From: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7 V2] workqueue: cleanup for attr management
Date: Mon, 18 May 2015 08:39:21 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <555934B9.7030907@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1431433955-3173-1-git-send-email-laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
ping
On 05/12/2015 08:32 PM, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is the V2 version of the V1 pathset. But it is just the updated
> version of the patch1&2 of the V1 patchset.
>
> [1/5 V1] is split into [1/7 V2] and [2/7 V2].
> [2/5 V1] is split into [3,4,5,6,7/7 V2].
>
> [1/7] extends the wq_pool_mutex lock region in the apply_workqueue_attrs().
> It is a basic patch for all the later patches except the [6/7 V2].
> [2/7] simplifies wq_update_unbound_numa() since lock requirement is eased.
>
> [3/7] introduces get_pwq_unlocked() for reusing existing pwqs
> It is also a basic patch for all the later patches except the [6/7 V2].
> [4,5,6/7] apply the good code of wq_update_unbound_numa() to
> apply_workqueue_attrs(): reuse the unchanged per-node/default pwq
> and reuse the preallocated wq_update_unbound_numa_attrs_buf.
>
> [2,3,4,5,6/7] try to make the per-node allocation are the same in
> wq_update_unbound_numa() and apply_workqueue_attrs(), but they
> are not exactly the same. wq_update_unbound_numa() directly returns
> when the pwq unchanged.
>
> [7/7] adds get_node_unbound_pwq() which uses the per-node allocation
> behavior of the apply_workqueue_attrs(). So wq_update_unbound_numa()
> has some overhead introduced. But cpu-hotplug path is cold path,
> it is Ok.
>
> It removes some comments without adding the corresponding ones back.
>
> Other changed from V1:
> The unneeded comment about the stableness of the wq->unbound_attrs
> is removed in [2/7].
>
> alloc_node_unbound_pwq() is renamed to get_node_unbound_pwq().
> @use_dfl_when_fail is removed from get_node_unbound_pwq().
> get_node_unbound_pwq() is shorter under the help of get_pwq_unlocked().
>
> apply_wqattrs_cleanup() is not protected by wq_pool_mutex
>
> some comment revised as TJ's suguested.
>
> Thanks,
> Lai
>
> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
>
> Lai Jiangshan (7):
> workqueue: wq_pool_mutex protects the attrs-installation
> workqueue: simplify wq_update_unbound_numa()
> workqueue: introduce get_pwq_unlocked()
> workqueue: reuse the current per-node pwq when its attrs unchanged
> workqueue: reuse the current default pwq when its attrs unchanged
> workqueue: reuse wq_update_unbound_numa_attrs_buf as temporary attrs
> workqueue: add get_node_unbound_pwq()
>
> kernel/workqueue.c | 197 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------------
> 1 file changed, 95 insertions(+), 102 deletions(-)
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-18 0:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-12 12:32 [PATCH 0/7 V2] workqueue: cleanup for attr management Lai Jiangshan
2015-05-12 12:32 ` [PATCH 1/7 V2] workqueue: wq_pool_mutex protects the attrs-installation Lai Jiangshan
2015-05-12 12:32 ` [PATCH 2/7 V2] workqueue: simplify wq_update_unbound_numa() Lai Jiangshan
2015-05-18 20:21 ` Tejun Heo
2015-05-12 12:32 ` [PATCH 3/7 V2] workqueue: introduce get_pwq_unlocked() Lai Jiangshan
2015-05-18 20:28 ` Tejun Heo
2015-05-18 20:41 ` Tejun Heo
2015-05-12 12:32 ` [PATCH 4/7 V2] workqueue: reuse the current per-node pwq when its attrs unchanged Lai Jiangshan
2015-05-18 20:34 ` Tejun Heo
2015-05-25 9:47 ` Lai Jiangshan
2015-05-26 18:51 ` Tejun Heo
2015-05-12 12:32 ` [PATCH 5/7 V2] workqueue: reuse the current default " Lai Jiangshan
2015-05-18 20:38 ` Tejun Heo
2015-05-12 12:32 ` [PATCH 6/7 V2] workqueue: reuse wq_update_unbound_numa_attrs_buf as temporary attrs Lai Jiangshan
2015-05-12 12:32 ` [PATCH 7/7 V2] workqueue: add get_node_unbound_pwq() Lai Jiangshan
2015-05-18 0:39 ` Lai Jiangshan [this message]
2015-05-18 1:26 ` [PATCH 0/7 V2] workqueue: cleanup for attr management Tejun Heo
2015-05-18 2:06 ` Lai Jiangshan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=555934B9.7030907@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox