From: dino@in.ibm.com
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org,
John Stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>,
Darren Hart <dvhltc@us.ibm.com>, John Kacur <jkacur@redhat.com>
Subject: [patch -rt 01/17] sched: restore __cpu_power to a straight sum of power
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 18:07:44 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091022124109.712036201@spinlock.in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20091022123743.506956796@spinlock.in.ibm.com
[-- Attachment #1: sched-lb-1.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 2390 bytes --]
cpu_power is supposed to be a representation of the process capacity
of the cpu, not a value to randomly tweak in order to affect
placement.
Remove the placement hacks.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Signed-off-by: Dinakar Guniguntala <dino@in.ibm.com>
---
include/linux/sched.h | 1 +
include/linux/topology.h | 1 +
kernel/sched.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++----------------
3 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
Index: linux-2.6.31.4-rt14/kernel/sched.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.31.4-rt14.orig/kernel/sched.c 2009-10-16 08:56:17.000000000 -0400
+++ linux-2.6.31.4-rt14/kernel/sched.c 2009-10-16 09:15:18.000000000 -0400
@@ -8670,15 +8670,13 @@
* there are asymmetries in the topology. If there are asymmetries, group
* having more cpu_power will pickup more load compared to the group having
* less cpu_power.
- *
- * cpu_power will be a multiple of SCHED_LOAD_SCALE. This multiple represents
- * the maximum number of tasks a group can handle in the presence of other idle
- * or lightly loaded groups in the same sched domain.
*/
static void init_sched_groups_power(int cpu, struct sched_domain *sd)
{
struct sched_domain *child;
struct sched_group *group;
+ long power;
+ int weight;
WARN_ON(!sd || !sd->groups);
@@ -8689,22 +8687,20 @@
sd->groups->__cpu_power = 0;
- /*
- * For perf policy, if the groups in child domain share resources
- * (for example cores sharing some portions of the cache hierarchy
- * or SMT), then set this domain groups cpu_power such that each group
- * can handle only one task, when there are other idle groups in the
- * same sched domain.
- */
- if (!child || (!(sd->flags & SD_POWERSAVINGS_BALANCE) &&
- (child->flags &
- (SD_SHARE_CPUPOWER | SD_SHARE_PKG_RESOURCES)))) {
- sg_inc_cpu_power(sd->groups, SCHED_LOAD_SCALE);
+ if (!child) {
+ power = SCHED_LOAD_SCALE;
+ weight = cpumask_weight(sched_domain_span(sd));
+ /*
+ * SMT siblings share the power of a single core.
+ */
+ if ((sd->flags & SD_SHARE_CPUPOWER) && weight > 1)
+ power /= weight;
+ sg_inc_cpu_power(sd->groups, power);
return;
}
/*
- * add cpu_power of each child group to this groups cpu_power
+ * Add cpu_power of each child group to this groups cpu_power.
*/
group = child->groups;
do {
--
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-22 12:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-10-22 12:37 [patch -rt 00/17] [patch -rt] Sched load balance backport dino
2009-10-22 12:37 ` dino [this message]
2009-10-22 12:37 ` [patch -rt 02/17] sched: SD_PREFER_SIBLING dino
2009-10-22 12:37 ` [patch -rt 03/17] sched: update the cpu_power sum during load-balance dino
2009-10-22 12:37 ` [patch -rt 04/17] sched: add smt_gain dino
2009-10-22 12:37 ` [patch -rt 05/17] sched: dynamic cpu_power dino
2009-10-22 12:37 ` [patch -rt 06/17] sched: scale down cpu_power due to RT tasks dino
2009-10-22 12:37 ` [patch -rt 07/17] sched: try to deal with low capacity dino
2009-10-22 12:37 ` [patch -rt 08/17] sched: remove reciprocal for cpu_power dino
2009-10-22 12:37 ` [patch -rt 09/17] x86: move APERF/MPERF into a X86_FEATURE dino
2009-10-22 12:37 ` [patch -rt 10/17] x86: Add generic aperf/mperf code dino
2009-10-22 12:37 ` [patch -rt 11/17] Provide an arch specific hook for cpufreq based scaling of cpu_power dino
2009-10-22 12:37 ` [patch -rt 12/17] x86: sched: provide arch implementations using aperf/mperf dino
2009-10-22 12:37 ` [patch -rt 13/17] sched: cleanup wake_idle power saving dino
2009-10-22 12:37 ` [patch -rt 14/17] sched: cleanup wake_idle dino
2009-10-22 12:37 ` [patch -rt 15/17] sched: Add a missing = dino
2009-10-22 12:37 ` [patch -rt 16/17] sched: Deal with low-load in wake_affine() dino
2009-10-22 12:38 ` [patch -rt 17/17] sched: Fix dynamic power-balancing crash dino
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091022124109.712036201@spinlock.in.ibm.com \
--to=dino@in.ibm.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=dvhltc@us.ibm.com \
--cc=jkacur@redhat.com \
--cc=johnstul@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox