public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Like Xu <like.xu@linux.intel.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
	Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>,
	Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>
Cc: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>,
	Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	Liran Alon <liran.alon@oracle.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
	Liang Kan <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>,
	Wei Wang <wei.w.wang@intel.com>,
	Like Xu <like.xu@linux.intel.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v9 08/10] KVM: x86/pmu: Release guest LBR event via vPMU lazy release mechanism
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2020 10:16:14 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200313021616.112322-9-like.xu@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200313021616.112322-1-like.xu@linux.intel.com>

The guest LBR event uses bit 58 in pmu->pmc_in_use (which is also the
LBRS_FROZEN bit in GLOBAL_STATUS) to indicate whether the event is still
needed by the vcpu. If the guest no longer accesses the LBR related MSRs
within a scheduling time slice and the enable bit of LBR is unset, vPMU
would treat the guest LBR event as a bland event of a vPMC counter and
release it as usual and the pass-through state of stack MSRs is canceled.

Signed-off-by: Like Xu <like.xu@linux.intel.com>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/pmu.c           |  9 +++++++++
 arch/x86/kvm/pmu.h           |  4 ++++
 arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 29 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.c
index 84b5ec50ca6d..57859ff8b118 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.c
@@ -449,6 +449,12 @@ static inline bool pmc_speculative_in_use(struct kvm_pmc *pmc)
 	return pmc->eventsel & ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL_ENABLE;
 }
 
+void kvm_pmu_lbr_cleanup(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+	if (kvm_x86_ops->pmu_ops->lbr_cleanup)
+		kvm_x86_ops->pmu_ops->lbr_cleanup(vcpu);
+}
+
 /* Release perf_events for vPMCs that have been unused for a full time slice.  */
 void kvm_pmu_cleanup(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 {
@@ -467,6 +473,9 @@ void kvm_pmu_cleanup(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 
 		if (pmc && pmc->perf_event && !pmc_speculative_in_use(pmc))
 			pmc_stop_counter(pmc);
+
+		if (i == KVM_PMU_LBR_IN_USE_IDX)
+			kvm_pmu_lbr_cleanup(vcpu);
 	}
 
 	bitmap_zero(pmu->pmc_in_use, X86_PMC_IDX_MAX);
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.h b/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.h
index 3ddff3972b8d..d4ef7ec3331d 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.h
@@ -15,6 +15,9 @@
 #define VMWARE_BACKDOOR_PMC_REAL_TIME		0x10001
 #define VMWARE_BACKDOOR_PMC_APPARENT_TIME	0x10002
 
+/* Indicate if the LBR MSRs were accessed during a time slice */
+#define KVM_PMU_LBR_IN_USE_IDX GLOBAL_STATUS_LBRS_FROZEN_BIT
+
 struct kvm_event_hw_type_mapping {
 	u8 eventsel;
 	u8 unit_mask;
@@ -38,6 +41,7 @@ struct kvm_pmu_ops {
 	void (*init)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
 	void (*reset)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
 	bool (*lbr_setup)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
+	void (*lbr_cleanup)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
 	void (*availability_check)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
 };
 
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c
index 92627f31cda3..bbb5f4c63f52 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c
@@ -316,6 +316,7 @@ static bool intel_pmu_access_lbr_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 		msr_info->data = 0;
 	local_irq_enable();
 
+	__set_bit(KVM_PMU_LBR_IN_USE_IDX, pmu->pmc_in_use);
 	return true;
 }
 
@@ -415,6 +416,8 @@ static int intel_pmu_set_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr_info)
 			wrmsrl_safe(MSR_CORE_PERF_GLOBAL_OVF_CTRL,
 					GLOBAL_STATUS_LBRS_FROZEN);
 		}
+		if (pmu->lbr_event)
+			__set_bit(KVM_PMU_LBR_IN_USE_IDX, pmu->pmc_in_use);
 		return 0;
 	default:
 		if ((pmc = get_gp_pmc(pmu, msr, MSR_IA32_PERFCTR0))) {
@@ -508,6 +511,7 @@ static void intel_pmu_refresh(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 		0, pmu->nr_arch_gp_counters);
 	bitmap_set(pmu->all_valid_pmc_idx,
 		INTEL_PMC_MAX_GENERIC, pmu->nr_arch_fixed_counters);
+	bitmap_set(pmu->all_valid_pmc_idx, KVM_PMU_LBR_IN_USE_IDX, 1);
 
 	nested_vmx_pmu_entry_exit_ctls_update(vcpu);
 }
@@ -620,6 +624,17 @@ void intel_pmu_availability_check(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 		intel_pmu_lbr_availability_check(vcpu);
 }
 
+static void intel_pmu_cleanup_lbr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+	struct kvm_pmu *pmu = vcpu_to_pmu(vcpu);
+
+	if (!pmu->lbr_event)
+		return;
+
+	if (!(vmcs_read64(GUEST_IA32_DEBUGCTL) & DEBUGCTLMSR_LBR))
+		intel_pmu_free_lbr_event(vcpu);
+}
+
 struct kvm_pmu_ops intel_pmu_ops = {
 	.find_arch_event = intel_find_arch_event,
 	.find_fixed_event = intel_find_fixed_event,
@@ -636,4 +651,5 @@ struct kvm_pmu_ops intel_pmu_ops = {
 	.reset = intel_pmu_reset,
 	.lbr_setup = intel_pmu_setup_lbr,
 	.availability_check = intel_pmu_availability_check,
+	.lbr_cleanup = intel_pmu_cleanup_lbr,
 };
-- 
2.21.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-03-13  2:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-03-13  2:16 [PATCH v9 00/10] Guest Last Branch Recording Enabling Like Xu
2020-03-13  2:16 ` [PATCH v9 01/10] perf/x86: Fix msr variable type for the LBR msrs Like Xu
2020-03-13  2:16 ` [PATCH v9 02/10] perf/x86/lbr: Add interface to get basic information about LBR stack Like Xu
2020-03-13  2:16 ` [PATCH v9 03/10] perf/x86: Add constraint to create guest LBR event without hw counter Like Xu
2020-04-09 16:37   ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-04-10  3:03     ` Xu, Like
2020-04-17  8:40       ` Xu, Like
2020-04-17 10:30       ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-03-13  2:16 ` [PATCH v9 04/10] perf/x86: Keep LBR stack unchanged on the host for guest LBR event Like Xu
2020-04-09 16:45   ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-04-10  3:10     ` Xu, Like
2020-03-13  2:16 ` [PATCH v9 05/10] KVM: x86: Add KVM_CAP_X86_GUEST_LBR interface to dis/enable LBR feature Like Xu
2020-03-13  2:16 ` [PATCH v9 06/10] KVM: x86/pmu: Tweak kvm_pmu_get_msr to pass 'struct msr_data' in Like Xu
2020-03-13  2:16 ` [PATCH v9 07/10] KVM: x86/pmu: Add LBR feature emulation via guest LBR event Like Xu
2020-03-13  2:16 ` Like Xu [this message]
2020-03-13  2:16 ` [PATCH v9 09/10] KVM: x86: Expose MSR_IA32_PERF_CAPABILITIES to guest for LBR record format Like Xu
2020-03-13  2:16 ` [PATCH v9 10/10] KVM: x86: Remove the common trap handler of the MSR_IA32_DEBUGCTLMSR Like Xu
2020-03-20  8:45 ` [PATCH v9 00/10] Guest Last Branch Recording Enabling Xu, Like
2020-04-02 12:59   ` Xu, Like

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200313021616.112322-9-like.xu@linux.intel.com \
    --to=like.xu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=jmattson@google.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=liran.alon@oracle.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
    --cc=wei.w.wang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox