* [PATCH 3/3] cpufreq: add sysfs knob for toggling core performance boost
@ 2010-03-03 20:59 Mark Langsdorf
2010-03-04 21:27 ` Andrew Morton
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Mark Langsdorf @ 2010-03-03 20:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel, cpufreq, bhavna.sarathy, joachim.deguara,
borislav.petkov
>From 1ba7af20a37b72a4375d3e3ddd33a033f204ee21 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mark Langsdorf <mark.langsdorf@amd.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2010 14:34:47 -0600
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] cpufreq: add sysfs knob for toggling core performance boost
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com>
Tested-by: Mark Langsdorf <mark.langsdorf@amd.com>
---
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
index 67bc2ec..e0fe93f 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
@@ -662,6 +662,30 @@ static ssize_t show_bios_limit(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, char *buf)
return sprintf(buf, "%u\n", policy->cpuinfo.max_freq);
}
+static ssize_t store_cpb(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, const char *buf,
+ size_t count)
+{
+ int ret = -EINVAL;
+ unsigned long val = 0;
+
+ ret = strict_strtoul(buf, 10, &val);
+ if (!ret && (val == 0 || val == 1))
+ policy->flags.cpb = val;
+ else
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ ret = __cpufreq_driver_target(policy, policy->cur, CPUFREQ_RELATION_H);
+ if (ret)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ return count;
+}
+
+static ssize_t show_cpb(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, char *buf)
+{
+ return sprintf(buf, "%u\n", policy->flags.cpb);
+}
+
#define define_one_ro(_name) \
static struct freq_attr _name = \
__ATTR(_name, 0444, show_##_name, NULL)
@@ -688,6 +712,7 @@ define_one_rw(scaling_min_freq);
define_one_rw(scaling_max_freq);
define_one_rw(scaling_governor);
define_one_rw(scaling_setspeed);
+define_one_rw(cpb);
static struct attribute *default_attrs[] = {
&cpuinfo_min_freq.attr,
@@ -701,6 +726,7 @@ static struct attribute *default_attrs[] = {
&scaling_driver.attr,
&scaling_available_governors.attr,
&scaling_setspeed.attr,
+ &cpb.attr,
NULL
};
--
1.6.0.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 3/3] cpufreq: add sysfs knob for toggling core performance boost
2010-03-03 20:59 [PATCH 3/3] cpufreq: add sysfs knob for toggling core performance boost Mark Langsdorf
@ 2010-03-04 21:27 ` Andrew Morton
2010-03-04 21:49 ` Borislav Petkov
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Morton @ 2010-03-04 21:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mark Langsdorf
Cc: linux-kernel, cpufreq, bhavna.sarathy, joachim.deguara,
borislav.petkov
On Wed, 3 Mar 2010 14:59:27 -0600
Mark Langsdorf <mark.langsdorf@amd.com> wrote:
> >From 1ba7af20a37b72a4375d3e3ddd33a033f204ee21 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Mark Langsdorf <mark.langsdorf@amd.com>
> Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2010 14:34:47 -0600
> Subject: [PATCH 2/2] cpufreq: add sysfs knob for toggling core performance boost
>
> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com>
> Tested-by: Mark Langsdorf <mark.langsdorf@amd.com>
The lack of any changelog in a patch is usually a good sign that the
patch needs a changelog :(
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> index 67bc2ec..e0fe93f 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> @@ -662,6 +662,30 @@ static ssize_t show_bios_limit(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, char *buf)
> return sprintf(buf, "%u\n", policy->cpuinfo.max_freq);
> }
>
> +static ssize_t store_cpb(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, const char *buf,
> + size_t count)
> +{
> + int ret = -EINVAL;
> + unsigned long val = 0;
> +
> + ret = strict_strtoul(buf, 10, &val);
> + if (!ret && (val == 0 || val == 1))
> + policy->flags.cpb = val;
> + else
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + ret = __cpufreq_driver_target(policy, policy->cur, CPUFREQ_RELATION_H);
> + if (ret)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + return count;
> +}
> +
> +static ssize_t show_cpb(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, char *buf)
> +{
> + return sprintf(buf, "%u\n", policy->flags.cpb);
> +}
> +
> #define define_one_ro(_name) \
> static struct freq_attr _name = \
> __ATTR(_name, 0444, show_##_name, NULL)
> @@ -688,6 +712,7 @@ define_one_rw(scaling_min_freq);
> define_one_rw(scaling_max_freq);
> define_one_rw(scaling_governor);
> define_one_rw(scaling_setspeed);
> +define_one_rw(cpb);
>
> static struct attribute *default_attrs[] = {
> &cpuinfo_min_freq.attr,
> @@ -701,6 +726,7 @@ static struct attribute *default_attrs[] = {
> &scaling_driver.attr,
> &scaling_available_governors.attr,
> &scaling_setspeed.attr,
> + &cpb.attr,
> NULL
> };
Well I've read the code and I've read the code comments and I've read
the changelogs and I still have no clue what this thing does.
Apparently it allows me to toggle something called "APERF/MPERF". I
guess if I were patient enough, teh goog might tell me what that is,
and why I might want it. But this is all terribly inefficient.
I think you'd find that your feature is more useful and will be used by
more people if you tell them (and us) what it does.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 3/3] cpufreq: add sysfs knob for toggling core performance boost
2010-03-04 21:27 ` Andrew Morton
@ 2010-03-04 21:49 ` Borislav Petkov
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Borislav Petkov @ 2010-03-04 21:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Morton
Cc: Mark Langsdorf, linux-kernel, cpufreq, bhavna.sarathy,
joachim.deguara
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu, Mar 04, 2010 at 01:27:43PM -0800
> The lack of any changelog in a patch is usually a good sign that the
> patch needs a changelog :(
See my earlier mail.
[..]
> Well I've read the code and I've read the code comments and I've read
> the changelogs and I still have no clue what this thing does.
> Apparently it allows me to toggle something called "APERF/MPERF". I
> guess if I were patient enough, teh goog might tell me what that is,
> and why I might want it. But this is all terribly inefficient.
>
> I think you'd find that your feature is more useful and will be used by
> more people if you tell them (and us) what it does.
Basically, this is a knob for toggling of a core boosting feature
we have in Fam10h, rev.E CPUs. I'll have a proper changelog with a
hopefully understandable explanation soon :).
Thanks.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
-
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
Operating Systems Research Center
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-03-04 21:49 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-03-03 20:59 [PATCH 3/3] cpufreq: add sysfs knob for toggling core performance boost Mark Langsdorf
2010-03-04 21:27 ` Andrew Morton
2010-03-04 21:49 ` Borislav Petkov
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox