From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/7 V2] workqueue: introduce get_pwq_unlocked()
Date: Mon, 18 May 2015 16:28:03 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150518202803.GD24861@htj.duckdns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1431433955-3173-4-git-send-email-laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
Hello, Lai.
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 08:32:31PM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> attrs management code may reuse existed pwq and it has open code
existing
> to do "lock();get_pwq();unlock()", we move this open code into
> get_pwq_unlocked().
>
> get_pwq_unlocked() will also be used in later patches to allow
> apply_wqattrs_prepare() to resue the original default or per-node pwq.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
...
> +install:
> /* Install the new pwq. */
> mutex_lock(&wq->mutex);
> old_pwq = numa_pwq_tbl_install(wq, node, pwq);
> - goto out_unlock;
> -
> -use_dfl_pwq:
> - mutex_lock(&wq->mutex);
> - spin_lock_irq(&wq->dfl_pwq->pool->lock);
> - get_pwq(wq->dfl_pwq);
> - spin_unlock_irq(&wq->dfl_pwq->pool->lock);
> - old_pwq = numa_pwq_tbl_install(wq, node, wq->dfl_pwq);
> -out_unlock:
> mutex_unlock(&wq->mutex);
> put_pwq_unlocked(old_pwq);
> }
This doens't strike me as better. If we have other places where the
unlocked get is used, maybe, but that's not the case.
Thanks.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-18 20:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-12 12:32 [PATCH 0/7 V2] workqueue: cleanup for attr management Lai Jiangshan
2015-05-12 12:32 ` [PATCH 1/7 V2] workqueue: wq_pool_mutex protects the attrs-installation Lai Jiangshan
2015-05-12 12:32 ` [PATCH 2/7 V2] workqueue: simplify wq_update_unbound_numa() Lai Jiangshan
2015-05-18 20:21 ` Tejun Heo
2015-05-12 12:32 ` [PATCH 3/7 V2] workqueue: introduce get_pwq_unlocked() Lai Jiangshan
2015-05-18 20:28 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2015-05-18 20:41 ` Tejun Heo
2015-05-12 12:32 ` [PATCH 4/7 V2] workqueue: reuse the current per-node pwq when its attrs unchanged Lai Jiangshan
2015-05-18 20:34 ` Tejun Heo
2015-05-25 9:47 ` Lai Jiangshan
2015-05-26 18:51 ` Tejun Heo
2015-05-12 12:32 ` [PATCH 5/7 V2] workqueue: reuse the current default " Lai Jiangshan
2015-05-18 20:38 ` Tejun Heo
2015-05-12 12:32 ` [PATCH 6/7 V2] workqueue: reuse wq_update_unbound_numa_attrs_buf as temporary attrs Lai Jiangshan
2015-05-12 12:32 ` [PATCH 7/7 V2] workqueue: add get_node_unbound_pwq() Lai Jiangshan
2015-05-18 0:39 ` [PATCH 0/7 V2] workqueue: cleanup for attr management Lai Jiangshan
2015-05-18 1:26 ` Tejun Heo
2015-05-18 2:06 ` Lai Jiangshan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150518202803.GD24861@htj.duckdns.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox