public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@fb.com, pjt@google.com,
	dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, mingo@redhat.com,
	morten.rasmussen@arm.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
	mgorman@techsingularity.net, vincent.guittot@linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/14] sched,fair: move runnable_load_avg to cfs_rq
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2019 10:55:41 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190730085541.GU31398@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190722173348.9241-5-riel@surriel.com>

On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 01:33:38PM -0400, Rik van Riel wrote:
> Since only the root cfs_rq runnable_load_avg field is used any more,
> we can move the field from struct sched_avg, which every sched_entity
> has one of, directly into the struct cfs_rq, of which we have way fewer.
> 
> No functional changes.
> 
> Suggested-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>

I think he's praying on space in that cacheline ;-)

  reply	other threads:[~2019-07-30  8:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-07-22 17:33 [PATCH RFC v3 0/14] sched,fair: flatten CPU controller runqueues Rik van Riel
2019-07-22 17:33 ` [PATCH 01/14] sched: introduce task_se_h_load helper Rik van Riel
2019-08-12 17:40   ` Dietmar Eggemann
2019-07-22 17:33 ` [PATCH 02/14] sched: change /proc/sched_debug fields Rik van Riel
2019-07-22 17:33 ` [PATCH 03/14] sched,fair: redefine runnable_load_avg as the sum of task_h_load Rik van Riel
2019-07-29 20:05   ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-07-29 21:13     ` Rik van Riel
2019-07-29 20:11   ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-07-29 20:26   ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-07-22 17:33 ` [PATCH 04/14] sched,fair: move runnable_load_avg to cfs_rq Rik van Riel
2019-07-30  8:55   ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2019-07-22 17:33 ` [PATCH 06/14] sched,cfs: use explicit cfs_rq of parent se helper Rik van Riel
2019-07-22 17:33 ` [PATCH 07/14] sched,cfs: fix zero length timeslice calculation Rik van Riel
2019-07-22 17:33 ` [PATCH 08/14] sched,fair: simplify timeslice length code Rik van Riel
2019-07-22 17:33 ` [PATCH 09/14] sched,fair: refactor enqueue/dequeue_entity Rik van Riel
2019-07-30  9:36   ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-07-30 12:58     ` Rik van Riel
2019-07-31  9:35     ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-07-31 15:03       ` Rik van Riel
2019-07-31 15:30         ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-07-22 17:33 ` [PATCH 10/14] sched,fair: add helper functions for flattened runqueue Rik van Riel
2019-07-22 17:33 ` [PATCH 11/14] sched,fair: flatten hierarchical runqueues Rik van Riel
2019-07-22 17:33 ` [PATCH 12/14] sched,fair: track cfs_rq->max_h_load for more legitimate h_weight Rik van Riel
2019-07-22 17:33 ` [PATCH 13/14] sched,fair: flatten update_curr functionality Rik van Riel
2019-07-22 17:33 ` [PATCH 14/14] sched,fair: propagate sum_exec_runtime up the hierarchy Rik van Riel
2019-07-30 16:29 ` [PATCH RFC v3 0/14] sched,fair: flatten CPU controller runqueues Peter Zijlstra
2019-07-30 18:27   ` Rik van Riel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190730085541.GU31398@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=morten.rasmussen@arm.com \
    --cc=pjt@google.com \
    --cc=riel@surriel.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox