public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: dino@in.ibm.com
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org,
	John Stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>,
	Darren Hart <dvhltc@us.ibm.com>, John Kacur <jkacur@redhat.com>
Subject: [patch -rt 10/17] x86: Add generic aperf/mperf code
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 18:07:53 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091022124111.756583994@spinlock.in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20091022123743.506956796@spinlock.in.ibm.com

[-- Attachment #1: sched-lb-9-new.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 4532 bytes --]

    
Move some of the aperf/mperf code out from the cpufreq driver
thingy so that other people can enjoy it too.
    

Index: linux-2.6.31.4-rt14-lb1/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.31.4-rt14-lb1.orig/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h	2009-10-21 10:47:17.000000000 -0400
+++ linux-2.6.31.4-rt14-lb1/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h	2009-10-21 10:48:41.000000000 -0400
@@ -27,6 +27,7 @@
 #include <linux/cpumask.h>
 #include <linux/cache.h>
 #include <linux/threads.h>
+#include <linux/math64.h>
 #include <linux/init.h>
 
 /*
@@ -1010,4 +1011,33 @@
 extern int get_tsc_mode(unsigned long adr);
 extern int set_tsc_mode(unsigned int val);
 
+struct aperfmperf {
+	u64 aperf, mperf;
+};
+
+static inline void get_aperfmperf(struct aperfmperf *am)
+{
+	WARN_ON_ONCE(!boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_APERFMPERF));
+
+	rdmsrl(MSR_IA32_APERF, am->aperf);
+	rdmsrl(MSR_IA32_MPERF, am->mperf);
+}
+
+#define APERFMPERF_SHIFT 10
+
+static inline
+unsigned long calc_aperfmperf_ratio(struct aperfmperf *old,
+				    struct aperfmperf *new)
+{
+	u64 aperf = new->aperf - old->aperf;
+	u64 mperf = new->mperf - old->mperf;
+	unsigned long ratio = aperf;
+
+	mperf >>= APERFMPERF_SHIFT;
+	if (mperf)
+		ratio = div64_u64(aperf, mperf);
+
+	return ratio;
+}
+
 #endif /* _ASM_X86_PROCESSOR_H */
Index: linux-2.6.31.4-rt14-lb1/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.31.4-rt14-lb1.orig/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c	2009-10-21 10:47:17.000000000 -0400
+++ linux-2.6.31.4-rt14-lb1/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c	2009-10-21 10:48:41.000000000 -0400
@@ -70,11 +70,7 @@
 
 static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct acpi_cpufreq_data *, drv_data);
 
-struct acpi_msr_data {
-	u64 saved_aperf, saved_mperf;
-};
-
-static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct acpi_msr_data, msr_data);
+static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct aperfmperf, old_perf);
 
 DEFINE_TRACE(power_mark);
 
@@ -243,23 +239,12 @@
 	return cmd.val;
 }
 
-struct perf_pair {
-	union {
-		struct {
-			u32 lo;
-			u32 hi;
-		} split;
-		u64 whole;
-	} aperf, mperf;
-};
-
 /* Called via smp_call_function_single(), on the target CPU */
 static void read_measured_perf_ctrs(void *_cur)
 {
-	struct perf_pair *cur = _cur;
+	struct aperfmperf *am = _cur;
 
-	rdmsr(MSR_IA32_APERF, cur->aperf.split.lo, cur->aperf.split.hi);
-	rdmsr(MSR_IA32_MPERF, cur->mperf.split.lo, cur->mperf.split.hi);
+	get_aperfmperf(am);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -278,63 +263,17 @@
 static unsigned int get_measured_perf(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
 				      unsigned int cpu)
 {
-	struct perf_pair readin, cur;
-	unsigned int perf_percent;
+	struct aperfmperf perf;
+	unsigned long ratio;
 	unsigned int retval;
 
-	if (smp_call_function_single(cpu, read_measured_perf_ctrs, &readin, 1))
+	if (smp_call_function_single(cpu, read_measured_perf_ctrs, &perf, 1))
 		return 0;
 
-	cur.aperf.whole = readin.aperf.whole -
-				per_cpu(msr_data, cpu).saved_aperf;
-	cur.mperf.whole = readin.mperf.whole -
-				per_cpu(msr_data, cpu).saved_mperf;
-	per_cpu(msr_data, cpu).saved_aperf = readin.aperf.whole;
-	per_cpu(msr_data, cpu).saved_mperf = readin.mperf.whole;
-
-#ifdef __i386__
-	/*
-	 * We dont want to do 64 bit divide with 32 bit kernel
-	 * Get an approximate value. Return failure in case we cannot get
-	 * an approximate value.
-	 */
-	if (unlikely(cur.aperf.split.hi || cur.mperf.split.hi)) {
-		int shift_count;
-		u32 h;
-
-		h = max_t(u32, cur.aperf.split.hi, cur.mperf.split.hi);
-		shift_count = fls(h);
-
-		cur.aperf.whole >>= shift_count;
-		cur.mperf.whole >>= shift_count;
-	}
-
-	if (((unsigned long)(-1) / 100) < cur.aperf.split.lo) {
-		int shift_count = 7;
-		cur.aperf.split.lo >>= shift_count;
-		cur.mperf.split.lo >>= shift_count;
-	}
-
-	if (cur.aperf.split.lo && cur.mperf.split.lo)
-		perf_percent = (cur.aperf.split.lo * 100) / cur.mperf.split.lo;
-	else
-		perf_percent = 0;
-
-#else
-	if (unlikely(((unsigned long)(-1) / 100) < cur.aperf.whole)) {
-		int shift_count = 7;
-		cur.aperf.whole >>= shift_count;
-		cur.mperf.whole >>= shift_count;
-	}
-
-	if (cur.aperf.whole && cur.mperf.whole)
-		perf_percent = (cur.aperf.whole * 100) / cur.mperf.whole;
-	else
-		perf_percent = 0;
-
-#endif
+	ratio = calc_aperfmperf_ratio(&per_cpu(old_perf, cpu), &perf);
+	per_cpu(old_perf, cpu) = perf;
 
-	retval = (policy->cpuinfo.max_freq * perf_percent) / 100;
+	retval = (policy->cpuinfo.max_freq * ratio) >> APERFMPERF_SHIFT;
 
 	return retval;
 }

--

  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-10-22 12:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-10-22 12:37 [patch -rt 00/17] [patch -rt] Sched load balance backport dino
2009-10-22 12:37 ` [patch -rt 01/17] sched: restore __cpu_power to a straight sum of power dino
2009-10-22 12:37 ` [patch -rt 02/17] sched: SD_PREFER_SIBLING dino
2009-10-22 12:37 ` [patch -rt 03/17] sched: update the cpu_power sum during load-balance dino
2009-10-22 12:37 ` [patch -rt 04/17] sched: add smt_gain dino
2009-10-22 12:37 ` [patch -rt 05/17] sched: dynamic cpu_power dino
2009-10-22 12:37 ` [patch -rt 06/17] sched: scale down cpu_power due to RT tasks dino
2009-10-22 12:37 ` [patch -rt 07/17] sched: try to deal with low capacity dino
2009-10-22 12:37 ` [patch -rt 08/17] sched: remove reciprocal for cpu_power dino
2009-10-22 12:37 ` [patch -rt 09/17] x86: move APERF/MPERF into a X86_FEATURE dino
2009-10-22 12:37 ` dino [this message]
2009-10-22 12:37 ` [patch -rt 11/17] Provide an arch specific hook for cpufreq based scaling of cpu_power dino
2009-10-22 12:37 ` [patch -rt 12/17] x86: sched: provide arch implementations using aperf/mperf dino
2009-10-22 12:37 ` [patch -rt 13/17] sched: cleanup wake_idle power saving dino
2009-10-22 12:37 ` [patch -rt 14/17] sched: cleanup wake_idle dino
2009-10-22 12:37 ` [patch -rt 15/17] sched: Add a missing = dino
2009-10-22 12:37 ` [patch -rt 16/17] sched: Deal with low-load in wake_affine() dino
2009-10-22 12:38 ` [patch -rt 17/17] sched: Fix dynamic power-balancing crash dino

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20091022124111.756583994@spinlock.in.ibm.com \
    --to=dino@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=dvhltc@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=jkacur@redhat.com \
    --cc=johnstul@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox