From: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
To: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Cc: Andy Whitcroft <apw@canonical.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] checkpatch: don't encourage new code to use "networking" style comments
Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2017 12:27:22 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170428192721.GA72697@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1493403858.1873.5.camel@perches.com>
On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 11:24:18AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Fri, 2017-04-28 at 10:55 -0700, Brian Norris wrote:
> > Our glorious leader has made his opinion known [1]: the "networking"
> > comment style is not useful for new code.
>
> <shrug> and yet nothing was done.
>
> I think _very_ few people concern themselves one way
> or another.
Right, so why should checkpatch complain? You're adding one more thing
to my mental filter whenever I run checkpatch.
> I believe the only person that actually cares about
> the networking
> comment style is David Miller.
Which is why I've CC'd him. If even *he* doesn't care about having this
warning in checkpatch, then why should anyone else?
> > While the same rules as usual
> > still apply -- e.g., don't unnecessarily churn existing code, and follow
> > existing practice within files -- that doesn't mean that checkpatch
> > should be enforcing that for entire directories. Among other reasons,
> > this can cause automatic patch generators to do the exact wrong thing:
> > convert perfectly good existing code into the "networking style", just
> > because it's in a similar directory.
>
> I believe the patch generator you are referring to is
> checkpatch.
Actually, it was a poor reference to those (people) whose decisions flow
directly from checkpatch (or other code-checking tools) to their
keyboards. It's best not to encourage them, IMO.
Brian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-04-28 19:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-04-28 17:55 [PATCH] checkpatch: don't encourage new code to use "networking" style comments Brian Norris
2017-04-28 18:24 ` Joe Perches
2017-04-28 19:27 ` Brian Norris [this message]
2017-04-28 19:31 ` David Miller
2017-04-28 19:51 ` Brian Norris
2017-04-28 21:05 ` Joe Perches
2017-04-28 19:36 ` Joe Perches
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170428192721.GA72697@google.com \
--to=briannorris@chromium.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=apw@canonical.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=joe@perches.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox