public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Cc: kbuild-all@lists.01.org, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
	Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/8] locking/lockdep: Decrement irq context counters when removing lock chain
Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2020 02:14:15 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <202001180106.8H2uIiid%lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200115214313.13253-2-longman@redhat.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3940 bytes --]

Hi Waiman,

Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:

[auto build test ERROR on tip/locking/core]
[also build test ERROR on tip/auto-latest linus/master arm-perf/for-next/perf v5.5-rc6 next-20200117]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system. BTW, we also suggest to use '--base' option to specify the
base tree in git format-patch, please see https://stackoverflow.com/a/37406982]

url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Waiman-Long/locking-lockdep-Reuse-zapped-chain_hlocks-entries/20200117-093009
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git 1a365e822372ba24c9da0822bc583894f6f3d821
config: sparc64-allmodconfig (attached as .config)
compiler: sparc64-linux-gcc (GCC) 7.5.0
reproduce:
        wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
        chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
        # save the attached .config to linux build tree
        GCC_VERSION=7.5.0 make.cross ARCH=sparc64 

If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag
Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>

All error/warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):

   kernel/locking/lockdep.c: In function 'inc_chains':
>> kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2304:20: error: 'LOCK_CHAIN_HARDIRQ_CONTEXT' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'LOCK_USED_IN_HARDIRQ_READ'?
     if (irq_context & LOCK_CHAIN_HARDIRQ_CONTEXT)
                       ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
                       LOCK_USED_IN_HARDIRQ_READ
   kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2304:20: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
>> kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2306:25: error: 'LOCK_CHAIN_SOFTIRQ_CONTEXT' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'LOCK_CHAIN_HARDIRQ_CONTEXT'?
     else if (irq_context & LOCK_CHAIN_SOFTIRQ_CONTEXT)
                            ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
                            LOCK_CHAIN_HARDIRQ_CONTEXT
   kernel/locking/lockdep.c: In function 'dec_chains':
   kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2314:20: error: 'LOCK_CHAIN_HARDIRQ_CONTEXT' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'LOCK_USED_IN_HARDIRQ_READ'?
     if (irq_context & LOCK_CHAIN_HARDIRQ_CONTEXT)
                       ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
                       LOCK_USED_IN_HARDIRQ_READ
   kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2316:25: error: 'LOCK_CHAIN_SOFTIRQ_CONTEXT' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'LOCK_CHAIN_HARDIRQ_CONTEXT'?
     else if (irq_context & LOCK_CHAIN_SOFTIRQ_CONTEXT)
                            ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
                            LOCK_CHAIN_HARDIRQ_CONTEXT
   kernel/locking/lockdep.c: In function 'task_irq_context':
   kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3612:9: error: 'LOCK_CHAIN_HARDIRQ_CONTEXT' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'LOCK_USED_IN_HARDIRQ_READ'?
     return LOCK_CHAIN_HARDIRQ_CONTEXT * !!task->hardirq_context +
            ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
            LOCK_USED_IN_HARDIRQ_READ
   kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3613:9: error: 'LOCK_CHAIN_SOFTIRQ_CONTEXT' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'LOCK_CHAIN_HARDIRQ_CONTEXT'?
            LOCK_CHAIN_SOFTIRQ_CONTEXT * !!task->softirq_context;
            ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
            LOCK_CHAIN_HARDIRQ_CONTEXT
>> kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3614:1: warning: control reaches end of non-void function [-Wreturn-type]
    }
    ^

vim +2304 kernel/locking/lockdep.c

  2301	
  2302	static void inc_chains(int irq_context)
  2303	{
> 2304		if (irq_context & LOCK_CHAIN_HARDIRQ_CONTEXT)
  2305			nr_hardirq_chains++;
> 2306		else if (irq_context & LOCK_CHAIN_SOFTIRQ_CONTEXT)
  2307			nr_softirq_chains++;
  2308		else
  2309			nr_process_chains++;
  2310	}
  2311	

---
0-DAY kernel test infrastructure                 Open Source Technology Center
https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org Intel Corporation

[-- Attachment #2: .config.gz --]
[-- Type: application/gzip, Size: 59412 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-01-17 18:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-01-15 21:43 [PATCH v3 0/8] locking/lockdep: Reuse zapped chain_hlocks entries Waiman Long
2020-01-15 21:43 ` [PATCH v3 1/8] locking/lockdep: Decrement irq context counters when removing lock chain Waiman Long
2020-01-16 15:32   ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-01-16 15:50     ` Waiman Long
2020-01-17 18:14   ` kbuild test robot [this message]
2020-01-15 21:43 ` [PATCH v3 2/8] locking/lockdep: Display irq_context names in /proc/lockdep_chains Waiman Long
2020-01-17 22:12   ` kbuild test robot
2020-01-15 21:43 ` [PATCH v3 3/8] locking/lockdep: Track number of zapped classes Waiman Long
2020-01-15 21:43 ` [PATCH v3 4/8] locking/lockdep: Throw away all lock chains with zapped class Waiman Long
2020-01-15 21:43 ` [PATCH v3 5/8] locking/lockdep: Track number of zapped lock chains Waiman Long
2020-01-15 21:43 ` [PATCH v3 6/8] locking/lockdep: Reuse freed chain_hlocks entries Waiman Long
2020-01-16 21:13   ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-01-20  4:22     ` Waiman Long
2020-01-17  5:51   ` kbuild test robot
2020-01-15 21:43 ` [PATCH v3 7/8] locking/lockdep: Add lockdep_early_init() before any lock is taken Waiman Long
2020-01-15 21:43 ` [PATCH v3 8/8] locking/lockdep: Enable chain block splitting as last resort Waiman Long

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=202001180106.8H2uIiid%lkp@intel.com \
    --to=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=kbuild-all@lists.01.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=longman@redhat.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox