* [PATCH 5.15 02/79] arm64/mm: Consolidate TCR_EL1 fields
2022-10-27 16:54 [PATCH 5.15 00/79] 5.15.76-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
@ 2022-10-27 16:55 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-10-27 18:18 ` [PATCH 5.15 00/79] 5.15.76-rc1 review Guenter Roeck
` (4 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman @ 2022-10-27 16:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: stable
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman, patches, Catalin Marinas, Will Deacon,
linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel, Anshuman Khandual,
Evgenii Stepanov
From: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
commit e921da6bc7cac5f0e8458fe5df18ae08eb538f54 upstream.
This renames and moves SYS_TCR_EL1_TCMA1 and SYS_TCR_EL1_TCMA0 definitions
into pgtable-hwdef.h thus consolidating all TCR fields in a single header.
This does not cause any functional change.
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1643121513-21854-1-git-send-email-anshuman.khandual@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Evgenii Stepanov <eugenis@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable-hwdef.h | 2 ++
arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h | 4 ----
arch/arm64/mm/proc.S | 2 +-
3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable-hwdef.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable-hwdef.h
@@ -273,6 +273,8 @@
#define TCR_NFD1 (UL(1) << 54)
#define TCR_E0PD0 (UL(1) << 55)
#define TCR_E0PD1 (UL(1) << 56)
+#define TCR_TCMA0 (UL(1) << 57)
+#define TCR_TCMA1 (UL(1) << 58)
/*
* TTBR.
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h
@@ -1094,10 +1094,6 @@
#define CPACR_EL1_ZEN_EL0EN (BIT(17)) /* enable EL0 access, if EL1EN set */
#define CPACR_EL1_ZEN (CPACR_EL1_ZEN_EL1EN | CPACR_EL1_ZEN_EL0EN)
-/* TCR EL1 Bit Definitions */
-#define SYS_TCR_EL1_TCMA1 (BIT(58))
-#define SYS_TCR_EL1_TCMA0 (BIT(57))
-
/* GCR_EL1 Definitions */
#define SYS_GCR_EL1_RRND (BIT(16))
#define SYS_GCR_EL1_EXCL_MASK 0xffffUL
--- a/arch/arm64/mm/proc.S
+++ b/arch/arm64/mm/proc.S
@@ -46,7 +46,7 @@
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_KASAN_HW_TAGS
-#define TCR_MTE_FLAGS SYS_TCR_EL1_TCMA1 | TCR_TBI1 | TCR_TBID1
+#define TCR_MTE_FLAGS TCR_TCMA1 | TCR_TBI1 | TCR_TBID1
#else
/*
* The mte_zero_clear_page_tags() implementation uses DC GZVA, which relies on
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.15 00/79] 5.15.76-rc1 review
2022-10-27 16:54 [PATCH 5.15 00/79] 5.15.76-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-10-27 16:55 ` [PATCH 5.15 02/79] arm64/mm: Consolidate TCR_EL1 fields Greg Kroah-Hartman
@ 2022-10-27 18:18 ` Guenter Roeck
2022-10-28 10:42 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-10-28 3:46 ` Bagas Sanjaya
` (3 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Guenter Roeck @ 2022-10-27 18:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable
Cc: patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw
On 10/27/22 09:54, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.76 release.
> There are 79 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 29 Oct 2022 16:50:35 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
Building arm64:allmodconfig ... failed
--------------
Error log:
In file included from drivers/cpufreq/tegra194-cpufreq.c:10:
drivers/cpufreq/tegra194-cpufreq.c:282:25: error: 'tegra194_cpufreq_of_match' undeclared here (not in a function); did you mean 'tegra194_cpufreq_data'?
282 | MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, tegra194_cpufreq_of_match);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/module.h:244:15: note: in definition of macro 'MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE'
244 | extern typeof(name) __mod_##type##__##name##_device_table \
| ^~~~
include/linux/module.h:244:21: error: conflicting types for '__mod_of__tegra194_cpufreq_of_match_device_table'; have 'const struct of_device_id[2]'
244 | extern typeof(name) __mod_##type##__##name##_device_table \
| ^~~~~~
drivers/cpufreq/tegra194-cpufreq.c:417:1: note: in expansion of macro 'MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE'
417 | MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, tegra194_cpufreq_of_match);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/module.h:244:21: note: previous declaration of '__mod_of__tegra194_cpufreq_of_match_device_table' with type 'int'
244 | extern typeof(name) __mod_##type##__##name##_device_table \
| ^~~~~~
drivers/cpufreq/tegra194-cpufreq.c:282:1: note: in expansion of macro 'MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE'
282 | MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, tegra194_cpufreq_of_match);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
make[3]: [scripts/Makefile.build:289: drivers/cpufreq/tegra194-cpufreq.o] Error 1 (ignored)
ERROR: modpost: missing MODULE_LICENSE() in drivers/cpufreq/tegra194-cpufreq.o
make[2]: [scripts/Makefile.modpost:133: modules-only.symvers] Error 1 (ignored)
I don't know what exactly happened, but commit b281adc68db8 ("cpufreq:
tegra194: Fix module loading") introduces a second MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE
at the wrong location, causing the build failure.
Guenter
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.15 00/79] 5.15.76-rc1 review
2022-10-27 18:18 ` [PATCH 5.15 00/79] 5.15.76-rc1 review Guenter Roeck
@ 2022-10-28 10:42 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman @ 2022-10-28 10:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Guenter Roeck
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, srw
On Thu, Oct 27, 2022 at 11:18:42AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 10/27/22 09:54, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.76 release.
> > There are 79 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Sat, 29 Oct 2022 16:50:35 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
> Building arm64:allmodconfig ... failed
> --------------
> Error log:
> In file included from drivers/cpufreq/tegra194-cpufreq.c:10:
> drivers/cpufreq/tegra194-cpufreq.c:282:25: error: 'tegra194_cpufreq_of_match' undeclared here (not in a function); did you mean 'tegra194_cpufreq_data'?
> 282 | MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, tegra194_cpufreq_of_match);
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> include/linux/module.h:244:15: note: in definition of macro 'MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE'
> 244 | extern typeof(name) __mod_##type##__##name##_device_table \
> | ^~~~
> include/linux/module.h:244:21: error: conflicting types for '__mod_of__tegra194_cpufreq_of_match_device_table'; have 'const struct of_device_id[2]'
> 244 | extern typeof(name) __mod_##type##__##name##_device_table \
> | ^~~~~~
> drivers/cpufreq/tegra194-cpufreq.c:417:1: note: in expansion of macro 'MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE'
> 417 | MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, tegra194_cpufreq_of_match);
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> include/linux/module.h:244:21: note: previous declaration of '__mod_of__tegra194_cpufreq_of_match_device_table' with type 'int'
> 244 | extern typeof(name) __mod_##type##__##name##_device_table \
> | ^~~~~~
> drivers/cpufreq/tegra194-cpufreq.c:282:1: note: in expansion of macro 'MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE'
> 282 | MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, tegra194_cpufreq_of_match);
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> make[3]: [scripts/Makefile.build:289: drivers/cpufreq/tegra194-cpufreq.o] Error 1 (ignored)
> ERROR: modpost: missing MODULE_LICENSE() in drivers/cpufreq/tegra194-cpufreq.o
> make[2]: [scripts/Makefile.modpost:133: modules-only.symvers] Error 1 (ignored)
>
> I don't know what exactly happened, but commit b281adc68db8 ("cpufreq:
> tegra194: Fix module loading") introduces a second MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE
> at the wrong location, causing the build failure.
Ah, the "Fixes:" tag was wrong in the original commit in Linus's tree.
It should have said:
Fixes: 0839ed1fd7ac ("cpufreq: tegra194: add soc data to support multiple soc")
which removed the existing MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE() entry.
So only kernels newer than 5.19 need this. I'll go drop it from the
5.10.y and 5.15.y queues, thanks!
greg k-h
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 5.15 00/79] 5.15.76-rc1 review
2022-10-27 16:54 [PATCH 5.15 00/79] 5.15.76-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-10-27 16:55 ` [PATCH 5.15 02/79] arm64/mm: Consolidate TCR_EL1 fields Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-10-27 18:18 ` [PATCH 5.15 00/79] 5.15.76-rc1 review Guenter Roeck
@ 2022-10-28 3:46 ` Bagas Sanjaya
2022-10-28 9:58 ` Naresh Kamboju
` (2 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Bagas Sanjaya @ 2022-10-28 3:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 539 bytes --]
On Thu, Oct 27, 2022 at 06:54:58PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.76 release.
> There are 79 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
Successfully cross-compiled for arm64 (bcm2711_defconfig, GCC 10.2.0) and
powerpc (ps3_defconfig, GCC 12.1.0).
Tested-by: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com>
--
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.15 00/79] 5.15.76-rc1 review
2022-10-27 16:54 [PATCH 5.15 00/79] 5.15.76-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2022-10-28 3:46 ` Bagas Sanjaya
@ 2022-10-28 9:58 ` Naresh Kamboju
2022-10-28 10:40 ` Sudip Mukherjee (Codethink)
2022-10-28 11:58 ` Jon Hunter
5 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Naresh Kamboju @ 2022-10-28 9:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw
On Thu, 27 Oct 2022 at 22:32, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.76 release.
> There are 79 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 29 Oct 2022 16:50:35 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.76-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Results from Linaro's test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
NOTE:
As other reported arm64 allmodconfig builds failed [1].
[1] https://builds.tuxbuild.com/2GjYlZaXK7ZwRlerOgTwH1deWP9/
## Build
* kernel: 5.15.76-rc1
* git: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc
* git branch: linux-5.15.y
* git commit: 5ea1b40eb20832f02b922538e861382e148832e5
* git describe: v5.15.75-80-g5ea1b40eb208
* test details:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.15.y/build/v5.15.75-80-g5ea1b40eb208
## No Test Regressions (compared to v5.15.74-531-g98108584d385)
## No Metric Regressions (compared to v5.15.74-531-g98108584d385)
## No Test Fixes (compared to v5.15.74-531-g98108584d385)
## No Metric Fixes (compared to v5.15.74-531-g98108584d385)
## Test result summary
total: 149983, pass: 126822, fail: 3787, skip: 18858, xfail: 516
## Build Summary
* arc: 5 total, 5 passed, 0 failed
* arm: 140 total, 139 passed, 1 failed
* arm64: 46 total, 44 passed, 2 failed
* i386: 36 total, 34 passed, 2 failed
* mips: 26 total, 26 passed, 0 failed
* parisc: 6 total, 6 passed, 0 failed
* powerpc: 30 total, 30 passed, 0 failed
* riscv: 9 total, 9 passed, 0 failed
* s390: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed
* sh: 12 total, 12 passed, 0 failed
* sparc: 5 total, 5 passed, 0 failed
* x86_64: 38 total, 36 passed, 2 failed
## Test suites summary
* fwts
* igt-gpu-tools
* kselftest-android
* kselftest-arm64
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_c_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_j_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_jc_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_none_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.nohint_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.paciasp_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_c_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_j_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_jc_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_none_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.nohint_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.paciasp_func
* kselftest-breakpoints
* kselftest-capabilities
* kselftest-cgroup
* kselftest-clone3
* kselftest-core
* kselftest-cpu-hotplug
* kselftest-cpufreq
* kselftest-drivers-dma-buf
* kselftest-efivarfs
* kselftest-filesystems
* kselftest-filesystems-binderfs
* kselftest-firmware
* kselftest-fpu
* kselftest-futex
* kselftest-gpio
* kselftest-intel_pstate
* kselftest-ipc
* kselftest-ir
* kselftest-kcmp
* kselftest-kexec
* kselftest-kvm
* kselftest-lib
* kselftest-livepatch
* kselftest-membarrier
* kselftest-memfd
* kselftest-memory-hotplug
* kselftest-mincore
* kselftest-mount
* kselftest-mqueue
* kselftest-net
* kselftest-net-forwarding
* kselftest-net-mptcp
* kselftest-netfilter
* kselftest-nsfs
* kselftest-openat2
* kselftest-pid_namespace
* kselftest-pidfd
* kselftest-proc
* kselftest-pstore
* kselftest-ptrace
* kselftest-rseq
* kselftest-rtc
* kselftest-seccomp
* kselftest-sigaltstack
* kselftest-size
* kselftest-splice
* kselftest-static_keys
* kselftest-sync
* kselftest-sysctl
* kselftest-tc-testing
* kselftest-timens
* kselftest-timers
* kselftest-tmpfs
* kselftest-tpm2
* kselftest-user
* kselftest-vm
* kselftest-x86
* kselftest-zram
* kunit
* kvm-unit-tests
* libgpiod
* libhugetlbfs
* log-parser-boot
* log-parser-test
* ltp-cap_bounds
* ltp-commands
* ltp-containers
* ltp-controllers
* ltp-cpuhotplug
* ltp-crypto
* ltp-cve
* ltp-dio
* ltp-fcntl-locktests
* ltp-filecaps
* ltp-fs
* ltp-fs_bind
* ltp-fs_perms_simple
* ltp-fsx
* ltp-hugetlb
* ltp-io
* ltp-ipc
* ltp-math
* ltp-mm
* ltp-nptl
* ltp-open-posix-tests
* ltp-pty
* ltp-sched
* ltp-securebits
* ltp-smoke
* ltp-syscalls
* ltp-tracing
* network-basic-tests
* packetdrill
* perf
* perf/Zstd-perf.data-compression
* rcutorture
* v4l2-compliance
* vdso
--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.15 00/79] 5.15.76-rc1 review
2022-10-27 16:54 [PATCH 5.15 00/79] 5.15.76-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2022-10-28 9:58 ` Naresh Kamboju
@ 2022-10-28 10:40 ` Sudip Mukherjee (Codethink)
2022-10-28 10:44 ` Sudip Mukherjee
2022-10-28 11:58 ` Jon Hunter
5 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Sudip Mukherjee (Codethink) @ 2022-10-28 10:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, srw
Hi Greg,
On Thu, Oct 27, 2022 at 06:54:58PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.76 release.
> There are 79 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 29 Oct 2022 16:50:35 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
Build test (gcc version 12.2.1 20221016):
mips: 62 configs -> no failure
arm: 99 configs -> no failure
arm64: 3 configs -> 1 failure
x86_64: 4 configs -> no failure
alpha allmodconfig -> no failure
csky allmodconfig -> no failure
powerpc allmodconfig -> no failure
riscv allmodconfig -> no failure
s390 allmodconfig -> no failure
xtensa allmodconfig -> no failure
Note:
1) arm64 allmodconfig fails with the error:
In file included from drivers/cpufreq/tegra194-cpufreq.c:10:
drivers/cpufreq/tegra194-cpufreq.c:282:25: error: 'tegra194_cpufreq_of_match' undeclared here (not in a function); did you mean 'tegra194_cpufreq_data'?
282 | MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, tegra194_cpufreq_of_match);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
./include/linux/module.h:244:15: note: in definition of macro 'MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE'
244 | extern typeof(name) __mod_##type##__##name##_device_table \
| ^~~~
./include/linux/module.h:244:21: error: conflicting types for '__mod_of__tegra194_cpufreq_of_match_device_table'; have 'const struct of_device_id[2]'
244 | extern typeof(name) __mod_##type##__##name##_device_table \
| ^~~~~~
drivers/cpufreq/tegra194-cpufreq.c:417:1: note: in expansion of macro 'MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE'
417 | MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, tegra194_cpufreq_of_match);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
./include/linux/module.h:244:21: note: previous declaration of '__mod_of__tegra194_cpufreq_of_match_device_table' with type 'int'
244 | extern typeof(name) __mod_##type##__##name##_device_table \
| ^~~~~~
drivers/cpufreq/tegra194-cpufreq.c:282:1: note: in expansion of macro 'MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE'
282 | MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, tegra194_cpufreq_of_match);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Same error as v5.10.y, should be for b281adc68db8 ("cpufreq: tegra194: Fix module loading").
2) Already reported by others:
/bin/sh: 1: ./scripts/pahole-flags.sh: Permission denied
Boot test:
x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression.
x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1]
arm64: Booted on rpi4b (4GB model). No regression. [2]
[1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/2051
[2]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/2054
Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip.mukherjee@codethink.co.uk>
--
Regards
Sudip
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 5.15 00/79] 5.15.76-rc1 review
2022-10-28 10:40 ` Sudip Mukherjee (Codethink)
@ 2022-10-28 10:44 ` Sudip Mukherjee
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Sudip Mukherjee @ 2022-10-28 10:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: stable, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah,
patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, srw
On Fri, Oct 28, 2022 at 11:40 AM Sudip Mukherjee (Codethink)
<sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Greg,
>
> On Thu, Oct 27, 2022 at 06:54:58PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.76 release.
> > There are 79 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
<snip>
>
>
> 2) Already reported by others:
> /bin/sh: 1: ./scripts/pahole-flags.sh: Permission denied
Ignore the "pahole-flags.sh: Permission denied" please, its only in 5.10.y
--
Regards
Sudip
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 5.15 00/79] 5.15.76-rc1 review
2022-10-27 16:54 [PATCH 5.15 00/79] 5.15.76-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2022-10-28 10:40 ` Sudip Mukherjee (Codethink)
@ 2022-10-28 11:58 ` Jon Hunter
5 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Jon Hunter @ 2022-10-28 11:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman, patches, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux,
shuah, patches, lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli,
sudipm.mukherjee, srw, linux-tegra
On Thu, 27 Oct 2022 18:54:58 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.76 release.
> There are 79 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Sat, 29 Oct 2022 16:50:35 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.76-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
All tests passing for Tegra ...
Test results for stable-v5.15:
11 builds: 11 pass, 0 fail
28 boots: 28 pass, 0 fail
114 tests: 114 pass, 0 fail
Linux version: 5.15.76-rc1-g5ea1b40eb208
Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000,
tegra194-p2972-0000, tegra194-p3509-0000+p3668-0000,
tegra20-ventana, tegra210-p2371-2180,
tegra210-p3450-0000, tegra30-cardhu-a04
Tested-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
Jon
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread