* [PATCH 0/2] mfd: 88pm8xx: platform data bug fix @ 2013-08-19 1:27 Chao Xie 2013-08-19 1:27 ` [PATCH 1/2] mfd: 88pm800: Fix the bug that pdata may be NULL Chao Xie 2013-08-19 1:27 ` [PATCH 2/2] mfd: 88pm805: " Chao Xie 0 siblings, 2 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Chao Xie @ 2013-08-19 1:27 UTC (permalink / raw) To: sameo, lee.jones, linux-kernel, xiechao.mail; +Cc: Chao Xie The patches fix the bug that pdata may be NULL when driver uses it. Chao Xie (2): mfd: 88pm800: Fix the bug that pdata may be NULL mfd: 88pm805: Fix the bug that pdata may be NULL drivers/mfd/88pm800.c | 10 ++++++---- drivers/mfd/88pm805.c | 2 +- 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) -- 1.7.4.1 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 1/2] mfd: 88pm800: Fix the bug that pdata may be NULL 2013-08-19 1:27 [PATCH 0/2] mfd: 88pm8xx: platform data bug fix Chao Xie @ 2013-08-19 1:27 ` Chao Xie 2013-08-20 1:40 ` Samuel Ortiz 2013-08-19 1:27 ` [PATCH 2/2] mfd: 88pm805: " Chao Xie 1 sibling, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Chao Xie @ 2013-08-19 1:27 UTC (permalink / raw) To: sameo, lee.jones, linux-kernel, xiechao.mail; +Cc: Chao Xie User pass platform data to device, and platform data may be NULL. Add the check for pdata. Signed-off-by: Chao Xie <chao.xie@marvell.com> --- drivers/mfd/88pm800.c | 10 ++++++---- 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/mfd/88pm800.c b/drivers/mfd/88pm800.c index 6c95483..d4d272f 100644 --- a/drivers/mfd/88pm800.c +++ b/drivers/mfd/88pm800.c @@ -333,9 +333,11 @@ static int device_rtc_init(struct pm80x_chip *chip, { int ret; - rtc_devs[0].platform_data = pdata->rtc; - rtc_devs[0].pdata_size = - pdata->rtc ? sizeof(struct pm80x_rtc_pdata) : 0; + if (pdata) { + rtc_devs[0].platform_data = pdata->rtc; + rtc_devs[0].pdata_size = + pdata->rtc ? sizeof(struct pm80x_rtc_pdata) : 0; + } ret = mfd_add_devices(chip->dev, 0, &rtc_devs[0], ARRAY_SIZE(rtc_devs), NULL, 0, NULL); if (ret) { @@ -578,7 +580,7 @@ static int pm800_probe(struct i2c_client *client, goto err_device_init; } - if (pdata->plat_config) + if (pdata && pdata->plat_config) pdata->plat_config(chip, pdata); return 0; -- 1.7.4.1 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/2] mfd: 88pm800: Fix the bug that pdata may be NULL 2013-08-19 1:27 ` [PATCH 1/2] mfd: 88pm800: Fix the bug that pdata may be NULL Chao Xie @ 2013-08-20 1:40 ` Samuel Ortiz 2013-08-27 6:11 ` Chao Xie 0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Samuel Ortiz @ 2013-08-20 1:40 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Chao Xie; +Cc: lee.jones, linux-kernel, xiechao.mail Hi Xie, On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 09:27:54PM -0400, Chao Xie wrote: > User pass platform data to device, and platform data may be > NULL. In which case do you get that ? With DT ? Should rtc_init fail when pdata is NULL ? You need to explain that, be it only for us to know if it's a critical fix or not. Cheers, Samuel. -- Intel Open Source Technology Centre http://oss.intel.com/ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/2] mfd: 88pm800: Fix the bug that pdata may be NULL 2013-08-20 1:40 ` Samuel Ortiz @ 2013-08-27 6:11 ` Chao Xie 2013-08-30 12:30 ` Samuel Ortiz 0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Chao Xie @ 2013-08-27 6:11 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Samuel Ortiz; +Cc: Chao Xie, Lee Jones, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 9:40 AM, Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com> wrote: > Hi Xie, > > On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 09:27:54PM -0400, Chao Xie wrote: >> User pass platform data to device, and platform data may be >> NULL. > In which case do you get that ? With DT ? > Should rtc_init fail when pdata is NULL ? > > You need to explain that, be it only for us to know if it's a critical > fix or not. > Sorry for late response. If pdata is NULL, the driver will fail. So the error check should be done at the beginning of probe. If (!pdata) return -EINVAL; Is that OK? > Cheers, > Samuel. > > -- > Intel Open Source Technology Centre > http://oss.intel.com/ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/2] mfd: 88pm800: Fix the bug that pdata may be NULL 2013-08-27 6:11 ` Chao Xie @ 2013-08-30 12:30 ` Samuel Ortiz 2013-09-02 1:21 ` Chao Xie 0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Samuel Ortiz @ 2013-08-30 12:30 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Chao Xie; +Cc: Chao Xie, Lee Jones, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Xie, On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 02:11:58PM +0800, Chao Xie wrote: > On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 9:40 AM, Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com> wrote: > > Hi Xie, > > > > On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 09:27:54PM -0400, Chao Xie wrote: > >> User pass platform data to device, and platform data may be > >> NULL. > > In which case do you get that ? With DT ? > > Should rtc_init fail when pdata is NULL ? > > > > You need to explain that, be it only for us to know if it's a critical > > fix or not. > > > Sorry for late response. > If pdata is NULL, the driver will fail. The question is: Why would pdata be NULL ? If there's a fundamental issue you're hiding with this patch, you probably want to fix the real problem instead. Cheers, Samuel. -- Intel Open Source Technology Centre http://oss.intel.com/ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/2] mfd: 88pm800: Fix the bug that pdata may be NULL 2013-08-30 12:30 ` Samuel Ortiz @ 2013-09-02 1:21 ` Chao Xie 2013-09-02 8:50 ` Samuel Ortiz 0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Chao Xie @ 2013-09-02 1:21 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Samuel Ortiz; +Cc: Chao Xie, Lee Jones, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 8:30 PM, Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com> wrote: > Hi Xie, > > On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 02:11:58PM +0800, Chao Xie wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 9:40 AM, Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com> wrote: >> > Hi Xie, >> > >> > On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 09:27:54PM -0400, Chao Xie wrote: >> >> User pass platform data to device, and platform data may be >> >> NULL. >> > In which case do you get that ? With DT ? >> > Should rtc_init fail when pdata is NULL ? >> > >> > You need to explain that, be it only for us to know if it's a critical >> > fix or not. >> > >> Sorry for late response. >> If pdata is NULL, the driver will fail. > The question is: Why would pdata be NULL ? If there's a fundamental > issue you're hiding with this patch, you probably want to fix the real > problem instead. > Maybe i do not explain it clearly. The error is detected y some software checking tool. Pdata is passed from dev->platform_data. If the user pass the dev->platform_data to be NULL, at least mfd device driver need detect it, and reject it if it is not accpetable like return -EINVAL. Then the following probing code will not cause kernel panic if we access pdata->xxx. > Cheers, > Samuel. > > -- > Intel Open Source Technology Centre > http://oss.intel.com/ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/2] mfd: 88pm800: Fix the bug that pdata may be NULL 2013-09-02 1:21 ` Chao Xie @ 2013-09-02 8:50 ` Samuel Ortiz 0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Samuel Ortiz @ 2013-09-02 8:50 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Chao Xie; +Cc: Chao Xie, Lee Jones, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Chao, On Mon, Sep 02, 2013 at 09:21:04AM +0800, Chao Xie wrote: > On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 8:30 PM, Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com> wrote: > > Hi Xie, > > > > On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 02:11:58PM +0800, Chao Xie wrote: > >> On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 9:40 AM, Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com> wrote: > >> > Hi Xie, > >> > > >> > On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 09:27:54PM -0400, Chao Xie wrote: > >> >> User pass platform data to device, and platform data may be > >> >> NULL. > >> > In which case do you get that ? With DT ? > >> > Should rtc_init fail when pdata is NULL ? > >> > > >> > You need to explain that, be it only for us to know if it's a critical > >> > fix or not. > >> > > >> Sorry for late response. > >> If pdata is NULL, the driver will fail. > > The question is: Why would pdata be NULL ? If there's a fundamental > > issue you're hiding with this patch, you probably want to fix the real > > problem instead. > > > Maybe i do not explain it clearly. > The error is detected y some software checking tool. Ok, that's clearer. So it's not an actual bug you saw in practice, I'll modify the changelog accordingly. Cheers, Samuel. -- Intel Open Source Technology Centre http://oss.intel.com/ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 2/2] mfd: 88pm805: Fix the bug that pdata may be NULL 2013-08-19 1:27 [PATCH 0/2] mfd: 88pm8xx: platform data bug fix Chao Xie 2013-08-19 1:27 ` [PATCH 1/2] mfd: 88pm800: Fix the bug that pdata may be NULL Chao Xie @ 2013-08-19 1:27 ` Chao Xie 1 sibling, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Chao Xie @ 2013-08-19 1:27 UTC (permalink / raw) To: sameo, lee.jones, linux-kernel, xiechao.mail; +Cc: Chao Xie User pass platform data to device, and platform data may be NULL. Add the check for pdata. Signed-off-by: Chao Xie <chao.xie@marvell.com> --- drivers/mfd/88pm805.c | 2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/mfd/88pm805.c b/drivers/mfd/88pm805.c index 5216022..57135bb 100644 --- a/drivers/mfd/88pm805.c +++ b/drivers/mfd/88pm805.c @@ -243,7 +243,7 @@ static int pm805_probe(struct i2c_client *client, goto err_805_init; } - if (pdata->plat_config) + if (pdata && pdata->plat_config) pdata->plat_config(chip, pdata); err_805_init: -- 1.7.4.1 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-09-02 8:50 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2013-08-19 1:27 [PATCH 0/2] mfd: 88pm8xx: platform data bug fix Chao Xie 2013-08-19 1:27 ` [PATCH 1/2] mfd: 88pm800: Fix the bug that pdata may be NULL Chao Xie 2013-08-20 1:40 ` Samuel Ortiz 2013-08-27 6:11 ` Chao Xie 2013-08-30 12:30 ` Samuel Ortiz 2013-09-02 1:21 ` Chao Xie 2013-09-02 8:50 ` Samuel Ortiz 2013-08-19 1:27 ` [PATCH 2/2] mfd: 88pm805: " Chao Xie
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox