Re: [PATCH v3 2/8] locking/lockdep: Display irq_context names in /proc/lockdep_chains

[kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3790 bytes --]

Hi Waiman,

Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:

[auto build test ERROR on tip/locking/core]
[also build test ERROR on tip/auto-latest linus/master arm-perf/for-next/perf v5.5-rc6 next-20200117]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system. BTW, we also suggest to use '--base' option to specify the
base tree in git format-patch, please see https://stackoverflow.com/a/37406982]

url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Waiman-Long/locking-lockdep-Reuse-zapped-chain_hlocks-entries/20200117-093009
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git 1a365e822372ba24c9da0822bc583894f6f3d821
config: sparc64-allmodconfig (attached as .config)
compiler: sparc64-linux-gcc (GCC) 7.5.0
reproduce:
        wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
        chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
        # save the attached .config to linux build tree
        GCC_VERSION=7.5.0 make.cross ARCH=sparc64 

If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag
Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>

All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):

   kernel/locking/lockdep_proc.c: In function 'lc_show':
>> kernel/locking/lockdep_proc.c:133:4: error: 'LOCK_CHAIN_HARDIRQ_CONTEXT' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'LOCK_USED_IN_HARDIRQ_READ'?
      [LOCK_CHAIN_HARDIRQ_CONTEXT] = "hardirq",
       ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
       LOCK_USED_IN_HARDIRQ_READ
   kernel/locking/lockdep_proc.c:133:4: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
>> kernel/locking/lockdep_proc.c:133:4: error: array index in initializer not of integer type
   kernel/locking/lockdep_proc.c:133:4: note: (near initialization for 'irq_strs')
>> kernel/locking/lockdep_proc.c:134:4: error: 'LOCK_CHAIN_SOFTIRQ_CONTEXT' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'LOCK_CHAIN_HARDIRQ_CONTEXT'?
      [LOCK_CHAIN_SOFTIRQ_CONTEXT] = "softirq",
       ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
       LOCK_CHAIN_HARDIRQ_CONTEXT
   kernel/locking/lockdep_proc.c:134:4: error: array index in initializer not of integer type
   kernel/locking/lockdep_proc.c:134:4: note: (near initialization for 'irq_strs')
   kernel/locking/lockdep_proc.c:135:4: error: array index in initializer not of integer type
      [LOCK_CHAIN_SOFTIRQ_CONTEXT|
       ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   kernel/locking/lockdep_proc.c:135:4: note: (near initialization for 'irq_strs')

vim +133 kernel/locking/lockdep_proc.c

   125	
   126	static int lc_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
   127	{
   128		struct lock_chain *chain = v;
   129		struct lock_class *class;
   130		int i;
   131		static const char * const irq_strs[] = {
   132			[0]			     = "0",
 > 133			[LOCK_CHAIN_HARDIRQ_CONTEXT] = "hardirq",
 > 134			[LOCK_CHAIN_SOFTIRQ_CONTEXT] = "softirq",
   135			[LOCK_CHAIN_SOFTIRQ_CONTEXT|
   136			 LOCK_CHAIN_HARDIRQ_CONTEXT] = "hardirq|softirq",
   137		};
   138	
   139		if (v == SEQ_START_TOKEN) {
   140			if (nr_chain_hlocks > MAX_LOCKDEP_CHAIN_HLOCKS)
   141				seq_printf(m, "(buggered) ");
   142			seq_printf(m, "all lock chains:\n");
   143			return 0;
   144		}
   145	
   146		seq_printf(m, "irq_context: %s\n", irq_strs[chain->irq_context]);
   147	
   148		for (i = 0; i < chain->depth; i++) {
   149			class = lock_chain_get_class(chain, i);
   150			if (!class->key)
   151				continue;
   152	
   153			seq_printf(m, "[%p] ", class->key);
   154			print_name(m, class);
   155			seq_puts(m, "\n");
   156		}
   157		seq_puts(m, "\n");
   158	
   159		return 0;
   160	}
   161	

---
0-DAY kernel test infrastructure                 Open Source Technology Center
https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org Intel Corporation

[-- Attachment #2: .config.gz --]
[-- Type: application/gzip, Size: 59412 bytes --]