From: Tirthendu Sarkar <tirthendu.sarkar@intel.com>
To: tirtha@gmail.com, jesse.brandeburg@intel.com,
anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com, davem@davemloft.net,
edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com,
ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, hawk@kernel.org,
john.fastabend@gmail.com, intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, magnus.karlsson@intel.com,
maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com
Subject: [PATCH intel-next 3/5] i40e: introduce next_to_process to i40e_ring
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2022 16:20:21 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221213105023.196409-4-tirthendu.sarkar@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221213105023.196409-1-tirthendu.sarkar@intel.com>
Add a new field called next_to_process in the i40e_ring that is
advanced for every buffer and change the semantics of next_to_clean to
point to the first buffer of a packet. Driver will use next_to_process
in the same way next_to_clean was used previously.
For the non multi-buffer case, next_to_process and next_to_clean will
always be the same since each packet consists of a single buffer.
Signed-off-by: Tirthendu Sarkar <tirthendu.sarkar@intel.com>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_txrx.c | 15 ++++++++++-----
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_txrx.h | 4 ++++
2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_txrx.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_txrx.c
index c6296cf08294..e01bcc91a196 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_txrx.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_txrx.c
@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
#define I40E_TXD_CMD (I40E_TX_DESC_CMD_EOP | I40E_TX_DESC_CMD_RS)
#define I40E_IDX_NEXT(n, max) { if (++(n) > (max)) n = 0; }
+#define I40E_INC_NEXT(p, c, max) do { I40E_IDX_NEXT(p, max); c = p; } while (0)
/**
* i40e_fdir - Generate a Flow Director descriptor based on fdata
* @tx_ring: Tx ring to send buffer on
@@ -1526,6 +1527,7 @@ void i40e_clean_rx_ring(struct i40e_ring *rx_ring)
rx_ring->next_to_alloc = 0;
rx_ring->next_to_clean = 0;
rx_ring->next_to_use = 0;
+ rx_ring->next_to_process = 0;
}
/**
@@ -1576,6 +1578,7 @@ int i40e_setup_rx_descriptors(struct i40e_ring *rx_ring)
}
rx_ring->next_to_alloc = 0;
+ rx_ring->next_to_process = 0;
rx_ring->next_to_clean = 0;
rx_ring->next_to_use = 0;
@@ -2425,6 +2428,7 @@ static int i40e_clean_rx_irq(struct i40e_ring *rx_ring, int budget,
u16 cleaned_count = I40E_DESC_UNUSED(rx_ring);
unsigned int offset = rx_ring->rx_offset;
struct sk_buff *skb = rx_ring->skb;
+ u16 ntp = rx_ring->next_to_process;
u16 ntc = rx_ring->next_to_clean;
u16 rmax = rx_ring->count - 1;
unsigned int xdp_xmit = 0;
@@ -2453,7 +2457,7 @@ static int i40e_clean_rx_irq(struct i40e_ring *rx_ring, int budget,
cleaned_count = 0;
}
- rx_desc = I40E_RX_DESC(rx_ring, ntc);
+ rx_desc = I40E_RX_DESC(rx_ring, ntp);
/* status_error_len will always be zero for unused descriptors
* because it's cleared in cleanup, and overlaps with hdr_addr
@@ -2472,8 +2476,8 @@ static int i40e_clean_rx_irq(struct i40e_ring *rx_ring, int budget,
i40e_clean_programming_status(rx_ring,
rx_desc->raw.qword[0],
qword);
- rx_buffer = i40e_rx_bi(rx_ring, ntc);
- I40E_IDX_NEXT(ntc, rmax);
+ rx_buffer = i40e_rx_bi(rx_ring, ntp);
+ I40E_INC_NEXT(ntp, ntc, rmax);
i40e_reuse_rx_page(rx_ring, rx_buffer);
cleaned_count++;
continue;
@@ -2485,7 +2489,7 @@ static int i40e_clean_rx_irq(struct i40e_ring *rx_ring, int budget,
break;
i40e_trace(clean_rx_irq, rx_ring, rx_desc, skb);
- rx_buffer = i40e_get_rx_buffer(rx_ring, size, ntc);
+ rx_buffer = i40e_get_rx_buffer(rx_ring, size, ntp);
/* retrieve a buffer from the ring */
if (!skb) {
@@ -2529,7 +2533,7 @@ static int i40e_clean_rx_irq(struct i40e_ring *rx_ring, int budget,
i40e_put_rx_buffer(rx_ring, rx_buffer);
cleaned_count++;
- I40E_IDX_NEXT(ntc, rmax);
+ I40E_INC_NEXT(ntp, ntc, rmax);
if (i40e_is_non_eop(rx_ring, rx_desc))
continue;
@@ -2551,6 +2555,7 @@ static int i40e_clean_rx_irq(struct i40e_ring *rx_ring, int budget,
/* update budget accounting */
total_rx_packets++;
}
+ rx_ring->next_to_process = ntp;
rx_ring->next_to_clean = ntc;
i40e_finalize_xdp_rx(rx_ring, xdp_xmit);
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_txrx.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_txrx.h
index eec4a4a99b9c..c1b5013f5c9c 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_txrx.h
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_txrx.h
@@ -337,6 +337,10 @@ struct i40e_ring {
u8 dcb_tc; /* Traffic class of ring */
u8 __iomem *tail;
+ u16 next_to_process; /* Next descriptor to be processed; for MB packet
+ * next_to_clean will be updated only after all
+ * buffers have been processed.
+ */
/* high bit set means dynamic, use accessor routines to read/write.
* hardware only supports 2us resolution for the ITR registers.
* these values always store the USER setting, and must be converted
--
2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-12-13 11:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-12-13 10:50 [PATCH intel-next 0/5] i40e: support XDP multi-buffer Tirthendu Sarkar
2022-12-13 10:50 ` [PATCH intel-next 1/5] i40e: add pre-xdp page_count in rx_buffer Tirthendu Sarkar
2022-12-13 10:50 ` [PATCH intel-next 2/5] i40e: avoid per buffer next_to_clean access from i40e_ring Tirthendu Sarkar
2022-12-13 10:50 ` Tirthendu Sarkar [this message]
2022-12-13 10:50 ` [PATCH intel-next 4/5] i40e: pull out rx buffer allocation to end of i40e_clean_rx_irq() Tirthendu Sarkar
2022-12-13 16:09 ` Alexander H Duyck
2022-12-13 10:50 ` [PATCH intel-next 5/5] i40e: add support for XDP multi-buffer Rx Tirthendu Sarkar
2022-12-13 13:14 ` kernel test robot
2022-12-13 15:58 ` [PATCH intel-next 0/5] i40e: support XDP multi-buffer Alexander H Duyck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20221213105023.196409-4-tirthendu.sarkar@intel.com \
--to=tirthendu.sarkar@intel.com \
--cc=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=hawk@kernel.org \
--cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
--cc=jesse.brandeburg@intel.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com \
--cc=magnus.karlsson@intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=tirtha@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox