCH_SETUP by a proper platform function Thomas Gleixner
2009-08-21 22:30   ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-08-21 23:42     ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-08-28 21:52       ` [PATCH 1/7] x86/boot: adding hw subarch ID for Moorestown Pan, Jacob jun
2009-08-29 16:58         ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-08-21 21:30 ` [RFC patch 17/32] x86: Move paravirt banner printout to platform Thomas Gleixner
2009-08-21 21:30 ` [RFC patch 18/32] x86: Move paravirt pagetable_setup " Thomas Gleixner
2009-08-21 21:31 ` [RFC patch 19/32] x86: Move xen_post_allocator_init into xen_pagetable_setup_done Thomas Gleixner
2009-08-21 21:31 ` [RFC patch 20/32] x86: Move percpu clockevents setup to platform Thomas Gleixner
2009-08-21 21:31 ` [RFC patch 21/32] x86: Add timer_init " Thomas Gleixner
2009-08-24  6:48   ` Andrey Panin
2009-08-21 21:31 ` [RFC patch 22/32] x86: Remove do_timer hook Thomas Gleixner
2009-08-21 21:31 ` [RFC patch 23/32] x86: Prepare unification of time_32/64.c Thomas Gleixner
2009-08-21 21:31 ` [RFC patch 24/32] x86: Simplify timer_ack magic in time_32.c Thomas Gleixner
2009-08-21 21:31 ` [RFC patch 25/32] x86: Remove mca bus ifdef from timer interrupt Thomas Gleixner
2009-08-21 21:31 ` [RFC patch 26/32] x86: Make timer setup and global variables the same in time_32/64.c Thomas Gleixner
2009-08-21 21:31 ` [RFC patch 27/32] x86: Move calibrate_cpu to tsc.c Thomas Gleixner
2009-08-21 21:32 ` [RFC patch 28/32] x86: time_32/64.c unify profile_pc Thomas Gleixner
2009-08-21 21:32 ` [RFC patch 29/32] x86: Replace the now identical time_32/64.c by time.c Thomas Gleixner
2009-08-21 21:32 ` [RFC patch 30/32] x86: Move tsc_calibration to platform Thomas Gleixner
2009-08-21 21:32 ` [RFC patch 31/32] init: Move sched_clock_init after late_time_init Thomas Gleixner
2009-08-21 21:32 ` [RFC patch 32/32] x86: Move tsc_init to late_time_init Thomas Gleixner
2009-08-21 22:19 ` [RFC patch 00/32] x86: Refactor the setup code to provide a base for embedded platforms Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-08-22 10:57 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-08-23  9:15   ` Thomas Gleixner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4A8F1E4D.9080409@goop.org \
    --to=jeremy@goop.org \
    --cc=akataria@vmware.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=arjan@infradead.org \
    --cc=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=jacob.jun.pan@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox