public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@fb.com, pjt@google.com,
	dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, mingo@redhat.com,
	morten.rasmussen@arm.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
	mgorman@techsingularity.net, vincent.guittot@linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/14] sched,fair: refactor enqueue/dequeue_entity
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2019 11:36:17 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190730093617.GV31398@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190722173348.9241-10-riel@surriel.com>

On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 01:33:43PM -0400, Rik van Riel wrote:
> Refactor enqueue_entity, dequeue_entity, and update_load_avg, in order
> to split out the things we still want to happen at every level in the
> cgroup hierarchy with a flat runqueue from the things we only need to
> happen once.
> 
> No functional changes.

> @@ -3500,7 +3500,7 @@ static void detach_entity_load_avg(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *s
>  #define DO_ATTACH	0x4
>  
>  /* Update task and its cfs_rq load average */
> -static inline void update_load_avg(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se, int flags)
> +static inline bool update_load_avg(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se, int flags)
>  {
>  	u64 now = cfs_rq_clock_pelt(cfs_rq);
>  	int decayed;
> @@ -3529,6 +3529,8 @@ static inline void update_load_avg(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *s
>  
>  	} else if (decayed && (flags & UPDATE_TG))
>  		update_tg_load_avg(cfs_rq, 0);
> +
> +	return decayed;
>  }
>  
>  #ifndef CONFIG_64BIT
> @@ -3745,9 +3747,10 @@ static inline void update_misfit_status(struct task_struct *p, struct rq *rq)
>  #define SKIP_AGE_LOAD	0x0
>  #define DO_ATTACH	0x0
>  
> -static inline void update_load_avg(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se, int not_used1)
> +static inline bool update_load_avg(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se, int not_used1)
>  {
>  	cfs_rq_util_change(cfs_rq, 0);
> +	return false;
>  }
>  
>  static inline void remove_entity_load_avg(struct sched_entity *se) {}
> @@ -3870,6 +3873,24 @@ static inline void check_schedstat_required(void)
>   * CPU and an up-to-date min_vruntime on the destination CPU.
>   */
>  
> +static bool
> +enqueue_entity_groups(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se, int flags)
> +{
> +	/*
> +	 * When enqueuing a sched_entity, we must:
> +	 *   - Update loads to have both entity and cfs_rq synced with now.
> +	 *   - Add its load to cfs_rq->runnable_avg
> +	 *   - For group_entity, update its weight to reflect the new share of
> +	 *     its group cfs_rq
> +	 *   - Add its new weight to cfs_rq->load.weight
> +	 */
> +	if (!update_load_avg(cfs_rq, se, UPDATE_TG | DO_ATTACH))
> +		return false;
> +
> +	update_cfs_group(se);
> +	return true;
> +}
> +
>  static void
>  enqueue_entity(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se, int flags)
>  {
> @@ -3894,16 +3915,6 @@ enqueue_entity(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se, int flags)
>  	if (renorm && !curr)
>  		se->vruntime += cfs_rq->min_vruntime;
>  
> -	/*
> -	 * When enqueuing a sched_entity, we must:
> -	 *   - Update loads to have both entity and cfs_rq synced with now.
> -	 *   - Add its load to cfs_rq->runnable_avg
> -	 *   - For group_entity, update its weight to reflect the new share of
> -	 *     its group cfs_rq
> -	 *   - Add its new weight to cfs_rq->load.weight
> -	 */
> -	update_load_avg(cfs_rq, se, UPDATE_TG | DO_ATTACH);
> -	update_cfs_group(se);
>  	enqueue_runnable_load_avg(cfs_rq, se);
>  	account_entity_enqueue(cfs_rq, se);
>  

No functional, but you did make update_cfs_group() conditional. Now that
looks OK, but maybe you can do that part in a separate patch with a
little justification of its own.

  reply	other threads:[~2019-07-30  9:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-07-22 17:33 [PATCH RFC v3 0/14] sched,fair: flatten CPU controller runqueues Rik van Riel
2019-07-22 17:33 ` [PATCH 01/14] sched: introduce task_se_h_load helper Rik van Riel
2019-08-12 17:40   ` Dietmar Eggemann
2019-07-22 17:33 ` [PATCH 02/14] sched: change /proc/sched_debug fields Rik van Riel
2019-07-22 17:33 ` [PATCH 03/14] sched,fair: redefine runnable_load_avg as the sum of task_h_load Rik van Riel
2019-07-29 20:05   ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-07-29 21:13     ` Rik van Riel
2019-07-29 20:11   ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-07-29 20:26   ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-07-22 17:33 ` [PATCH 04/14] sched,fair: move runnable_load_avg to cfs_rq Rik van Riel
2019-07-30  8:55   ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-07-22 17:33 ` [PATCH 06/14] sched,cfs: use explicit cfs_rq of parent se helper Rik van Riel
2019-07-22 17:33 ` [PATCH 07/14] sched,cfs: fix zero length timeslice calculation Rik van Riel
2019-07-22 17:33 ` [PATCH 08/14] sched,fair: simplify timeslice length code Rik van Riel
2019-07-22 17:33 ` [PATCH 09/14] sched,fair: refactor enqueue/dequeue_entity Rik van Riel
2019-07-30  9:36   ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2019-07-30 12:58     ` Rik van Riel
2019-07-31  9:35     ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-07-31 15:03       ` Rik van Riel
2019-07-31 15:30         ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-07-22 17:33 ` [PATCH 10/14] sched,fair: add helper functions for flattened runqueue Rik van Riel
2019-07-22 17:33 ` [PATCH 11/14] sched,fair: flatten hierarchical runqueues Rik van Riel
2019-07-22 17:33 ` [PATCH 12/14] sched,fair: track cfs_rq->max_h_load for more legitimate h_weight Rik van Riel
2019-07-22 17:33 ` [PATCH 13/14] sched,fair: flatten update_curr functionality Rik van Riel
2019-07-22 17:33 ` [PATCH 14/14] sched,fair: propagate sum_exec_runtime up the hierarchy Rik van Riel
2019-07-30 16:29 ` [PATCH RFC v3 0/14] sched,fair: flatten CPU controller runqueues Peter Zijlstra
2019-07-30 18:27   ` Rik van Riel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190730093617.GV31398@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=morten.rasmussen@arm.com \
    --cc=pjt@google.com \
    --cc=riel@surriel.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox