public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Cc: xiaoming.wang@intel.com,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] proc: move the adding option Ngid to the end of proc/PID/status
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2015 11:50:59 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150424155059.GE24029@htj.duckdns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150423203226.GA1765@p183.telecom.by>

On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 11:32:26PM +0300, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> There are 2 fields before Ngid and 35+ after Ngid. So the risk is not
> the same. Potentionally, Ngid addition broke almost every parser.

I don't get how we reach completely different conclusions from the
same observation.  This patch changes the offset for the 35+ fields
after Ngid in the current kernel instead of 4 something fields.  How
is that better?

-- 
tejun

  reply	other threads:[~2015-04-24 15:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-04-17 13:23 [PATCH] proc: move the adding option Ngid to the end of proc/PID/status Alexey Dobriyan
2015-04-17 14:26 ` Tejun Heo
2015-04-17 15:05   ` Alexey Dobriyan
2015-04-17 15:12     ` Tejun Heo
2015-04-21  8:19       ` Wang, Xiaoming
2015-04-21 14:00       ` Alexey Dobriyan
2015-04-21 15:11         ` Tejun Heo
2015-04-23 20:32           ` Alexey Dobriyan
2015-04-24 15:50             ` Tejun Heo [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-04-17  2:13 Wang Xiaoming
2015-04-17  2:56 ` Tejun Heo
2015-04-17  3:15   ` Wang, Xiaoming
2015-04-17  3:26     ` Tejun Heo
2015-04-17  3:37       ` Wang, Xiaoming
2015-04-17  3:42         ` Tejun Heo
2015-04-17  5:36           ` Wang, Xiaoming
2015-04-21 15:19             ` Eric W. Biederman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150424155059.GE24029@htj.duckdns.org \
    --to=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=adobriyan@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=xiaoming.wang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox