* [PATCH 2/4] arm64: dts: stratix10: socdk_nand: drop unneeded flash address/size-cells
2024-04-01 14:10 [PATCH 1/4] arm64: dts: stratix10: socdk: drop unneeded flash address/size-cells Krzysztof Kozlowski
@ 2024-04-01 14:10 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-04-01 14:10 ` [PATCH 3/4] arm64: dts: agilex: socdk: " Krzysztof Kozlowski
` (2 subsequent siblings)
3 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski @ 2024-04-01 14:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dinh Nguyen, Rob Herring, Krzysztof Kozlowski, Conor Dooley,
devicetree, linux-kernel
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski
Flash node uses single "partition" node to describe partitions, so
remove deprecated address/size-cells properties to also fix dtc W=1
warnings:
socfpga_stratix10_socdk_nand.dts:171.10-200.4: Warning (avoid_unnecessary_addr_size): /soc@0/spi@ff8d2000/flash@0: unnecessary #address-cells/#size-cells without "ranges" or child "reg" property
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
---
arch/arm64/boot/dts/altera/socfpga_stratix10_socdk_nand.dts | 2 --
1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/altera/socfpga_stratix10_socdk_nand.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/altera/socfpga_stratix10_socdk_nand.dts
index 81d0e914a77c..7c53cb9621e5 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/altera/socfpga_stratix10_socdk_nand.dts
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/altera/socfpga_stratix10_socdk_nand.dts
@@ -169,8 +169,6 @@ rtc@68 {
&qspi {
status = "okay";
flash@0 {
- #address-cells = <1>;
- #size-cells = <1>;
compatible = "micron,mt25qu02g", "jedec,spi-nor";
reg = <0>;
spi-max-frequency = <100000000>;
--
2.34.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* [PATCH 3/4] arm64: dts: agilex: socdk: drop unneeded flash address/size-cells
2024-04-01 14:10 [PATCH 1/4] arm64: dts: stratix10: socdk: drop unneeded flash address/size-cells Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-04-01 14:10 ` [PATCH 2/4] arm64: dts: stratix10: socdk_nand: " Krzysztof Kozlowski
@ 2024-04-01 14:10 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-04-01 14:10 ` [PATCH 4/4] arm64: dts: n5x: " Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-04-05 12:30 ` [PATCH 1/4] arm64: dts: stratix10: " Dinh Nguyen
3 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski @ 2024-04-01 14:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dinh Nguyen, Rob Herring, Krzysztof Kozlowski, Conor Dooley,
devicetree, linux-kernel
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski
Flash node uses single "partition" node to describe partitions, so
remove deprecated address/size-cells properties to also fix dtc W=1
warnings:
socfpga_agilex_socdk.dts:108.10-137.4: Warning (avoid_unnecessary_addr_size): /soc@0/spi@ff8d2000/flash@0: unnecessary #address-cells/#size-cells without "ranges" or child "reg" property
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
---
arch/arm64/boot/dts/intel/socfpga_agilex_socdk.dts | 2 --
1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/intel/socfpga_agilex_socdk.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/intel/socfpga_agilex_socdk.dts
index ad99aefeb185..b31cfa6b802d 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/intel/socfpga_agilex_socdk.dts
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/intel/socfpga_agilex_socdk.dts
@@ -106,8 +106,6 @@ &watchdog0 {
&qspi {
status = "okay";
flash@0 {
- #address-cells = <1>;
- #size-cells = <1>;
compatible = "micron,mt25qu02g", "jedec,spi-nor";
reg = <0>;
spi-max-frequency = <100000000>;
--
2.34.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* [PATCH 4/4] arm64: dts: n5x: socdk: drop unneeded flash address/size-cells
2024-04-01 14:10 [PATCH 1/4] arm64: dts: stratix10: socdk: drop unneeded flash address/size-cells Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-04-01 14:10 ` [PATCH 2/4] arm64: dts: stratix10: socdk_nand: " Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-04-01 14:10 ` [PATCH 3/4] arm64: dts: agilex: socdk: " Krzysztof Kozlowski
@ 2024-04-01 14:10 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-04-05 12:30 ` [PATCH 1/4] arm64: dts: stratix10: " Dinh Nguyen
3 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski @ 2024-04-01 14:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dinh Nguyen, Rob Herring, Krzysztof Kozlowski, Conor Dooley,
devicetree, linux-kernel
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski
Flash node uses single "partition" node to describe partitions, so
remove deprecated address/size-cells properties to also fix dtc W=1
warnings:
socfpga_n5x_socdk.dts:85.10-114.4: Warning (avoid_unnecessary_addr_size): /soc@0/spi@ff8d2000/flash@0: unnecessary #address-cells/#size-cells without "ranges" or child "reg" property
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
---
arch/arm64/boot/dts/intel/socfpga_n5x_socdk.dts | 2 --
1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/intel/socfpga_n5x_socdk.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/intel/socfpga_n5x_socdk.dts
index 2d70a92c2090..7952c7f47cc2 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/intel/socfpga_n5x_socdk.dts
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/intel/socfpga_n5x_socdk.dts
@@ -83,8 +83,6 @@ &osc1 {
&qspi {
status = "okay";
flash@0 {
- #address-cells = <1>;
- #size-cells = <1>;
compatible = "micron,mt25qu02g", "jedec,spi-nor";
reg = <0>;
spi-max-frequency = <100000000>;
--
2.34.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 1/4] arm64: dts: stratix10: socdk: drop unneeded flash address/size-cells
2024-04-01 14:10 [PATCH 1/4] arm64: dts: stratix10: socdk: drop unneeded flash address/size-cells Krzysztof Kozlowski
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2024-04-01 14:10 ` [PATCH 4/4] arm64: dts: n5x: " Krzysztof Kozlowski
@ 2024-04-05 12:30 ` Dinh Nguyen
2024-06-04 10:07 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
3 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Dinh Nguyen @ 2024-04-05 12:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski, Rob Herring, Krzysztof Kozlowski,
Conor Dooley, devicetree, linux-kernel
On 4/1/24 09:10, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> Flash node uses single "partition" node to describe partitions, so
> remove deprecated address/size-cells properties to also fix dtc W=1
> warnings:
>
> socfpga_stratix10_socdk.dts:182.10-211.4: Warning (avoid_unnecessary_addr_size): /soc@0/spi@ff8d2000/flash@0: unnecessary #address-cells/#size-cells without "ranges" or child "reg" property
>
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
> ---
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/altera/socfpga_stratix10_socdk.dts | 2 --
> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/altera/socfpga_stratix10_socdk.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/altera/socfpga_stratix10_socdk.dts
> index 26173f0b0051..4eee777ef1a1 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/altera/socfpga_stratix10_socdk.dts
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/altera/socfpga_stratix10_socdk.dts
> @@ -180,8 +180,6 @@ rtc@68 {
> &qspi {
> status = "okay";
> flash@0 {
> - #address-cells = <1>;
> - #size-cells = <1>;
> compatible = "micron,mt25qu02g", "jedec,spi-nor";
> reg = <0>;
> spi-max-frequency = <100000000>;
All patches applied!
Thanks,
Dinh
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 1/4] arm64: dts: stratix10: socdk: drop unneeded flash address/size-cells
2024-04-05 12:30 ` [PATCH 1/4] arm64: dts: stratix10: " Dinh Nguyen
@ 2024-06-04 10:07 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-06-06 17:49 ` Dinh Nguyen
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski @ 2024-06-04 10:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dinh Nguyen, Krzysztof Kozlowski, Rob Herring,
Krzysztof Kozlowski, Conor Dooley, devicetree, linux-kernel
On 05/04/2024 14:30, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
> On 4/1/24 09:10, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> Flash node uses single "partition" node to describe partitions, so
>> remove deprecated address/size-cells properties to also fix dtc W=1
>> warnings:
>>
>> socfpga_stratix10_socdk.dts:182.10-211.4: Warning (avoid_unnecessary_addr_size): /soc@0/spi@ff8d2000/flash@0: unnecessary #address-cells/#size-cells without "ranges" or child "reg" property
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
>> ---
>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/altera/socfpga_stratix10_socdk.dts | 2 --
>> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/altera/socfpga_stratix10_socdk.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/altera/socfpga_stratix10_socdk.dts
>> index 26173f0b0051..4eee777ef1a1 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/altera/socfpga_stratix10_socdk.dts
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/altera/socfpga_stratix10_socdk.dts
>> @@ -180,8 +180,6 @@ rtc@68 {
>> &qspi {
>> status = "okay";
>> flash@0 {
>> - #address-cells = <1>;
>> - #size-cells = <1>;
>> compatible = "micron,mt25qu02g", "jedec,spi-nor";
>> reg = <0>;
>> spi-max-frequency = <100000000>;
>
> All patches applied!
This was two months ago, so it should reach v6.10-rc1. It is neither in
v6.10-rc1 nor in linux-next.
Are you sure you applied this?
Are your trees in linux-next?
Best regards,
Krzysztof
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 1/4] arm64: dts: stratix10: socdk: drop unneeded flash address/size-cells
2024-06-04 10:07 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
@ 2024-06-06 17:49 ` Dinh Nguyen
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Dinh Nguyen @ 2024-06-06 17:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski, Krzysztof Kozlowski, Rob Herring,
Krzysztof Kozlowski, Conor Dooley, devicetree, linux-kernel
On 6/4/24 05:07, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 05/04/2024 14:30, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
>> On 4/1/24 09:10, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> Flash node uses single "partition" node to describe partitions, so
>>> remove deprecated address/size-cells properties to also fix dtc W=1
>>> warnings:
>>>
>>> socfpga_stratix10_socdk.dts:182.10-211.4: Warning (avoid_unnecessary_addr_size): /soc@0/spi@ff8d2000/flash@0: unnecessary #address-cells/#size-cells without "ranges" or child "reg" property
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
>>> ---
>>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/altera/socfpga_stratix10_socdk.dts | 2 --
>>> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/altera/socfpga_stratix10_socdk.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/altera/socfpga_stratix10_socdk.dts
>>> index 26173f0b0051..4eee777ef1a1 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/altera/socfpga_stratix10_socdk.dts
>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/altera/socfpga_stratix10_socdk.dts
>>> @@ -180,8 +180,6 @@ rtc@68 {
>>> &qspi {
>>> status = "okay";
>>> flash@0 {
>>> - #address-cells = <1>;
>>> - #size-cells = <1>;
>>> compatible = "micron,mt25qu02g", "jedec,spi-nor";
>>> reg = <0>;
>>> spi-max-frequency = <100000000>;
>>
>> All patches applied!
>
> This was two months ago, so it should reach v6.10-rc1. It is neither in
> v6.10-rc1 nor in linux-next.
>
> Are you sure you applied this?
>
> Are your trees in linux-next?
I apologize, I miss the PR for the v6.10. I have it queue for v6.11.
Dinh
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread