From: Tirthendu Sarkar <tirthendu.sarkar@intel.com>
To: tirtha@gmail.com, jesse.brandeburg@intel.com,
anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com, davem@davemloft.net,
edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com,
ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, hawk@kernel.org,
john.fastabend@gmail.com, intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, magnus.karlsson@intel.com,
maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com
Subject: [PATCH intel-next 2/5] i40e: avoid per buffer next_to_clean access from i40e_ring
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2022 16:20:20 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221213105023.196409-3-tirthendu.sarkar@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221213105023.196409-1-tirthendu.sarkar@intel.com>
Change read/write of next_to_clean from per buffer to beginning and end
of i40_clean_rx_irq(). Use local variables for per buffer increments.
Move out default reading of buffer from 'next_to_clean' in
i40e_get_rx_buffer() and use caller provided index instead. This will
enable walking through all buffers of a multi-buffer packet.
Signed-off-by: Tirthendu Sarkar <tirthendu.sarkar@intel.com>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_txrx.c | 33 ++++++++-------------
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_txrx.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_txrx.c
index a7fba294a8f4..c6296cf08294 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_txrx.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_txrx.c
@@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
#include "i40e_xsk.h"
#define I40E_TXD_CMD (I40E_TX_DESC_CMD_EOP | I40E_TX_DESC_CMD_RS)
+#define I40E_IDX_NEXT(n, max) { if (++(n) > (max)) n = 0; }
/**
* i40e_fdir - Generate a Flow Director descriptor based on fdata
* @tx_ring: Tx ring to send buffer on
@@ -2056,16 +2057,18 @@ static void i40e_add_rx_frag(struct i40e_ring *rx_ring,
* i40e_get_rx_buffer - Fetch Rx buffer and synchronize data for use
* @rx_ring: rx descriptor ring to transact packets on
* @size: size of buffer to add to skb
+ * @next: index of the buffer to be fetched
*
* This function will pull an Rx buffer from the ring and synchronize it
* for use by the CPU.
*/
static struct i40e_rx_buffer *i40e_get_rx_buffer(struct i40e_ring *rx_ring,
- const unsigned int size)
+ const unsigned int size,
+ u32 next)
{
struct i40e_rx_buffer *rx_buffer;
- rx_buffer = i40e_rx_bi(rx_ring, rx_ring->next_to_clean);
+ rx_buffer = i40e_rx_bi(rx_ring, next);
rx_buffer->page_count =
#if (PAGE_SIZE < 8192)
page_count(rx_buffer->page);
@@ -2402,19 +2405,6 @@ void i40e_finalize_xdp_rx(struct i40e_ring *rx_ring, unsigned int xdp_res)
}
}
-/**
- * i40e_inc_ntc: Advance the next_to_clean index
- * @rx_ring: Rx ring
- **/
-static void i40e_inc_ntc(struct i40e_ring *rx_ring)
-{
- u32 ntc = rx_ring->next_to_clean + 1;
-
- ntc = (ntc < rx_ring->count) ? ntc : 0;
- rx_ring->next_to_clean = ntc;
- prefetch(I40E_RX_DESC(rx_ring, ntc));
-}
-
/**
* i40e_clean_rx_irq - Clean completed descriptors from Rx ring - bounce buf
* @rx_ring: rx descriptor ring to transact packets on
@@ -2435,6 +2425,8 @@ static int i40e_clean_rx_irq(struct i40e_ring *rx_ring, int budget,
u16 cleaned_count = I40E_DESC_UNUSED(rx_ring);
unsigned int offset = rx_ring->rx_offset;
struct sk_buff *skb = rx_ring->skb;
+ u16 ntc = rx_ring->next_to_clean;
+ u16 rmax = rx_ring->count - 1;
unsigned int xdp_xmit = 0;
struct bpf_prog *xdp_prog;
bool failure = false;
@@ -2461,7 +2453,7 @@ static int i40e_clean_rx_irq(struct i40e_ring *rx_ring, int budget,
cleaned_count = 0;
}
- rx_desc = I40E_RX_DESC(rx_ring, rx_ring->next_to_clean);
+ rx_desc = I40E_RX_DESC(rx_ring, ntc);
/* status_error_len will always be zero for unused descriptors
* because it's cleared in cleanup, and overlaps with hdr_addr
@@ -2480,8 +2472,8 @@ static int i40e_clean_rx_irq(struct i40e_ring *rx_ring, int budget,
i40e_clean_programming_status(rx_ring,
rx_desc->raw.qword[0],
qword);
- rx_buffer = i40e_rx_bi(rx_ring, rx_ring->next_to_clean);
- i40e_inc_ntc(rx_ring);
+ rx_buffer = i40e_rx_bi(rx_ring, ntc);
+ I40E_IDX_NEXT(ntc, rmax);
i40e_reuse_rx_page(rx_ring, rx_buffer);
cleaned_count++;
continue;
@@ -2493,7 +2485,7 @@ static int i40e_clean_rx_irq(struct i40e_ring *rx_ring, int budget,
break;
i40e_trace(clean_rx_irq, rx_ring, rx_desc, skb);
- rx_buffer = i40e_get_rx_buffer(rx_ring, size);
+ rx_buffer = i40e_get_rx_buffer(rx_ring, size, ntc);
/* retrieve a buffer from the ring */
if (!skb) {
@@ -2537,7 +2529,7 @@ static int i40e_clean_rx_irq(struct i40e_ring *rx_ring, int budget,
i40e_put_rx_buffer(rx_ring, rx_buffer);
cleaned_count++;
- i40e_inc_ntc(rx_ring);
+ I40E_IDX_NEXT(ntc, rmax);
if (i40e_is_non_eop(rx_ring, rx_desc))
continue;
@@ -2559,6 +2551,7 @@ static int i40e_clean_rx_irq(struct i40e_ring *rx_ring, int budget,
/* update budget accounting */
total_rx_packets++;
}
+ rx_ring->next_to_clean = ntc;
i40e_finalize_xdp_rx(rx_ring, xdp_xmit);
rx_ring->skb = skb;
--
2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-12-13 11:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-12-13 10:50 [PATCH intel-next 0/5] i40e: support XDP multi-buffer Tirthendu Sarkar
2022-12-13 10:50 ` [PATCH intel-next 1/5] i40e: add pre-xdp page_count in rx_buffer Tirthendu Sarkar
2022-12-13 10:50 ` Tirthendu Sarkar [this message]
2022-12-13 10:50 ` [PATCH intel-next 3/5] i40e: introduce next_to_process to i40e_ring Tirthendu Sarkar
2022-12-13 10:50 ` [PATCH intel-next 4/5] i40e: pull out rx buffer allocation to end of i40e_clean_rx_irq() Tirthendu Sarkar
2022-12-13 16:09 ` Alexander H Duyck
2022-12-13 10:50 ` [PATCH intel-next 5/5] i40e: add support for XDP multi-buffer Rx Tirthendu Sarkar
2022-12-13 13:14 ` kernel test robot
2022-12-13 15:58 ` [PATCH intel-next 0/5] i40e: support XDP multi-buffer Alexander H Duyck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20221213105023.196409-3-tirthendu.sarkar@intel.com \
--to=tirthendu.sarkar@intel.com \
--cc=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=hawk@kernel.org \
--cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
--cc=jesse.brandeburg@intel.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com \
--cc=magnus.karlsson@intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=tirtha@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox