From: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7 V2] workqueue: cleanup for attr management
Date: Mon, 18 May 2015 10:06:53 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5559493D.2050002@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150518012602.GB22064@htj.duckdns.org>
On 05/18/2015 09:26 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 08:39:21AM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
>> ping
>
> Does this reflect the comments from the previous review cycle?
>
This is the V2 version of the V1 pathset. But it is just the updated
version of the patch1&2 of the V1 patchset.
It doesn't contains the fix-up patch for wq_[nice|cpumask|numa]_store(),
so I can say it reflects all the comments except the name of the function
"get_node_unbound_pwq()" (patch was sent earlier than your replied).
(I wish I can get more comments before the next version).
The fix-up patch for wq_[nice|cpumask|numa]_store() is so important,
should I directly send a patchset for it (including the patch1&2 of this V2 patchset)?
(and delay or even drop the "get_alloc_node_unbound_pwq()").
Thanks,
Lai.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-18 2:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-12 12:32 [PATCH 0/7 V2] workqueue: cleanup for attr management Lai Jiangshan
2015-05-12 12:32 ` [PATCH 1/7 V2] workqueue: wq_pool_mutex protects the attrs-installation Lai Jiangshan
2015-05-12 12:32 ` [PATCH 2/7 V2] workqueue: simplify wq_update_unbound_numa() Lai Jiangshan
2015-05-18 20:21 ` Tejun Heo
2015-05-12 12:32 ` [PATCH 3/7 V2] workqueue: introduce get_pwq_unlocked() Lai Jiangshan
2015-05-18 20:28 ` Tejun Heo
2015-05-18 20:41 ` Tejun Heo
2015-05-12 12:32 ` [PATCH 4/7 V2] workqueue: reuse the current per-node pwq when its attrs unchanged Lai Jiangshan
2015-05-18 20:34 ` Tejun Heo
2015-05-25 9:47 ` Lai Jiangshan
2015-05-26 18:51 ` Tejun Heo
2015-05-12 12:32 ` [PATCH 5/7 V2] workqueue: reuse the current default " Lai Jiangshan
2015-05-18 20:38 ` Tejun Heo
2015-05-12 12:32 ` [PATCH 6/7 V2] workqueue: reuse wq_update_unbound_numa_attrs_buf as temporary attrs Lai Jiangshan
2015-05-12 12:32 ` [PATCH 7/7 V2] workqueue: add get_node_unbound_pwq() Lai Jiangshan
2015-05-18 0:39 ` [PATCH 0/7 V2] workqueue: cleanup for attr management Lai Jiangshan
2015-05-18 1:26 ` Tejun Heo
2015-05-18 2:06 ` Lai Jiangshan [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5559493D.2050002@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox