From: Zijun Hu <zijun_hu@icloud.com>
To: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
Cc: Zijun Hu <zijun_hu@icloud.com>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Zijun Hu <quic_zijuhu@quicinc.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 4/7] of: Exchange implementation between of_property_present() and of_property_read_bool()
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2024 08:40:43 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241216-of_core_fix-v2-4-e69b8f60da63@quicinc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241216-of_core_fix-v2-0-e69b8f60da63@quicinc.com>
From: Zijun Hu <quic_zijuhu@quicinc.com>
of_property_present() is to check if a property is present or not,
and it should be applicable for all kinds of property, but it calls
of_property_read_bool() to implement the function, so narrows its
property scope to only bool type.
Fix by exchanging implementation, namely, changing call chain from:
of_property_present() -> of_property_read_bool() -> of_find_property()
to :
of_property_read_bool() -> of_property_present() -> of_find_property()
which looks more logical as well.
Signed-off-by: Zijun Hu <quic_zijuhu@quicinc.com>
---
include/linux/of.h | 23 ++++++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/of.h b/include/linux/of.h
index f921786cb8ac782286ed5ff4425a35668204d050..7b0da8d352dffd8b872998903282119b6164a5bc 100644
--- a/include/linux/of.h
+++ b/include/linux/of.h
@@ -1243,17 +1243,16 @@ static inline int of_property_read_string_index(const struct device_node *np,
}
/**
- * of_property_read_bool - Find a property
- * @np: device node from which the property value is to be read.
+ * of_property_present - Test if a property is present in a node
+ * @np: device node to search for the property.
* @propname: name of the property to be searched.
*
- * Search for a boolean property in a device node. Usage on non-boolean
- * property types is deprecated.
+ * Test for a property present in a device node.
*
* Return: true if the property exists false otherwise.
*/
-static inline bool of_property_read_bool(const struct device_node *np,
- const char *propname)
+static inline bool of_property_present(const struct device_node *np,
+ const char *propname)
{
const struct property *prop = of_find_property(np, propname, NULL);
@@ -1261,17 +1260,19 @@ static inline bool of_property_read_bool(const struct device_node *np,
}
/**
- * of_property_present - Test if a property is present in a node
- * @np: device node to search for the property.
+ * of_property_read_bool - Find a property
+ * @np: device node from which the property value is to be read.
* @propname: name of the property to be searched.
*
- * Test for a property present in a device node.
+ * Search for a boolean property in a device node. Usage on non-boolean
+ * property types is deprecated.
*
* Return: true if the property exists false otherwise.
*/
-static inline bool of_property_present(const struct device_node *np, const char *propname)
+static inline bool of_property_read_bool(const struct device_node *np,
+ const char *propname)
{
- return of_property_read_bool(np, propname);
+ return of_property_present(np, propname);
}
/**
--
2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-12-16 0:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-16 0:40 [PATCH v2 0/7] of: fix bugs and improve codes Zijun Hu
2024-12-16 0:40 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] of: Fix API of_find_node_opts_by_path() finding OF device node failure Zijun Hu
2024-12-16 0:40 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] of: unittest: Add a test case for API of_find_node_opts_by_path() Zijun Hu
2024-12-16 19:23 ` Rob Herring
2024-12-16 21:29 ` Rob Herring
2024-12-16 0:40 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] of: Correct child specifier used as input of the 2nd nexus node Zijun Hu
2024-12-16 0:40 ` Zijun Hu [this message]
2024-12-16 0:40 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] of: Fix available buffer size calculating error in API of_device_uevent_modalias() Zijun Hu
2024-12-16 0:40 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] of: Fix potential wrong MODALIAS uevent value Zijun Hu
2024-12-16 3:42 ` kernel test robot
2024-12-16 3:52 ` kernel test robot
2024-12-16 7:02 ` kernel test robot
2024-12-16 0:40 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] of: Do not expose of_alias_scan() and correct its comments Zijun Hu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241216-of_core_fix-v2-4-e69b8f60da63@quicinc.com \
--to=zijun_hu@icloud.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mripard@kernel.org \
--cc=quic_zijuhu@quicinc.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=saravanak@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox