* [PATCH 2/4] hwspinlock: omap: Use devm_pm_runtime_enable() helper
2024-01-23 16:04 [PATCH 1/4] hwspinlock: omap: Remove unneeded check for OF node Andrew Davis
@ 2024-01-23 16:04 ` Andrew Davis
2024-02-06 19:06 ` Bjorn Andersson
2024-01-23 16:04 ` [PATCH 3/4] hwspinlock: omap: Use devm_hwspin_lock_register() helper Andrew Davis
2024-01-23 16:04 ` [PATCH 4/4] hwspinlock: omap: Use index to get hwspinlock pointer Andrew Davis
2 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Davis @ 2024-01-23 16:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Bjorn Andersson, Baolin Wang
Cc: linux-omap, linux-remoteproc, linux-kernel, Andrew Davis
This disables runtime PM on module exit, allowing us to simplify
the probe exit path and remove callbacks. Do that here.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Davis <afd@ti.com>
---
drivers/hwspinlock/omap_hwspinlock.c | 26 ++++++++------------------
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/hwspinlock/omap_hwspinlock.c b/drivers/hwspinlock/omap_hwspinlock.c
index cca55143d24d4..2f18ea6c05e3f 100644
--- a/drivers/hwspinlock/omap_hwspinlock.c
+++ b/drivers/hwspinlock/omap_hwspinlock.c
@@ -89,10 +89,10 @@ static int omap_hwspinlock_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
* make sure the module is enabled and clocked before reading
* the module SYSSTATUS register
*/
- pm_runtime_enable(&pdev->dev);
+ devm_pm_runtime_enable(&pdev->dev);
ret = pm_runtime_resume_and_get(&pdev->dev);
if (ret < 0)
- goto runtime_err;
+ return ret;
/* Determine number of locks */
i = readl(io_base + SYSSTATUS_OFFSET);
@@ -104,22 +104,18 @@ static int omap_hwspinlock_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
*/
ret = pm_runtime_put(&pdev->dev);
if (ret < 0)
- goto runtime_err;
+ return ret;
/* one of the four lsb's must be set, and nothing else */
- if (hweight_long(i & 0xf) != 1 || i > 8) {
- ret = -EINVAL;
- goto runtime_err;
- }
+ if (hweight_long(i & 0xf) != 1 || i > 8)
+ return -EINVAL;
num_locks = i * 32; /* actual number of locks in this device */
bank = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, struct_size(bank, lock, num_locks),
GFP_KERNEL);
- if (!bank) {
- ret = -ENOMEM;
- goto runtime_err;
- }
+ if (!bank)
+ return -ENOMEM;
platform_set_drvdata(pdev, bank);
@@ -129,16 +125,12 @@ static int omap_hwspinlock_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
ret = hwspin_lock_register(bank, &pdev->dev, &omap_hwspinlock_ops,
base_id, num_locks);
if (ret)
- goto runtime_err;
+ return ret;
dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "Registered %d locks with HwSpinlock core\n",
num_locks);
return 0;
-
-runtime_err:
- pm_runtime_disable(&pdev->dev);
- return ret;
}
static void omap_hwspinlock_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
@@ -151,8 +143,6 @@ static void omap_hwspinlock_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
dev_err(&pdev->dev, "%s failed: %d\n", __func__, ret);
return;
}
-
- pm_runtime_disable(&pdev->dev);
}
static const struct of_device_id omap_hwspinlock_of_match[] = {
--
2.39.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 2/4] hwspinlock: omap: Use devm_pm_runtime_enable() helper
2024-01-23 16:04 ` [PATCH 2/4] hwspinlock: omap: Use devm_pm_runtime_enable() helper Andrew Davis
@ 2024-02-06 19:06 ` Bjorn Andersson
2024-02-06 19:07 ` Andrew Davis
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Bjorn Andersson @ 2024-02-06 19:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Davis; +Cc: Baolin Wang, linux-omap, linux-remoteproc, linux-kernel
On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 10:04:03AM -0600, Andrew Davis wrote:
> This disables runtime PM on module exit, allowing us to simplify
> the probe exit path and remove callbacks. Do that here.
As with the later patch, unless I'm misreading the code, you already do
disable runtime PM in omap_hwspinlock_remove().
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Davis <afd@ti.com>
> ---
> drivers/hwspinlock/omap_hwspinlock.c | 26 ++++++++------------------
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/hwspinlock/omap_hwspinlock.c b/drivers/hwspinlock/omap_hwspinlock.c
[..]
> @@ -129,16 +125,12 @@ static int omap_hwspinlock_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> ret = hwspin_lock_register(bank, &pdev->dev, &omap_hwspinlock_ops,
> base_id, num_locks);
> if (ret)
> - goto runtime_err;
> + return ret;
>
> dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "Registered %d locks with HwSpinlock core\n",
> num_locks);
I don't fancy these debug information messages, there are other ways to
confirm that the device probed successfully etc.
Now that you don't need the goto runtime_err, I'd prefer the tail of
this function:
return hwspin_lock_register(...);
Regards,
Bjorn
>
> return 0;
> -
> -runtime_err:
> - pm_runtime_disable(&pdev->dev);
> - return ret;
> }
>
> static void omap_hwspinlock_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> @@ -151,8 +143,6 @@ static void omap_hwspinlock_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "%s failed: %d\n", __func__, ret);
> return;
> }
> -
> - pm_runtime_disable(&pdev->dev);
> }
>
> static const struct of_device_id omap_hwspinlock_of_match[] = {
> --
> 2.39.2
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 2/4] hwspinlock: omap: Use devm_pm_runtime_enable() helper
2024-02-06 19:06 ` Bjorn Andersson
@ 2024-02-06 19:07 ` Andrew Davis
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Davis @ 2024-02-06 19:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Bjorn Andersson; +Cc: Baolin Wang, linux-omap, linux-remoteproc, linux-kernel
On 2/6/24 1:06 PM, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 10:04:03AM -0600, Andrew Davis wrote:
>> This disables runtime PM on module exit, allowing us to simplify
>> the probe exit path and remove callbacks. Do that here.
>
> As with the later patch, unless I'm misreading the code, you already do
> disable runtime PM in omap_hwspinlock_remove().
>
Right, what I meant to say in the commit message was
"This disables runtime PM on module exit *automatically for us*.."
As in we don't have to manually do it anymore, and that simplifies
the code, which is the "fix" that this patch does.
Will update the commit message to make that more clear in this
and the next patch.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Andrew Davis <afd@ti.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/hwspinlock/omap_hwspinlock.c | 26 ++++++++------------------
>> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/hwspinlock/omap_hwspinlock.c b/drivers/hwspinlock/omap_hwspinlock.c
> [..]
>> @@ -129,16 +125,12 @@ static int omap_hwspinlock_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> ret = hwspin_lock_register(bank, &pdev->dev, &omap_hwspinlock_ops,
>> base_id, num_locks);
>> if (ret)
>> - goto runtime_err;
>> + return ret;
>>
>> dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "Registered %d locks with HwSpinlock core\n",
>> num_locks);
>
> I don't fancy these debug information messages, there are other ways to
> confirm that the device probed successfully etc.
>
> Now that you don't need the goto runtime_err, I'd prefer the tail of
> this function:
>
> return hwspin_lock_register(...);
>
Sure, will update.
Thanks,
Andrew
> Regards,
> Bjorn
>
>>
>> return 0;
>> -
>> -runtime_err:
>> - pm_runtime_disable(&pdev->dev);
>> - return ret;
>> }
>>
>> static void omap_hwspinlock_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> @@ -151,8 +143,6 @@ static void omap_hwspinlock_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "%s failed: %d\n", __func__, ret);
>> return;
>> }
>> -
>> - pm_runtime_disable(&pdev->dev);
>> }
>>
>> static const struct of_device_id omap_hwspinlock_of_match[] = {
>> --
>> 2.39.2
>>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 3/4] hwspinlock: omap: Use devm_hwspin_lock_register() helper
2024-01-23 16:04 [PATCH 1/4] hwspinlock: omap: Remove unneeded check for OF node Andrew Davis
2024-01-23 16:04 ` [PATCH 2/4] hwspinlock: omap: Use devm_pm_runtime_enable() helper Andrew Davis
@ 2024-01-23 16:04 ` Andrew Davis
2024-02-06 19:02 ` Bjorn Andersson
2024-01-23 16:04 ` [PATCH 4/4] hwspinlock: omap: Use index to get hwspinlock pointer Andrew Davis
2 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Davis @ 2024-01-23 16:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Bjorn Andersson, Baolin Wang
Cc: linux-omap, linux-remoteproc, linux-kernel, Andrew Davis
This unregister the HW spinlock on module exit, allowing us to
remove the remove callback. Do this here.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Davis <afd@ti.com>
---
drivers/hwspinlock/omap_hwspinlock.c | 17 +----------------
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/hwspinlock/omap_hwspinlock.c b/drivers/hwspinlock/omap_hwspinlock.c
index 2f18ea6c05e3f..1b0a1bea2b24a 100644
--- a/drivers/hwspinlock/omap_hwspinlock.c
+++ b/drivers/hwspinlock/omap_hwspinlock.c
@@ -117,12 +117,10 @@ static int omap_hwspinlock_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
if (!bank)
return -ENOMEM;
- platform_set_drvdata(pdev, bank);
-
for (i = 0, hwlock = &bank->lock[0]; i < num_locks; i++, hwlock++)
hwlock->priv = io_base + LOCK_BASE_OFFSET + sizeof(u32) * i;
- ret = hwspin_lock_register(bank, &pdev->dev, &omap_hwspinlock_ops,
+ ret = devm_hwspin_lock_register(&pdev->dev, bank, &omap_hwspinlock_ops,
base_id, num_locks);
if (ret)
return ret;
@@ -133,18 +131,6 @@ static int omap_hwspinlock_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
return 0;
}
-static void omap_hwspinlock_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
-{
- struct hwspinlock_device *bank = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
- int ret;
-
- ret = hwspin_lock_unregister(bank);
- if (ret) {
- dev_err(&pdev->dev, "%s failed: %d\n", __func__, ret);
- return;
- }
-}
-
static const struct of_device_id omap_hwspinlock_of_match[] = {
{ .compatible = "ti,omap4-hwspinlock", },
{ .compatible = "ti,am64-hwspinlock", },
@@ -155,7 +141,6 @@ MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, omap_hwspinlock_of_match);
static struct platform_driver omap_hwspinlock_driver = {
.probe = omap_hwspinlock_probe,
- .remove_new = omap_hwspinlock_remove,
.driver = {
.name = "omap_hwspinlock",
.of_match_table = omap_hwspinlock_of_match,
--
2.39.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 3/4] hwspinlock: omap: Use devm_hwspin_lock_register() helper
2024-01-23 16:04 ` [PATCH 3/4] hwspinlock: omap: Use devm_hwspin_lock_register() helper Andrew Davis
@ 2024-02-06 19:02 ` Bjorn Andersson
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Bjorn Andersson @ 2024-02-06 19:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Davis; +Cc: Baolin Wang, linux-omap, linux-remoteproc, linux-kernel
On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 10:04:04AM -0600, Andrew Davis wrote:
> This unregister the HW spinlock on module exit, allowing us to
> remove the remove callback. Do this here.
>
I interpret this as stating that the driver currently doesn't unregister
the spinlocks, but as far as I can see it does, and that the patch has
no functional change.
Can you please rewrite this commit message to clearly express which
"problem" you're solving, and unless I'm mistaken clarify that there's
no functional change.
Patch itself looks good.
Regards,
Bjorn
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Davis <afd@ti.com>
> ---
> drivers/hwspinlock/omap_hwspinlock.c | 17 +----------------
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/hwspinlock/omap_hwspinlock.c b/drivers/hwspinlock/omap_hwspinlock.c
> index 2f18ea6c05e3f..1b0a1bea2b24a 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwspinlock/omap_hwspinlock.c
> +++ b/drivers/hwspinlock/omap_hwspinlock.c
> @@ -117,12 +117,10 @@ static int omap_hwspinlock_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> if (!bank)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> - platform_set_drvdata(pdev, bank);
> -
> for (i = 0, hwlock = &bank->lock[0]; i < num_locks; i++, hwlock++)
> hwlock->priv = io_base + LOCK_BASE_OFFSET + sizeof(u32) * i;
>
> - ret = hwspin_lock_register(bank, &pdev->dev, &omap_hwspinlock_ops,
> + ret = devm_hwspin_lock_register(&pdev->dev, bank, &omap_hwspinlock_ops,
> base_id, num_locks);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
> @@ -133,18 +131,6 @@ static int omap_hwspinlock_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static void omap_hwspinlock_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> -{
> - struct hwspinlock_device *bank = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> - int ret;
> -
> - ret = hwspin_lock_unregister(bank);
> - if (ret) {
> - dev_err(&pdev->dev, "%s failed: %d\n", __func__, ret);
> - return;
> - }
> -}
> -
> static const struct of_device_id omap_hwspinlock_of_match[] = {
> { .compatible = "ti,omap4-hwspinlock", },
> { .compatible = "ti,am64-hwspinlock", },
> @@ -155,7 +141,6 @@ MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, omap_hwspinlock_of_match);
>
> static struct platform_driver omap_hwspinlock_driver = {
> .probe = omap_hwspinlock_probe,
> - .remove_new = omap_hwspinlock_remove,
> .driver = {
> .name = "omap_hwspinlock",
> .of_match_table = omap_hwspinlock_of_match,
> --
> 2.39.2
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 4/4] hwspinlock: omap: Use index to get hwspinlock pointer
2024-01-23 16:04 [PATCH 1/4] hwspinlock: omap: Remove unneeded check for OF node Andrew Davis
2024-01-23 16:04 ` [PATCH 2/4] hwspinlock: omap: Use devm_pm_runtime_enable() helper Andrew Davis
2024-01-23 16:04 ` [PATCH 3/4] hwspinlock: omap: Use devm_hwspin_lock_register() helper Andrew Davis
@ 2024-01-23 16:04 ` Andrew Davis
2 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Davis @ 2024-01-23 16:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Bjorn Andersson, Baolin Wang
Cc: linux-omap, linux-remoteproc, linux-kernel, Andrew Davis
For loops with multiple initializers and increments are hard to read
and reason about, simplify this by using the looping index to index
into the hwspinlock array.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Davis <afd@ti.com>
---
drivers/hwspinlock/omap_hwspinlock.c | 5 ++---
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/hwspinlock/omap_hwspinlock.c b/drivers/hwspinlock/omap_hwspinlock.c
index 1b0a1bea2b24a..a2555c41320d8 100644
--- a/drivers/hwspinlock/omap_hwspinlock.c
+++ b/drivers/hwspinlock/omap_hwspinlock.c
@@ -75,7 +75,6 @@ static const struct hwspinlock_ops omap_hwspinlock_ops = {
static int omap_hwspinlock_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
{
struct hwspinlock_device *bank;
- struct hwspinlock *hwlock;
void __iomem *io_base;
int num_locks, i, ret;
/* Only a single hwspinlock block device is supported */
@@ -117,8 +116,8 @@ static int omap_hwspinlock_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
if (!bank)
return -ENOMEM;
- for (i = 0, hwlock = &bank->lock[0]; i < num_locks; i++, hwlock++)
- hwlock->priv = io_base + LOCK_BASE_OFFSET + sizeof(u32) * i;
+ for (i = 0; i < num_locks; i++)
+ bank->lock[i].priv = io_base + LOCK_BASE_OFFSET + sizeof(u32) * i;
ret = devm_hwspin_lock_register(&pdev->dev, bank, &omap_hwspinlock_ops,
base_id, num_locks);
--
2.39.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread