public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	John Kacur <jkacur@redhat.com>,
	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] procfs: Kill the bkl in ioctl
Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2010 18:09:47 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100410160945.GF5204@nowhere> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201004011442.38536.arnd@arndb.de>

On Thu, Apr 01, 2010 at 02:42:38PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wednesday 31 March 2010, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 10:21:23PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > 
> > > In the meantime, we can move the declaration of the .locked_ioctl callback
> > > into an #ifdef CONFIG_BKL, to make sure nobody builds a driver with an
> > > ioctl function that does not get called.
> > 
> > 
> > Ok, now how to get this all merged? A single monolithic patch is probably
> > not appropriate.
> > 
> > The simplest is to have a single branch with the default_ioctl implemented,
> > and then attributed to drivers in a set cut by subsystems/drivers. And
> > push the whole for the next -rc1.
> > 
> > The other solution is to push default_ioctl for this release and get
> > the driver changes to each concerned tree. That said, I suspect a good
> > part of them are unmaintained, hence the other solution looks better
> > to me.
> 
> I don't care much about the unmaintained parts, we can always have a
> tree collecting all the patches for those drivers and merge it in -rc1.
> 
> I'd say the nicest way would be to get Linus to merge the patch
> below now, so we can start queuing stuff in maintainer trees on top
> of it, and check against linux-next what is still missing and push
> all of them from our branch.
> 
> 	Arnd
> 
> ---
> Subject: [PATCH] introduce CONFIG_BKL and default_ioctl
> 
> This is a preparation for the removal of the big kernel lock that
> introduces new interfaces for device drivers still using it.
> 
> We can start marking those device drivers as 'depends on CONFIG_BKL'
> now, and make that symbol optional later, when the point has come
> at which we are able to build a kernel without the BKL.
> 
> Similarly, device drivers that currently make use of the implicit
> BKL locking around the ioctl function can now get annotated by
> changing
> 
> 	.ioctl = foo_ioctl,
> 
> to
> 
> 	.locked_ioctl = foo_ioctl,
> 	.unlocked_ioctl = default_ioctl,
> 
> As soon as no driver remains using the old ioctl callback, it can
> get removed.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> ---
>  fs/ioctl.c               |   22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>  include/linux/fs.h       |    3 +++
>  include/linux/smp_lock.h |    4 ++++
>  lib/Kconfig.debug        |   10 ++++++++++
>  4 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/ioctl.c b/fs/ioctl.c
> index 6c75110..52c2698 100644
> --- a/fs/ioctl.c
> +++ b/fs/ioctl.c
> @@ -58,6 +58,28 @@ static long vfs_ioctl(struct file *filp, unsigned int cmd,
>  	return error;
>  }
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_BKL
> +/*
> + * default_ioctl - call unlocked_ioctl with BKL held
> + *
> + * Setting only the the ioctl operation but not unlocked_ioctl will become
> + * invalid in the future, all drivers that are not converted to unlocked_ioctl
> + * should set .unlocked_ioctl = default_ioctl now.
> + */
> +long default_ioctl(struct file *filp, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
> +{



Do you mind if I rename this to deprecated_ioctl()?
This "default" naming suggests a fallback everyone that don't
need tricky things should use.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-04-10 16:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-03-30  6:20 [PATCH 0/6] Kill the bkl in procfs Frederic Weisbecker
2010-03-30  6:20 ` [PATCH 1/6] procfs: Kill BKL in llseek on proc base Frederic Weisbecker
2010-03-30  6:40   ` Alexey Dobriyan
2010-03-30  6:50     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-03-30  6:20 ` [PATCH 2/6] procfs: Use generic_file_llseek in /proc/kcore Frederic Weisbecker
2010-03-30 10:28   ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-03-30  6:20 ` [PATCH 3/6] procfs: Use generic_file_llseek in /proc/kmsg Frederic Weisbecker
2010-03-30 10:38   ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-03-30  6:20 ` [PATCH 4/6] procfs: Use generic_file_llseek in /proc/vmcore Frederic Weisbecker
2010-03-30 10:38   ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-03-30  6:20 ` [PATCH 5/6] procfs: Push down the bkl from ioctl Frederic Weisbecker
2010-03-30  6:31   ` Alexey Dobriyan
2010-03-30  7:02     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-04-09 14:45     ` [PATCH v2] " Frederic Weisbecker
2010-04-10 13:25       ` [PATCH v3] " Frederic Weisbecker
2010-05-17  1:23         ` [PATCH v4] " Frederic Weisbecker
2010-03-30 10:37   ` [PATCH 5/6] " Arnd Bergmann
2010-03-30 18:27     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-03-30 18:54       ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-03-30 19:21         ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-03-30  6:20 ` [PATCH 6/6] procfs: Kill the bkl in ioctl Frederic Weisbecker
2010-03-30  6:38   ` Alexey Dobriyan
2010-03-30  7:07     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-03-30 10:33       ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-03-31 17:22         ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-03-31 20:21           ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-03-31 21:04             ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-03-31 21:55               ` Alan Cox
2010-04-01  9:07                 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-03-31 21:56               ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-04-01 11:37                 ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-04-01 10:22               ` John Kacur
2010-03-31 21:41             ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-04-01 12:42               ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-04-03 17:53                 ` Stefan Richter
2010-04-10 16:09                 ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2010-04-12 15:05                   ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-04-10 16:14                 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-04-10 16:24                 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-04-01 11:39           ` Stefan Richter
2010-04-01 12:45             ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-04-10 15:28               ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-04-11 13:03                 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-04-12 17:34                   ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-04-12 21:53                     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-04-13  9:26                       ` Arnd Bergmann
2010-04-13 20:10                         ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-04-13 18:03                     ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-04-10 13:27 ` [PATCH 0/6] Kill the bkl in procfs Frederic Weisbecker

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100410160945.GF5204@nowhere \
    --to=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=adobriyan@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=jkacur@redhat.com \
    --cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox