* Re: [PATCH resend 0/2] I2C: sis630: add sis964 support
[not found] <1346204115-30293-1-git-send-email-amaury.decreme@gmail.com>
@ 2012-12-18 11:51 ` Jean Delvare
2012-12-28 19:24 ` Amaury Decrême
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jean Delvare @ 2012-12-18 11:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Amaury Decrême
Cc: Wolfram Sang, nelson, mhoffman, amalysh, linux-i2c, linux-kernel
Hi Amaury,
On Wed, 29 Aug 2012 03:35:13 +0200, Amaury Decrême wrote:
> This serie of patches brings SIS964 support to i2c-sis630.
>
> The SiS datasheets have been used.
>
> The SIS964 isn't part of the SIS96X family and behaves differently.
> For i2c, this array show the differences between sis630 and sis964.
> +------------------------+--------------------+-------------------+
> | | SIS630/730 | SIS964 |
> +------------------------+--------------------+-------------------+
> | Clock | 14kHz/56kHz | 55.56kHz/27.78kHz |
> | SMBus registers offset | 0x80 | 0xE0 |
> | SMB_CNT | Bit 1 = Slave Busy | Bit 1 = Bus probe |
> | SMB_COUNT | 4:0 bits | 5:0 bits |
> +------------------------+--------------------+-------------------+
>
> The other differences doesn't affect the functions provided by the original
> i2c-sis630 driver.
>
> The first patch is mandatory as it adds supports for SIS964 bus.
> The second patch is optional. It depends on the first patch.
>
> Amaury Decrême (2):
> I2C: sis630: sis964 bus
> I2C: sis630: Cleaning and cosmetics
>
> Documentation/i2c/busses/i2c-sis630 | 17 +-
> drivers/i2c/busses/Kconfig | 4 +-
> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-sis630.c | 445 +++++++++++++++++++++--------------
> 3 files changed, 278 insertions(+), 188 deletions(-)
I reviewed these two patches 2 months ago, but did not hear back from
you since then. Do you plan to resubmit these patches with the
improvements I suggested? I would hate to see your work time and mine
wasted.
Thanks,
--
Jean Delvare
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH resend 0/2] I2C: sis630: add sis964 support
2012-12-18 11:51 ` [PATCH resend 0/2] I2C: sis630: add sis964 support Jean Delvare
@ 2012-12-28 19:24 ` Amaury Decrême
2013-01-04 9:39 ` Jean Delvare
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Amaury Decrême @ 2012-12-28 19:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jean Delvare
Cc: Wolfram Sang, nelson, mhoffman, amalysh, linux-i2c, linux-kernel
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 12:51:05PM +0100, Jean Delvare wrote:
> Hi Amaury,
>
> On Wed, 29 Aug 2012 03:35:13 +0200, Amaury Decrême wrote:
>
> I reviewed these two patches 2 months ago, but did not hear back from
> you since then. Do you plan to resubmit these patches with the
> improvements I suggested? I would hate to see your work time and mine
> wasted.
>
> Thanks,
> --
> Jean Delvare
Hi Jean,
I'm sorry I gave no news. I read your improvments with interests
when you sent it.
I changed my job at the very same moment and didn't have a minute
until xmas season..
It's getting a bit better and I hope to send a working solution
in early 2013 if the schedule is still ok.
Best regards, season greetings.
--
Amaury Decrême
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH resend 0/2] I2C: sis630: add sis964 support
2012-12-28 19:24 ` Amaury Decrême
@ 2013-01-04 9:39 ` Jean Delvare
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jean Delvare @ 2013-01-04 9:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Amaury Decrême
Cc: Wolfram Sang, nelson, mhoffman, amalysh, linux-i2c, linux-kernel
On Fri, 28 Dec 2012 20:24:00 +0100, Amaury Decrême wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 12:51:05PM +0100, Jean Delvare wrote:
> > On Wed, 29 Aug 2012 03:35:13 +0200, Amaury Decrême wrote:
> >
> > I reviewed these two patches 2 months ago, but did not hear back from
> > you since then. Do you plan to resubmit these patches with the
> > improvements I suggested? I would hate to see your work time and mine
> > wasted.
>
> I'm sorry I gave no news. I read your improvments with interests
> when you sent it.
>
> I changed my job at the very same moment and didn't have a minute
> until xmas season..
> It's getting a bit better and I hope to send a working solution
> in early 2013 if the schedule is still ok.
Yes, that would be OK.
Thanks,
--
Jean Delvare
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-01-04 9:39 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <1346204115-30293-1-git-send-email-amaury.decreme@gmail.com>
2012-12-18 11:51 ` [PATCH resend 0/2] I2C: sis630: add sis964 support Jean Delvare
2012-12-28 19:24 ` Amaury Decrême
2013-01-04 9:39 ` Jean Delvare
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox