* [PATCH v2][RESEND] perf, x86: Fix multi-segment problem of perf_event_intel_uncore
@ 2015-08-27 10:54 Taku Izumi
2015-09-01 11:15 ` Peter Zijlstra
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Taku Izumi @ 2015-08-27 10:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel, a.p.zijlstra, mingo, acme, hpa, x86; +Cc: Taku Izumi
In multi-segment system, uncore devices may belong to buses whose segment
number is other than 0.
....
0000:ff:10.5 System peripheral: Intel Corporation Xeon E5 v3/Core i7 Scratchpad & Semaphore Registers (rev 03)
...
0001:7f:10.5 System peripheral: Intel Corporation Xeon E5 v3/Core i7 Scratchpad & Semaphore Registers (rev 03)
...
0001:bf:10.5 System peripheral: Intel Corporation Xeon E5 v3/Core i7 Scratchpad & Semaphore Registers (rev 03)
...
0001:ff:10.5 System peripheral: Intel Corporation Xeon E5 v3/Core i7 Scratchpad & Semaphore Registers (rev 03
...
In that case relation of bus number and physical id may be broken
because "uncore_pcibus_to_physid" doesn't take account of PCI segment.
For example, bus 0000:ff and 0001:ff uses the same entry of
"uncore_pcibus_to_physid" array.
This patch fixes ths problem by introducing segment-aware pci2phy_map instead.
v1 -> v2:
- Extract method named uncore_pcibus_to_physid to avoid repetetion of
retrieving phys_id code
Signed-off-by: Taku Izumi <izumi.taku@jp.fujitsu.com>
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.c | 25 ++++++++--
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.h | 11 ++++-
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore_snb.c | 23 +++++++++-
.../x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore_snbep.c | 53 ++++++++++++++++------
4 files changed, 94 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.c
index 21b5e38..0ed6f2b 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.c
@@ -7,7 +7,8 @@ struct intel_uncore_type **uncore_pci_uncores = empty_uncore;
static bool pcidrv_registered;
struct pci_driver *uncore_pci_driver;
/* pci bus to socket mapping */
-int uncore_pcibus_to_physid[256] = { [0 ... 255] = -1, };
+DEFINE_RAW_SPINLOCK(pci2phy_map_lock);
+struct list_head pci2phy_map_head = LIST_HEAD_INIT(pci2phy_map_head);
struct pci_dev *uncore_extra_pci_dev[UNCORE_SOCKET_MAX][UNCORE_EXTRA_PCI_DEV_MAX];
static DEFINE_RAW_SPINLOCK(uncore_box_lock);
@@ -20,6 +21,23 @@ static struct event_constraint uncore_constraint_fixed =
struct event_constraint uncore_constraint_empty =
EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0, 0, 0);
+int uncore_pcibus_to_physid(struct pci_bus *bus)
+{
+ int phys_id = -1;
+ struct pci2phy_map *map;
+
+ raw_spin_lock(&pci2phy_map_lock);
+ list_for_each_entry(map, &pci2phy_map_head, list) {
+ if (map->segment == pci_domain_nr(bus)) {
+ phys_id = map->pbus_to_physid[bus->number];
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+ raw_spin_unlock(&pci2phy_map_lock);
+
+ return phys_id;
+}
+
ssize_t uncore_event_show(struct kobject *kobj,
struct kobj_attribute *attr, char *buf)
{
@@ -809,7 +827,7 @@ static int uncore_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *id
int phys_id;
bool first_box = false;
- phys_id = uncore_pcibus_to_physid[pdev->bus->number];
+ phys_id = uncore_pcibus_to_physid(pdev->bus);
if (phys_id < 0)
return -ENODEV;
@@ -856,9 +874,10 @@ static void uncore_pci_remove(struct pci_dev *pdev)
{
struct intel_uncore_box *box = pci_get_drvdata(pdev);
struct intel_uncore_pmu *pmu;
- int i, cpu, phys_id = uncore_pcibus_to_physid[pdev->bus->number];
+ int i, cpu, phys_id;
bool last_box = false;
+ phys_id = uncore_pcibus_to_physid(pdev->bus);
box = pci_get_drvdata(pdev);
if (!box) {
for (i = 0; i < UNCORE_EXTRA_PCI_DEV_MAX; i++) {
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.h b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.h
index 0f77f0a..6c96ee9 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.h
@@ -117,6 +117,14 @@ struct uncore_event_desc {
const char *config;
};
+struct pci2phy_map {
+ struct list_head list;
+ int segment;
+ int pbus_to_physid[256];
+};
+
+int uncore_pcibus_to_physid(struct pci_bus *bus);
+
ssize_t uncore_event_show(struct kobject *kobj,
struct kobj_attribute *attr, char *buf);
@@ -317,7 +325,8 @@ u64 uncore_shared_reg_config(struct intel_uncore_box *box, int idx);
extern struct intel_uncore_type **uncore_msr_uncores;
extern struct intel_uncore_type **uncore_pci_uncores;
extern struct pci_driver *uncore_pci_driver;
-extern int uncore_pcibus_to_physid[256];
+extern raw_spinlock_t pci2phy_map_lock;
+extern struct list_head pci2phy_map_head;
extern struct pci_dev *uncore_extra_pci_dev[UNCORE_SOCKET_MAX][UNCORE_EXTRA_PCI_DEV_MAX];
extern struct event_constraint uncore_constraint_empty;
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore_snb.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore_snb.c
index b005a78..ccbc817 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore_snb.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore_snb.c
@@ -402,14 +402,35 @@ static int snb_pci2phy_map_init(int devid)
{
struct pci_dev *dev = NULL;
int bus;
+ int segment;
+ struct pci2phy_map *map;
+ bool found = false;
dev = pci_get_device(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, devid, dev);
if (!dev)
return -ENOTTY;
bus = dev->bus->number;
+ segment = pci_domain_nr(dev->bus);
- uncore_pcibus_to_physid[bus] = 0;
+ raw_spin_lock(&pci2phy_map_lock);
+ list_for_each_entry(map, &pci2phy_map_head, list) {
+ if (map->segment == segment) {
+ found = true;
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+ if (!found) {
+ map = kmalloc(sizeof(struct pci2phy_map), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (map) {
+ map->segment = segment;
+ map->pbus_to_physid[bus] = 0;
+ list_add_tail(&map->list, &pci2phy_map_head);
+ }
+ } else {
+ map->pbus_to_physid[bus] = 0;
+ }
+ raw_spin_unlock(&pci2phy_map_lock);
pci_dev_put(dev);
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore_snbep.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore_snbep.c
index 6d6e85d..1becd8b 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore_snbep.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore_snbep.c
@@ -1090,6 +1090,9 @@ static int snbep_pci2phy_map_init(int devid)
int i, bus, nodeid;
int err = 0;
u32 config = 0;
+ struct pci2phy_map *map;
+ int segment;
+ bool found = false;
while (1) {
/* find the UBOX device */
@@ -1106,16 +1109,36 @@ static int snbep_pci2phy_map_init(int devid)
err = pci_read_config_dword(ubox_dev, 0x54, &config);
if (err)
break;
- /*
- * every three bits in the Node ID mapping register maps
- * to a particular node.
- */
- for (i = 0; i < 8; i++) {
- if (nodeid == ((config >> (3 * i)) & 0x7)) {
- uncore_pcibus_to_physid[bus] = i;
+
+ segment = pci_domain_nr(ubox_dev->bus);
+ raw_spin_lock(&pci2phy_map_lock);
+ list_for_each_entry(map, &pci2phy_map_head, list) {
+ if (map->segment == segment) {
+ found = true;
break;
}
}
+ if (!found) {
+ map = kmalloc(sizeof(struct pci2phy_map), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (map) {
+ map->segment = segment;
+ list_add_tail(&map->list, &pci2phy_map_head);
+ }
+ }
+ if (map) {
+ /*
+ * every three bits in the Node ID mapping register
+ * maps to a particular node.
+ */
+ for (i = 0; i < 8; i++) {
+ if (nodeid == ((config >> (3 * i)) & 0x7)) {
+ map->pbus_to_physid[bus] = i;
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+
+ }
+ raw_spin_unlock(&pci2phy_map_lock);
}
if (!err) {
@@ -1123,13 +1146,17 @@ static int snbep_pci2phy_map_init(int devid)
* For PCI bus with no UBOX device, find the next bus
* that has UBOX device and use its mapping.
*/
- i = -1;
- for (bus = 255; bus >= 0; bus--) {
- if (uncore_pcibus_to_physid[bus] >= 0)
- i = uncore_pcibus_to_physid[bus];
- else
- uncore_pcibus_to_physid[bus] = i;
+ raw_spin_lock(&pci2phy_map_lock);
+ list_for_each_entry(map, &pci2phy_map_head, list) {
+ i = -1;
+ for (bus = 255; bus >= 0; bus--) {
+ if (map->pbus_to_physid[bus] >= 0)
+ i = map->pbus_to_physid[bus];
+ else
+ map->pbus_to_physid[bus] = i;
+ }
}
+ raw_spin_unlock(&pci2phy_map_lock);
}
pci_dev_put(ubox_dev);
--
1.8.3.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v2][RESEND] perf, x86: Fix multi-segment problem of perf_event_intel_uncore
2015-08-27 10:54 [PATCH v2][RESEND] perf, x86: Fix multi-segment problem of perf_event_intel_uncore Taku Izumi
@ 2015-09-01 11:15 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-09-01 11:31 ` Ingo Molnar
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Peter Zijlstra @ 2015-09-01 11:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Taku Izumi; +Cc: linux-kernel, mingo, acme, hpa, x86, jolsa
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 07:54:32PM +0900, Taku Izumi wrote:
> This patch fixes ths problem by introducing segment-aware pci2phy_map instead.
>
> v1 -> v2:
> - Extract method named uncore_pcibus_to_physid to avoid repetetion of
> retrieving phys_id code
So close and yet so far...
> + raw_spin_lock(&pci2phy_map_lock);
> + list_for_each_entry(map, &pci2phy_map_head, list) {
> + if (map->segment == segment) {
> + found = true;
> + break;
> + }
> + }
> + if (!found) {
> + map = kmalloc(sizeof(struct pci2phy_map), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (map) {
> + map->segment = segment;
> + map->pbus_to_physid[bus] = 0;
> + list_add_tail(&map->list, &pci2phy_map_head);
> + }
> + } else {
> + map->pbus_to_physid[bus] = 0;
> + }
> + raw_spin_unlock(&pci2phy_map_lock);
> +
> + segment = pci_domain_nr(ubox_dev->bus);
> + raw_spin_lock(&pci2phy_map_lock);
> + list_for_each_entry(map, &pci2phy_map_head, list) {
> + if (map->segment == segment) {
> + found = true;
> break;
> }
> }
> + if (!found) {
> + map = kmalloc(sizeof(struct pci2phy_map), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (map) {
> + map->segment = segment;
> + list_add_tail(&map->list, &pci2phy_map_head);
> + }
> + }
> + if (map) {
> + /*
> + * every three bits in the Node ID mapping register
> + * maps to a particular node.
> + */
> + for (i = 0; i < 8; i++) {
> + if (nodeid == ((config >> (3 * i)) & 0x7)) {
> + map->pbus_to_physid[bus] = i;
> + break;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + }
> + raw_spin_unlock(&pci2phy_map_lock);
> }
Nothing there strikes you as repetitive ?
Also, no mention on the -ENOMEM handling, and you simply _CANNOT_ do a
GFP_KERNEL alloc while holding a spinlock, so I bet you didn't actually
test the patch either.
Maybe something like the below? Equally untested.
---
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.c
@@ -23,8 +23,8 @@ struct event_constraint uncore_constrain
int uncore_pcibus_to_physid(struct pci_bus *bus)
{
- int phys_id = -1;
struct pci2phy_map *map;
+ int phys_id = -1;
raw_spin_lock(&pci2phy_map_lock);
list_for_each_entry(map, &pci2phy_map_head, list) {
@@ -38,6 +38,26 @@ int uncore_pcibus_to_physid(struct pci_b
return phys_id;
}
+struct __find_pci2phy(int segment)
+{
+ struct pci2phy_map *map;
+
+ lockdep_assert_held(&pci2phy_map_lock);
+
+ list_for_each_entry(map, &pci2phy_map_head, list) {
+ if (map->segment == segment)
+ return map;
+ }
+
+ map = kmalloc(sizeof(struct pci2phy_map), GFP_ATOMIC);
+ if (map) {
+ map->segment = segment;
+ list_add_tail(&map->list, &pci2phy_map_head);
+ }
+
+ return map;
+}
+
ssize_t uncore_event_show(struct kobject *kobj,
struct kobj_attribute *attr, char *buf)
{
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore_snb.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore_snb.c
@@ -433,22 +433,12 @@ static int snb_pci2phy_map_init(int devi
segment = pci_domain_nr(dev->bus);
raw_spin_lock(&pci2phy_map_lock);
- list_for_each_entry(map, &pci2phy_map_head, list) {
- if (map->segment == segment) {
- found = true;
- break;
- }
- }
- if (!found) {
- map = kmalloc(sizeof(struct pci2phy_map), GFP_KERNEL);
- if (map) {
- map->segment = segment;
- map->pbus_to_physid[bus] = 0;
- list_add_tail(&map->list, &pci2phy_map_head);
- }
- } else {
- map->pbus_to_physid[bus] = 0;
+ map = __find_phy2pci(segment);
+ if (!map) {
+ raw_spin_unlock(&pci2phy_map_lock);
+ return -ENOMEM;
}
+ map->pbus_to_physid[bus] = 0;
raw_spin_unlock(&pci2phy_map_lock);
pci_dev_put(dev);
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore_snbep.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore_snbep.c
@@ -1112,31 +1112,21 @@ static int snbep_pci2phy_map_init(int de
segment = pci_domain_nr(ubox_dev->bus);
raw_spin_lock(&pci2phy_map_lock);
- list_for_each_entry(map, &pci2phy_map_head, list) {
- if (map->segment == segment) {
- found = true;
- break;
- }
- }
- if (!found) {
- map = kmalloc(sizeof(struct pci2phy_map), GFP_KERNEL);
- if (map) {
- map->segment = segment;
- list_add_tail(&map->list, &pci2phy_map_head);
- }
+ map = __find_pci2phy(segment);
+ if (!map) {
+ err = -ENOMEM;
+ break;
}
- if (map) {
- /*
- * every three bits in the Node ID mapping register
- * maps to a particular node.
- */
- for (i = 0; i < 8; i++) {
- if (nodeid == ((config >> (3 * i)) & 0x7)) {
- map->pbus_to_physid[bus] = i;
- break;
- }
- }
+ /*
+ * every three bits in the Node ID mapping register
+ * maps to a particular node.
+ */
+ for (i = 0; i < 8; i++) {
+ if (nodeid == ((config >> (3 * i)) & 0x7)) {
+ map->pbus_to_physid[bus] = i;
+ break;
+ }
}
raw_spin_unlock(&pci2phy_map_lock);
}
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v2][RESEND] perf, x86: Fix multi-segment problem of perf_event_intel_uncore
2015-09-01 11:15 ` Peter Zijlstra
@ 2015-09-01 11:31 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-09-01 11:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Ingo Molnar @ 2015-09-01 11:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Peter Zijlstra; +Cc: Taku Izumi, linux-kernel, mingo, acme, hpa, x86, jolsa
* Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
> +struct __find_pci2phy(int segment)
> +{
> + struct pci2phy_map *map;
> +
> + lockdep_assert_held(&pci2phy_map_lock);
> +
> + list_for_each_entry(map, &pci2phy_map_head, list) {
> + if (map->segment == segment)
> + return map;
> + }
> +
> + map = kmalloc(sizeof(struct pci2phy_map), GFP_ATOMIC);
I really don't think we should be adding new GFP_ATOMIC allocations whenever it
can be avoided.
Thanks,
Ingo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v2][RESEND] perf, x86: Fix multi-segment problem of perf_event_intel_uncore
2015-09-01 11:31 ` Ingo Molnar
@ 2015-09-01 11:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Peter Zijlstra @ 2015-09-01 11:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ingo Molnar; +Cc: Taku Izumi, linux-kernel, mingo, acme, hpa, x86, jolsa
On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 01:31:47PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
>
> > +struct __find_pci2phy(int segment)
> > +{
> > + struct pci2phy_map *map;
> > +
> > + lockdep_assert_held(&pci2phy_map_lock);
> > +
> > + list_for_each_entry(map, &pci2phy_map_head, list) {
> > + if (map->segment == segment)
> > + return map;
> > + }
> > +
> > + map = kmalloc(sizeof(struct pci2phy_map), GFP_ATOMIC);
>
> I really don't think we should be adding new GFP_ATOMIC allocations whenever it
> can be avoided.
I tend to agree, it makes the whole thing rather fragile...
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-09-01 11:39 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-08-27 10:54 [PATCH v2][RESEND] perf, x86: Fix multi-segment problem of perf_event_intel_uncore Taku Izumi
2015-09-01 11:15 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-09-01 11:31 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-09-01 11:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox