* linux-next: arm tree build failure
@ 2010-01-28 23:38 Stephen Rothwell
2010-01-29 23:45 ` Russell King
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2010-01-28 23:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Russell King; +Cc: linux-next, linux-kernel
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 484 bytes --]
Hi Russell,
Yesterday's linux-next (next-20100128) build (arm versatile_defconfig)
failed like this:
arch/arm/mach-versatile/core.c: In function 'versatile_init':
arch/arm/mach-versatile/core.c:838: error: 'i' undeclared (first use in this function)
Looks like a bad merge (commit b7cdd38da36d61d0f42367057c9d04678644317a
"Merge branch 'versatile' into devel").
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: linux-next: arm tree build failure
2010-01-28 23:38 linux-next: arm tree build failure Stephen Rothwell
@ 2010-01-29 23:45 ` Russell King
2010-01-30 1:27 ` Stephen Rothwell
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Russell King @ 2010-01-29 23:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stephen Rothwell; +Cc: linux-next, linux-kernel
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 10:38:37AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Russell,
>
> Yesterday's linux-next (next-20100128) build (arm versatile_defconfig)
> failed like this:
>
> arch/arm/mach-versatile/core.c: In function 'versatile_init':
> arch/arm/mach-versatile/core.c:838: error: 'i' undeclared (first use in this function)
>
> Looks like a bad merge (commit b7cdd38da36d61d0f42367057c9d04678644317a
> "Merge branch 'versatile' into devel").
Thanks for catching that, now fixed.
--
Russell King
Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
maintainer of:
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* linux-next: arm tree build failure
@ 2009-09-10 4:59 Stephen Rothwell
2009-09-14 8:20 ` Russell King
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2009-09-10 4:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Russell King; +Cc: linux-next, linux-kernel, sedji gaouaou
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1260 bytes --]
Hi Russell,
The next-20090907 and later builds (arm at91cap9adk_defconfig) failed
like this:
arch/arm/mach-at91/at91cap9_devices.c:821: warning: 'struct atmel_ac97_data' declared inside parameter list
arch/arm/mach-at91/at91cap9_devices.c:821: warning: its scope is only this definition or declaration, which is probably not what you want
arch/arm/mach-at91/at91cap9_devices.c:821: error: conflicting types for 'at91_add_device_ac97'
arch/arm/mach-at91/include/mach/board.h:178: note: previous declaration of 'at91_add_device_ac97' was here
arch/arm/mach-at91/board-cap9adk.c:367: error: variable 'cap9adk_ac97_data' has initializer but incomplete type
arch/arm/mach-at91/board-cap9adk.c: In function 'cap9adk_board_init':
arch/arm/mach-at91/board-cap9adk.c:397: warning: passing argument 1 of 'at91_add_device_ac97' from incompatible pointer type
arch/arm/mach-at91/include/mach/board.h:178: note: expected 'struct ac97c_platform_data *' but argument is of type 'struct atmel_ac97_data *'
Caused by commit d656f07a7405e788e1275d0238b67f593615f2bb ("ARM: 5640/1:
This patch modifies the support of AC97 on the at91sam9263 ek board").
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* Re: linux-next: arm tree build failure
2009-09-10 4:59 Stephen Rothwell
@ 2009-09-14 8:20 ` Russell King
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Russell King @ 2009-09-14 8:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stephen Rothwell; +Cc: linux-next, linux-kernel, sedji gaouaou
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 02:59:44PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> The next-20090907 and later builds (arm at91cap9adk_defconfig) failed
> like this:
>
> arch/arm/mach-at91/at91cap9_devices.c:821: warning: 'struct atmel_ac97_data' declared inside parameter list
> arch/arm/mach-at91/at91cap9_devices.c:821: warning: its scope is only this definition or declaration, which is probably not what you want
> arch/arm/mach-at91/at91cap9_devices.c:821: error: conflicting types for 'at91_add_device_ac97'
> arch/arm/mach-at91/include/mach/board.h:178: note: previous declaration of 'at91_add_device_ac97' was here
> arch/arm/mach-at91/board-cap9adk.c:367: error: variable 'cap9adk_ac97_data' has initializer but incomplete type
> arch/arm/mach-at91/board-cap9adk.c: In function 'cap9adk_board_init':
> arch/arm/mach-at91/board-cap9adk.c:397: warning: passing argument 1 of 'at91_add_device_ac97' from incompatible pointer type
> arch/arm/mach-at91/include/mach/board.h:178: note: expected 'struct ac97c_platform_data *' but argument is of type 'struct atmel_ac97_data *'
>
> Caused by commit d656f07a7405e788e1275d0238b67f593615f2bb ("ARM: 5640/1:
> This patch modifies the support of AC97 on the at91sam9263 ek board").
No idea. I guess the Atmel folk have split one logical change up between
two trees, and its only been half merged. I don't see anything in the
patch description which mentions this though.
--
Russell King
Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
maintainer of:
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-01-30 1:27 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-01-28 23:38 linux-next: arm tree build failure Stephen Rothwell
2010-01-29 23:45 ` Russell King
2010-01-30 1:27 ` Stephen Rothwell
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-09-10 4:59 Stephen Rothwell
2009-09-14 8:20 ` Russell King
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox