* Re: [PATCH resend 0/2] I2C: sis630: add sis964 support [not found] <1346204115-30293-1-git-send-email-amaury.decreme@gmail.com> @ 2012-12-18 11:51 ` Jean Delvare 2012-12-28 19:24 ` Amaury Decrême 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Jean Delvare @ 2012-12-18 11:51 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Amaury Decrême Cc: Wolfram Sang, nelson, mhoffman, amalysh, linux-i2c, linux-kernel Hi Amaury, On Wed, 29 Aug 2012 03:35:13 +0200, Amaury Decrême wrote: > This serie of patches brings SIS964 support to i2c-sis630. > > The SiS datasheets have been used. > > The SIS964 isn't part of the SIS96X family and behaves differently. > For i2c, this array show the differences between sis630 and sis964. > +------------------------+--------------------+-------------------+ > | | SIS630/730 | SIS964 | > +------------------------+--------------------+-------------------+ > | Clock | 14kHz/56kHz | 55.56kHz/27.78kHz | > | SMBus registers offset | 0x80 | 0xE0 | > | SMB_CNT | Bit 1 = Slave Busy | Bit 1 = Bus probe | > | SMB_COUNT | 4:0 bits | 5:0 bits | > +------------------------+--------------------+-------------------+ > > The other differences doesn't affect the functions provided by the original > i2c-sis630 driver. > > The first patch is mandatory as it adds supports for SIS964 bus. > The second patch is optional. It depends on the first patch. > > Amaury Decrême (2): > I2C: sis630: sis964 bus > I2C: sis630: Cleaning and cosmetics > > Documentation/i2c/busses/i2c-sis630 | 17 +- > drivers/i2c/busses/Kconfig | 4 +- > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-sis630.c | 445 +++++++++++++++++++++-------------- > 3 files changed, 278 insertions(+), 188 deletions(-) I reviewed these two patches 2 months ago, but did not hear back from you since then. Do you plan to resubmit these patches with the improvements I suggested? I would hate to see your work time and mine wasted. Thanks, -- Jean Delvare ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH resend 0/2] I2C: sis630: add sis964 support 2012-12-18 11:51 ` [PATCH resend 0/2] I2C: sis630: add sis964 support Jean Delvare @ 2012-12-28 19:24 ` Amaury Decrême 2013-01-04 9:39 ` Jean Delvare 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Amaury Decrême @ 2012-12-28 19:24 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jean Delvare Cc: Wolfram Sang, nelson, mhoffman, amalysh, linux-i2c, linux-kernel On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 12:51:05PM +0100, Jean Delvare wrote: > Hi Amaury, > > On Wed, 29 Aug 2012 03:35:13 +0200, Amaury Decrême wrote: > > I reviewed these two patches 2 months ago, but did not hear back from > you since then. Do you plan to resubmit these patches with the > improvements I suggested? I would hate to see your work time and mine > wasted. > > Thanks, > -- > Jean Delvare Hi Jean, I'm sorry I gave no news. I read your improvments with interests when you sent it. I changed my job at the very same moment and didn't have a minute until xmas season.. It's getting a bit better and I hope to send a working solution in early 2013 if the schedule is still ok. Best regards, season greetings. -- Amaury Decrême ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH resend 0/2] I2C: sis630: add sis964 support 2012-12-28 19:24 ` Amaury Decrême @ 2013-01-04 9:39 ` Jean Delvare 0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: Jean Delvare @ 2013-01-04 9:39 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Amaury Decrême Cc: Wolfram Sang, nelson, mhoffman, amalysh, linux-i2c, linux-kernel On Fri, 28 Dec 2012 20:24:00 +0100, Amaury Decrême wrote: > On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 12:51:05PM +0100, Jean Delvare wrote: > > On Wed, 29 Aug 2012 03:35:13 +0200, Amaury Decrême wrote: > > > > I reviewed these two patches 2 months ago, but did not hear back from > > you since then. Do you plan to resubmit these patches with the > > improvements I suggested? I would hate to see your work time and mine > > wasted. > > I'm sorry I gave no news. I read your improvments with interests > when you sent it. > > I changed my job at the very same moment and didn't have a minute > until xmas season.. > It's getting a bit better and I hope to send a working solution > in early 2013 if the schedule is still ok. Yes, that would be OK. Thanks, -- Jean Delvare ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-01-04 9:39 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <1346204115-30293-1-git-send-email-amaury.decreme@gmail.com>
2012-12-18 11:51 ` [PATCH resend 0/2] I2C: sis630: add sis964 support Jean Delvare
2012-12-28 19:24 ` Amaury Decrême
2013-01-04 9:39 ` Jean Delvare
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox