From: Tirthendu Sarkar <tirthendu.sarkar@intel.com>
To: tirtha@gmail.com, jesse.brandeburg@intel.com,
anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com, davem@davemloft.net,
edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com,
ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, hawk@kernel.org,
john.fastabend@gmail.com, intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, magnus.karlsson@intel.com,
maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com
Subject: [PATCH intel-next 4/5] i40e: pull out rx buffer allocation to end of i40e_clean_rx_irq()
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2022 16:20:22 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221213105023.196409-5-tirthendu.sarkar@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221213105023.196409-1-tirthendu.sarkar@intel.com>
Previously i40e_alloc_rx_buffers() was called for every 32 cleaned
buffers. For multi-buffers this may not be optimal as there may be more
cleaned buffers in each i40e_clean_rx_irq() call. So this is now pulled
out of the loop and moved to the end of i40e_clean_rx_irq().
As a consequence instead of counting the number of buffers to be cleaned,
I40E_DESC_UNUSED() can be used to call i40e_alloc_rx_buffers().
Signed-off-by: Tirthendu Sarkar <tirthendu.sarkar@intel.com>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_txrx.c | 12 ++----------
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_txrx.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_txrx.c
index e01bcc91a196..dc9dc0acdd37 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_txrx.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_txrx.c
@@ -2425,7 +2425,6 @@ static int i40e_clean_rx_irq(struct i40e_ring *rx_ring, int budget,
unsigned int *rx_cleaned)
{
unsigned int total_rx_bytes = 0, total_rx_packets = 0, frame_sz = 0;
- u16 cleaned_count = I40E_DESC_UNUSED(rx_ring);
unsigned int offset = rx_ring->rx_offset;
struct sk_buff *skb = rx_ring->skb;
u16 ntp = rx_ring->next_to_process;
@@ -2450,13 +2449,6 @@ static int i40e_clean_rx_irq(struct i40e_ring *rx_ring, int budget,
unsigned int size;
u64 qword;
- /* return some buffers to hardware, one at a time is too slow */
- if (cleaned_count >= I40E_RX_BUFFER_WRITE) {
- failure = failure ||
- i40e_alloc_rx_buffers(rx_ring, cleaned_count);
- cleaned_count = 0;
- }
-
rx_desc = I40E_RX_DESC(rx_ring, ntp);
/* status_error_len will always be zero for unused descriptors
@@ -2479,7 +2471,6 @@ static int i40e_clean_rx_irq(struct i40e_ring *rx_ring, int budget,
rx_buffer = i40e_rx_bi(rx_ring, ntp);
I40E_INC_NEXT(ntp, ntc, rmax);
i40e_reuse_rx_page(rx_ring, rx_buffer);
- cleaned_count++;
continue;
}
@@ -2531,7 +2522,6 @@ static int i40e_clean_rx_irq(struct i40e_ring *rx_ring, int budget,
}
i40e_put_rx_buffer(rx_ring, rx_buffer);
- cleaned_count++;
I40E_INC_NEXT(ntp, ntc, rmax);
if (i40e_is_non_eop(rx_ring, rx_desc))
@@ -2558,6 +2548,8 @@ static int i40e_clean_rx_irq(struct i40e_ring *rx_ring, int budget,
rx_ring->next_to_process = ntp;
rx_ring->next_to_clean = ntc;
+ failure = i40e_alloc_rx_buffers(rx_ring, I40E_DESC_UNUSED(rx_ring));
+
i40e_finalize_xdp_rx(rx_ring, xdp_xmit);
rx_ring->skb = skb;
--
2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-12-13 11:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-12-13 10:50 [PATCH intel-next 0/5] i40e: support XDP multi-buffer Tirthendu Sarkar
2022-12-13 10:50 ` [PATCH intel-next 1/5] i40e: add pre-xdp page_count in rx_buffer Tirthendu Sarkar
2022-12-13 10:50 ` [PATCH intel-next 2/5] i40e: avoid per buffer next_to_clean access from i40e_ring Tirthendu Sarkar
2022-12-13 10:50 ` [PATCH intel-next 3/5] i40e: introduce next_to_process to i40e_ring Tirthendu Sarkar
2022-12-13 10:50 ` Tirthendu Sarkar [this message]
2022-12-13 16:09 ` [PATCH intel-next 4/5] i40e: pull out rx buffer allocation to end of i40e_clean_rx_irq() Alexander H Duyck
2022-12-13 10:50 ` [PATCH intel-next 5/5] i40e: add support for XDP multi-buffer Rx Tirthendu Sarkar
2022-12-13 13:14 ` kernel test robot
2022-12-13 15:58 ` [PATCH intel-next 0/5] i40e: support XDP multi-buffer Alexander H Duyck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20221213105023.196409-5-tirthendu.sarkar@intel.com \
--to=tirthendu.sarkar@intel.com \
--cc=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=hawk@kernel.org \
--cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
--cc=jesse.brandeburg@intel.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com \
--cc=magnus.karlsson@intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=tirtha@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox