From: dino@in.ibm.com
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org,
John Stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>,
Darren Hart <dvhltc@us.ibm.com>, John Kacur <jkacur@redhat.com>
Subject: [patch -rt 06/17] sched: scale down cpu_power due to RT tasks
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 18:07:49 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091022124110.783778598@spinlock.in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20091022123743.506956796@spinlock.in.ibm.com
[-- Attachment #1: sched-lb-5.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 5365 bytes --]
Keep an average on the amount of time spend on RT tasks and use that
fraction to scale down the cpu_power for regular tasks.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Signed-off-by: Dinakar Guniguntala <dino@in.ibm.com>
---
include/linux/sched.h | 1
kernel/sched.c | 64 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
kernel/sched_rt.c | 6 +---
kernel/sysctl.c | 8 ++++++
4 files changed, 72 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
Index: linux-2.6.31.4-rt14/include/linux/sched.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.31.4-rt14.orig/include/linux/sched.h 2009-10-16 09:15:34.000000000 -0400
+++ linux-2.6.31.4-rt14/include/linux/sched.h 2009-10-16 09:15:36.000000000 -0400
@@ -1915,6 +1915,7 @@
extern unsigned int sysctl_sched_features;
extern unsigned int sysctl_sched_migration_cost;
extern unsigned int sysctl_sched_nr_migrate;
+extern unsigned int sysctl_sched_time_avg;
extern unsigned int sysctl_timer_migration;
int sched_nr_latency_handler(struct ctl_table *table, int write,
Index: linux-2.6.31.4-rt14/kernel/sched.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.31.4-rt14.orig/kernel/sched.c 2009-10-16 09:15:35.000000000 -0400
+++ linux-2.6.31.4-rt14/kernel/sched.c 2009-10-16 09:15:36.000000000 -0400
@@ -673,6 +673,9 @@
struct task_struct *migration_thread;
struct list_head migration_queue;
+
+ u64 rt_avg;
+ u64 age_stamp;
#endif
/* calc_load related fields */
@@ -927,6 +930,14 @@
unsigned int sysctl_sched_shares_thresh = 4;
/*
+ * period over which we average the RT time consumption, measured
+ * in ms.
+ *
+ * default: 1s
+ */
+const_debug unsigned int sysctl_sched_time_avg = MSEC_PER_SEC;
+
+/*
* period over which we measure -rt task cpu usage in us.
* default: 1s
*/
@@ -1370,12 +1381,37 @@
}
#endif /* CONFIG_NO_HZ */
+static u64 sched_avg_period(void)
+{
+ return (u64)sysctl_sched_time_avg * NSEC_PER_MSEC / 2;
+}
+
+static void sched_avg_update(struct rq *rq)
+{
+ s64 period = sched_avg_period();
+
+ while ((s64)(rq->clock - rq->age_stamp) > period) {
+ rq->age_stamp += period;
+ rq->rt_avg /= 2;
+ }
+}
+
+static void sched_rt_avg_update(struct rq *rq, u64 rt_delta)
+{
+ rq->rt_avg += rt_delta;
+ sched_avg_update(rq);
+}
+
#else /* !CONFIG_SMP */
static void resched_task(struct task_struct *p)
{
assert_atomic_spin_locked(&task_rq(p)->lock);
set_tsk_need_resched(p);
}
+
+static void sched_rt_avg_update(struct rq *rq, u64 rt_delta)
+{
+}
#endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
#if BITS_PER_LONG == 32
@@ -3780,7 +3816,7 @@
}
#endif /* CONFIG_SCHED_MC || CONFIG_SCHED_SMT */
-unsigned long __weak arch_smt_gain(struct sched_domain *sd, int cpu)
+unsigned long __weak arch_scale_smt_power(struct sched_domain *sd, int cpu)
{
unsigned long weight = cpumask_weight(sched_domain_span(sd));
unsigned long smt_gain = sd->smt_gain;
@@ -3790,6 +3826,24 @@
return smt_gain;
}
+unsigned long scale_rt_power(int cpu)
+{
+ struct rq *rq = cpu_rq(cpu);
+ u64 total, available;
+
+ sched_avg_update(rq);
+
+ total = sched_avg_period() + (rq->clock - rq->age_stamp);
+ available = total - rq->rt_avg;
+
+ if (unlikely((s64)total < SCHED_LOAD_SCALE))
+ total = SCHED_LOAD_SCALE;
+
+ total >>= SCHED_LOAD_SHIFT;
+
+ return div_u64(available, total);
+}
+
static void update_cpu_power(struct sched_domain *sd, int cpu)
{
unsigned long weight = cpumask_weight(sched_domain_span(sd));
@@ -3800,11 +3854,15 @@
/* here we could scale based on cpufreq */
if ((sd->flags & SD_SHARE_CPUPOWER) && weight > 1) {
- power *= arch_smt_gain(sd, cpu);
+ power *= arch_scale_smt_power(sd, cpu);
power >>= SCHED_LOAD_SHIFT;
}
- /* here we could scale based on RT time */
+ power *= scale_rt_power(cpu);
+ power >>= SCHED_LOAD_SHIFT;
+
+ if (!power)
+ power = 1;
if (power != old) {
sdg->__cpu_power = power;
Index: linux-2.6.31.4-rt14/kernel/sched_rt.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.31.4-rt14.orig/kernel/sched_rt.c 2009-10-16 09:15:15.000000000 -0400
+++ linux-2.6.31.4-rt14/kernel/sched_rt.c 2009-10-16 09:15:36.000000000 -0400
@@ -602,6 +602,8 @@
curr->se.exec_start = rq->clock;
cpuacct_charge(curr, delta_exec);
+ sched_rt_avg_update(rq, delta_exec);
+
if (!rt_bandwidth_enabled())
return;
@@ -926,8 +928,6 @@
if (!task_current(rq, p) && p->rt.nr_cpus_allowed > 1)
enqueue_pushable_task(rq, p);
-
- inc_cpu_load(rq, p->se.load.weight);
}
static void dequeue_task_rt(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int sleep)
@@ -942,8 +942,6 @@
dequeue_rt_entity(rt_se);
dequeue_pushable_task(rq, p);
-
- dec_cpu_load(rq, p->se.load.weight);
}
/*
Index: linux-2.6.31.4-rt14/kernel/sysctl.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.31.4-rt14.orig/kernel/sysctl.c 2009-10-16 09:15:15.000000000 -0400
+++ linux-2.6.31.4-rt14/kernel/sysctl.c 2009-10-16 09:15:36.000000000 -0400
@@ -332,6 +332,14 @@
},
{
.ctl_name = CTL_UNNUMBERED,
+ .procname = "sched_time_avg",
+ .data = &sysctl_sched_time_avg,
+ .maxlen = sizeof(unsigned int),
+ .mode = 0644,
+ .proc_handler = &proc_dointvec,
+ },
+ {
+ .ctl_name = CTL_UNNUMBERED,
.procname = "timer_migration",
.data = &sysctl_timer_migration,
.maxlen = sizeof(unsigned int),
--
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-22 12:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-10-22 12:37 [patch -rt 00/17] [patch -rt] Sched load balance backport dino
2009-10-22 12:37 ` [patch -rt 01/17] sched: restore __cpu_power to a straight sum of power dino
2009-10-22 12:37 ` [patch -rt 02/17] sched: SD_PREFER_SIBLING dino
2009-10-22 12:37 ` [patch -rt 03/17] sched: update the cpu_power sum during load-balance dino
2009-10-22 12:37 ` [patch -rt 04/17] sched: add smt_gain dino
2009-10-22 12:37 ` [patch -rt 05/17] sched: dynamic cpu_power dino
2009-10-22 12:37 ` dino [this message]
2009-10-22 12:37 ` [patch -rt 07/17] sched: try to deal with low capacity dino
2009-10-22 12:37 ` [patch -rt 08/17] sched: remove reciprocal for cpu_power dino
2009-10-22 12:37 ` [patch -rt 09/17] x86: move APERF/MPERF into a X86_FEATURE dino
2009-10-22 12:37 ` [patch -rt 10/17] x86: Add generic aperf/mperf code dino
2009-10-22 12:37 ` [patch -rt 11/17] Provide an arch specific hook for cpufreq based scaling of cpu_power dino
2009-10-22 12:37 ` [patch -rt 12/17] x86: sched: provide arch implementations using aperf/mperf dino
2009-10-22 12:37 ` [patch -rt 13/17] sched: cleanup wake_idle power saving dino
2009-10-22 12:37 ` [patch -rt 14/17] sched: cleanup wake_idle dino
2009-10-22 12:37 ` [patch -rt 15/17] sched: Add a missing = dino
2009-10-22 12:37 ` [patch -rt 16/17] sched: Deal with low-load in wake_affine() dino
2009-10-22 12:38 ` [patch -rt 17/17] sched: Fix dynamic power-balancing crash dino
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091022124110.783778598@spinlock.in.ibm.com \
--to=dino@in.ibm.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=dvhltc@us.ibm.com \
--cc=jkacur@redhat.com \
--cc=johnstul@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox